Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ws8qp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T16:23:59.374Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Energy efficient strategies with BS sleep mode in green small cell networks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2015

Hong Zhang
Affiliation:
University of Manitoba
Jun Cai
Affiliation:
University of Manitoba
Alagan Anpalagan
Affiliation:
Ryerson Polytechnic University, Toronto
Mehdi Bennis
Affiliation:
University of Oulu, Finland
Rath Vannithamby
Affiliation:
Intel Corporation, Portland, Oregon
Get access

Summary

The traditional mobile cellular networks are often designed so that a base station (BS) is always under uninterrupted working condition without considering the dynamic nature of user traffic, which results in an inefficient usage of energy. How to improve the system energy efficiency in order to achieve green networking is our major concern in this chapter. Beginning with a comprehensive review of the related works in literature, we introduce a self-organized BS virtual small networking (VSN) protocol so as to adaptively manage BSs' working states based on heterogeneity of user traffic changing in space and time. Motivated by the fact that low-traffic areas can apply a more aggressive BS-off strategy than hotspots, the proposed method is targeted at dividing BSs into groups with some similarity measurements so that the BS-off strategy can be performed more efficiently. Numerical results show that our proposals can save energy consumption on the entire cellular network to a great extent.

Introduction

As demand increases for more energy-efficient technologies in wireless networks, to tackle critical issues such as boosting cost on power consumption and excessive greenhouse gas emissions, the concept of green networking has drawn great attention in recent years. In fact, during the last decades, people have witnessed that the carbon footprint of the telecommunications industry has been exponentially growing due to the explosive rise of service requirements and subscribers’ demands. The concern on reducing power consumption comes from both environmental and economical reasons. With respect to the environment, the information and communications technology (ICT) industry is responsible for approximately 2% of current global electricity demands, with 6% yearly growth in ICT-related carbon dioxide emission (CO2-e) forecast till 2020 [1]. With respect to economics, the power consumption for operating a typical base station (BS), which needs to be connected to the electrical grid, may cost approximately $3,000/year, while off-grid BSs, generally running on diesel power generators in remote areas, may cost ten times more [2]. As more than 120,000 new BSs are deployed annually [3], there is still no end in sight for the development of mobile communications with a large amount of new subscribers and a constant desire for upgrading user equipment from 2G to 3G, and then to 4G.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] SMART 2020: Enabling the Low Carbon Economy in the Information Age, The Climate Group and Global e-Sustainability Initiative (GeSI), 2008, www.smart2020.org.
[2] Hasan, Z., Boostanimehr, H., and Bhargava, V. K., “Green cellular networks: a survey, some research issues and challenges,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 524–540, Nov. 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Amanna, A., Green Communications, Wireless@Virginia Tech., Tech. Rep., Feb. 2010.Google Scholar
[4] Bianzino, A. P., Chaudet, C., Rossi, D., and Rougier, J.-L., “A survey of green networking research,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 3–20, Feb. 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Han, C., Harrold, T., Armour, S., et al., “Green radio: radio techniques to enable energy-efficient wireless networks,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 46–54, Jun. 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] Fettweis, G. and Zimmermann, E., “ICT energy consumption-trends and challenges,” Proc. of the 11th International Symposium on Wireless Personal Multimedia Communications, vol. 2, no. 4, Sep. 2008, pp. 1–6.Google Scholar
[7] Fettweis, G. and Zimmermann, E., Green Radio: NECs Approach Towards Energy-efficient Radio Access Networks, NEC Corporation, Tech. Rep., Feb. 2010.Google Scholar
[8] Christensen, K. J., Gunaratne, C., Nordman, B., and George, A. D., “The next frontier for communications networks: power management,” Computer Communications, vol. 27, no. 18, pp. 1758–1770, Dec. 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9] Marsan, M. A., Chiaraviglio, L., Ciullo, D., and Meo, M., “Optimal energy savings in cellular access networks,”Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC'09, GreenCom Wksp.), Jun. 2009, pp. 1–5.Google Scholar
[10] Oh, E., Krishnamachari, B., Liu, X., and Niu, Z., “Toward dynamic energy-efficient operation of cellular network infrastructure,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 56–61, Jun. 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11] Niu, Z., Wu, Y., Gong, J., and Yang, Z., “Cell zooming for cost-efficient green cellular networks,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 48, no. 11, pp. 74–79, Nov. 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12] Weng, X., Cao, D., and Niu, Z., “Energy-efficient cellular network planning under insufficient cell zooming,”Proc. of IEEE 73rd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC-Spring'11 Greenet Wksp.), May 2011, pp. 1–5.Google Scholar
[13] Bhaumik, S., Narlikar, G., Chattopadhyay, S., and Kanugovi, S., “Breathe to stay cool: adjusting cell sizes to reduce energy consumption,”Proc. of 1st ACM SIGCOMM Workshops on Green Networking, Sep. 2010, pp. 41–46.Google Scholar
[14] Wong, W. T., Yu, Y. J., and Pang, A. C., “Decentralized energy-efficient base station operation for green cellular networks,”Proc. of IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM'12), Dec. 2012, pp. 5194–5200.Google Scholar
[15] Chen, Y., Zhang, S., Xu, S., and Li, G. Y., “Fundamental trade-offs on green wireless networks,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 30–37, June 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16] Hoydis, J., Kobayashi, M., and Debbah, M., “Green small-cell networks,” IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 37–43, Mar. 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17] Hoydis, J., Kobayashi, M., and Debbah, M., LTE Advanced: Heterogeneous Networks, Qualcomm Inc., Tech. Rep., Jan. 2011, www.qualcomm.com/media/documents/lte-heterogeneous-networks.Google Scholar
[18] Prehofer, C. and Bettstetter, C., “Self-organization in communication networks: principles and design paradigms,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 43, no. 7, pp. 78–85, Jul. 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19] ElSawy, H., Hossain, E., and Kim, D. I., “HetNets with cognitive small cells: user offloading and distributed channel access techniques,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 51, no. 6, Jun. 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20] Lopez-Perez, D., Guvenc, I., LaRoche, G., Kountouris, M., Quek, T. Q., and Zhang, J., “Enhanced intercell interference coordination challenges in heterogeneous networks,” IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 22–30, Jun. 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[21] Aliu, O., Imran, A., Imran, M., and Evans, B., “A survey of self organisation in future cellular networks,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 336–361, Feb. 2012.Google Scholar
[22] Chiaraviglio, L., Ciullo, D., Meo, M., Marsan, M. A., and Torino, I., “Energy-aware UMTS access networks,”Proc. of 11th International Symposium on Wireless Personal Multimedia Communications (W-GREEN'08), Sep. 2008, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
[23] 3GPP TS 36.141 V11.2.0, “Technical specification group radio access network, E-UTRA base Station conformance testing, Release 11,” Nov. 2012.
[24] Hossain, M. F., Munasinghe, K. S., and Jamalipour, A., “A protocooperation-based sleep-wake architecture for next generation green cellular access networks,”Proc. of 4th International Conference on Signal Processing and Communication Systems (ICSPCS'10), Dec. 2010, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
[25] Richter, F., Fehske, A. J., and Fettweis, G. P., “Energy efficiency aspects of base station deployment strategies for cellular networks,”Proc. of 70th Vehicular Technology Conference Fall (VTC-Fall'09), Sep. 2009, pp. 1–5.Google Scholar
[26] Shu, H., Liang, Q., and Gao, J., “Wireless sensor network lifetime analysis using interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 416–427, Apr. 2008.Google Scholar
[27] Lee, J. S. and Cheng, W. L., “Fuzzy-logic-based clustering approach for wireless sensor networks using energy predication,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 2891–2897, Sep. 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[28] Zadeh, L. A., “Fuzzy algorithms,” Information and Control, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 94–102, Feb. 1968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[29] Cox, E., “Fuzzy fundamentals,” IEEE Spectrum, vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 58–61, Oct. 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[30] Burshtein, D., “Robust parametric modeling of durations in hidden markov models,” IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 240–242, Aug. 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[31] Lou, H. L., “Implementing the Viterbi algorithm,” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 42–52, Sep. 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[32] Yang, X. S., Nature-inspired Metaheuristic Algorithms. Luniver Press, 2010.Google Scholar
[33] Fang, J. and Li, H., “Power constrained distributed estimation with cluster-based sensor collaboration,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 3822–3832, Jul. 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[34] ITU-R, Guidelines for Evaluation of Radio Interface Technologies for IMT-Advanced, Geneva, Switzerland, Rep. ITU-R M.2135-1, Tech. Rep., Dec. 2009, www.itu.int/pub/R-REP-M.2135/en.
[35] Arnold, O., Richter, F., Fettweis, G., and Blume, O., “Power consumption modeling of different base station types in heterogeneous cellular networks,”Proc. of 19th Future Network and Mobile Summit, Jun. 2010, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
[36] 2012 Guidelines to DEFRA/DECC's GHG Conversion Factors for Company Reporting. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA), UK, Tech. Rep., Aug. 2012, www.defra.gov.uk/publications/2012/05/30/pb13773-2012-ghg-conversion.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×