How does Facebook news use lead to actions in South Korea? The role of Facebook discussion network heterogeneity, political interest, and conflict avoidance in predicting political participation
Introduction
As social networking sites (SNSs) have become a key platform for news use, scholarly attention has given to explore the role of SNS news use in the deliberative or participatory democracy. Prior research has demonstrated that news use on SNSs plays a vital role in linking general SNS use with exposure to political disagreement (Barnidge, 2015) and discussion network heterogeneity (Choi and Lee, 2015, Lee et al., 2014). Even though exposure to diverse views on social networks has been considered as a central part of deliberative processes (Wojcieszak and Mutz, 2009), some studies have suggested that users’ perceptions of political disagreement on SNSs can adversely influence their engagement in political activities (Kim, 2016, Lu et al., 2016). However, given that offline network heterogeneity is shown to lead to actual political engagement (e.g., Kwak et al., 2005, Song and Eveland, 2015), SNS discussion network heterogeneity may positively affect political outcomes.
In fact, Kim and Chen (2015) indicate that the frequent use of news content on SNSs expands users' levels of discussion network heterogeneity, which encourages their involvement in civic activities. Civic engagement is conceptually different from political participation (Gil de Zúñiga et al., 2012, Kim and Chen, 2015). Civic engagement involves activities designed to address or solve issues in a community or neighborhoods (Zukin et al., 2006). Political participation refers to behaviors aimed at exerting influence on government actions or policies (Verba et al., 1995). Activities for civic engagement (e.g., “participating in activities for charity,” “caring for local issues and neighbors”) do not require people to express their fixed position (Kim and Chen, 2015). Conversely, activities for political participation including “voting and attending political rallies” ask people to voice their fixed position (Lee, 2012). That is, civic engagement is related to non-position taking activities, whereas political participation is related to position-taking activities (Kim and Chen, 2015). SNS discussion network heterogeneity was found to foster users’ engagement in non-position taking civic activities (Kim and Chen, 2015). However, as Kim and Chen (2015) mentioned as a limitation of their study, we cannot generalize this finding to political participation that usually requires taking a position. The current study adds to the literature by exploring the association between Facebook users' discussion network heterogeneity and their offline political behaviors. In addition, the researcher tests whether Facebook discussion network heterogeneity mediates an impact of Facebook news use on users’ actual engagement in political activities.
More importantly, this study investigates whether and how this mediating effect varies depending on individual differences in political interest and conflict avoidance. Prior research has shown that SNS users’ political interest and conflict avoidance influence their engagement in political discussions on online networks (e.g., Choi and Lee, 2015, Vraga et al., 2015). Therefore, this study predicts that the indirect effect of Facebook use for news on political participation via Facebook discussion network heterogeneity will be moderated by Facebook users’ political interest and conflict avoidance. This proposed moderated mediation model (See Fig. 1) is tested in the context of South Korea. As of July 2016, six out of 10 Internet users in South Korea (65.2%) are reported to use SNSs and their average use time per week was 63 min (Internet Usage Survey, 2016). Mainstream media in South Korea is known to be ideologically polarized (Kim and Hyun, 2017). Empirical studies have shown that the use of SNSs in South Korea reflects such ideological divisions (e.g., Hahn et al., 2015).
Section snippets
Facebook use for news and discussion network heterogeneity
SNS users not only retain pre-existing social ties but also make new relationships with others who have a broad range of political and socioeconomic backgrounds beyond a geographical location (Ellison et al., 2007). Specifically, 53% of Facebook users and 39% of Twitter users reported that they have online friends with a mix of political views (Pew Research Center, 2016). Furthermore, many SNS users do not block or defriend their online friends just because of political disagreement (Pew
Participants
This study conducted a web-based survey to test hypotheses. The total of 470 participants was recruited from national online panels of a research company based in South Korea. The mean age of 470 participants was 39 years (SD = 11.9) and 50% was male respondents. Participants’ education level was assessed by a 6-point scale (1 = grade school, 6 = graduate school) (M = 4.69, SD = 0.82; Mdn = college degree). Income was gauged using a 6-point scale (1 = less than $9000, 6 = more than $ 90,000) (
Results
To test H1, H2, H3, a mediation analysis was conducted with the PROCESS macro model 4 (Hayes, 2013). H1 predicted that Facebook use for news will be positively associated with discussion network heterogeneity on Facebook. Results showed that those who more frequently use Facebook for news are likely to hold a more heterogeneous discussion network on Facebook (b = .58, SE = .05, t = 12.23, p < .001). Therefore, H1 was supported.
H2 posited that discussion network heterogeneity on Facebook will be
Discussion
This study investigated whether and how Facebook users’ news use promotes their political participation. The findings show that the influence of Facebook use for news on participation in political activities is mediated by Facebook discussion network heterogeneity. Further, such indirect relationship is moderated by Facebook users’ political interest and conflict avoidance.
The results of the current study have several implications. First, this study extends previous studies on the relationship
References (61)
The role of news in promoting political disagreement on social media
Comput. Hum. Behav.
(2015)- et al.
Investigating the effects of news sharing and political interest on social media network heterogeneity
Comput. Hum. Behav.
(2015) - et al.
Stumbling upon news on the Internet: Effects of incidental news exposure and relative entertainment use on political engagement
Comput. Hum. Behav.
(2013) The contribution of social network sites to exposure to political difference: the relationships among SNSs, online political messaging, and exposure to cross-cutting perspectives
Comput. Hum. Behav.
(2011)- et al.
Cross-cutting exposure on social networking sites: The effects of SNS discussion disagreement on political participation
Comput. Hum. Behav.
(2016) - et al.
How individual sensitivities to disagreement shape youth political expression on Facebook
Comput. Hum. Behav.
(2015) Toward a deliberative model of democratic legitimacy
Encountering “difference” in the contemporary public sphere: the contribution of the Internet to the heterogeneity of political discussion networks
J. Commun.
(2010)Political discussion and news use in the contemporary public sphere: the “accessibility” and “traversability” of the Internet
Javnost—The Public
(2010)Toward a theory of citizen interface with political discussion and news in the contemporary public sphere
Int. J. Commun.
(2010)
Argument repertoire as a reliable and valid measure of opinion quality: electronic dialogue during campaign 2000
Polit. Commun.
Differential use, differential effects: investigating the roles of different modes of news use in promoting political participation
J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun.
The quality of democracy
Why do partisan audiences participate? Perceived public opinion as the mediating mechanism
Commun. Res.
Information, interaction, and creative production: the effects of three forms of Internet use on youth democratic engagement
Commun. Res.
The benefits of Facebook “friends”: Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites
J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun.
Political discussion frequency, network size, and “heterogeneity” of discussion as predictors of political knowledge and participation
J. Commun.
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Social media use for news and Individuals’ social capital, civic engagement and political participation
J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun.
Social media, political expression, and political participation: panel analysis of lagged and concurrent relationships
J. Commun.
Perceived disagreement and heterogeneity in Social Networks: distinct effects on political participation
J. Soc. Psychol.
Fragmentation in the Twitter following of news outlets: the representation of South Korean users’ ideological and generational cleavage
J. Mass Commun. Quart.
Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach
Nonparticipation as self censorship: publicly observable political activity in a polarized opinion climate
Polit. Behav.
Filtering out the other side? Cross-cutting and like-minded discussions on social networking sites
New Media Soc.
Disagreement, ambivalence, and engagement: The political consequences of heterogeneous networks
Political Psychology.
Red media, blue media: evidence of ideological selectivity in media use
J. Commun.
The mediating role of knowledge and efficacy in the effects of communication on political participation
Mass Commun. Soc.
Cited by (17)
Understanding empowerment process of willingness to speak out on social media: Amplifying effect of supportive communication
2022, Telematics and InformaticsCitation Excerpt :In particular, social media present an opportunity to change the understanding of opinion climate by allowing people to access others’ views and exchange opinions via online comment systems. One posited that on social media, discussion with others who have diverse perspectives enable users to find various viewpoints, accelerating information seeking to reinforce their own opinion and leading to political participation (Kim, 2018). In other words, the Internet allows people to explore diverse perspectives and share opinions with like-minded others, and it has become difficult for people to apprehend societal majority opinions (Schulz and Roessler, 2012).
Who inadvertently shares deepfakes? Analyzing the role of political interest, cognitive ability, and social network size
2021, Telematics and InformaticsCitation Excerpt :Recent evidence suggests that those who are highly interested in politics are more likely to intentionally and unintentionally share disinformation on social media than their low interested counterparts (Chadwick and Vaccari, 2019). This report is pitted against a backdrop of a body of research which has appreciated the supportive role of political interest in contributing to the development of democratic processes (e.g., Brady et al., 1995; Glenn and Grimes, 1968; Kim, 2018; Shani, 2009). This body of work has suggested that higher political interest transfers into higher political engagement, mainly because it determines how news is consumed in a high-choice media environment (Lecheler and de Vreese, 2017; Strömbäck et al., 2013), how citizens consume political information and engage in motivated information processing (Prior, 2007), and how citizens transfer higher news consumption into higher levels of political learning and participation (Ahmed and Cho, 2019; Delli Carpini and Keeter, 1996; Eveland and Scheufele, 2000; Verba et al., 1995; Yamamoto et al., 2018).
Intentions to participate in political crowdfunding- from the perspective of civic voluntarism model and theory of planned behavior
2020, Technology in SocietyCitation Excerpt :Political interest is a good determinant of political participation online or offline and can manifest itself in political discussions and comments [2,4,5]. Kim [6] suggested that people with high political interests often use social media to avoid conflict in offline politics. Brady et al. [7], stated that the most imperative predictor of political participation is political interest.
The Influence of Online Political Expression on Disagreement and Incivility: The Moderating Role of Social Identity
2024, Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic MediaCross-cutting exposures on social network sites. The moderating role of national environments
2023, Asian Journal of Comparative Politics