Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T14:20:14.104Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Glaser Twist: Focus on the Mixture Parameters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2018

Henry W. Block*
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
Naftali A. Langberg*
Affiliation:
University of Haifa
Thomas H. Savits*
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
*
Postal address: Department of Statistics, University of Pittsburgh, 2717 Cathedral of Learning, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.
∗∗∗ Postal address: Department of Statistics, Haifa University, Mount Carmel, Haifa 31999, Israel.
Postal address: Department of Statistics, University of Pittsburgh, 2717 Cathedral of Learning, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In this paper we introduce a variation on Glaser's method for determining the shape of the failure rate function of a mixture. It has often been seen that the shape of the failure rate depends on the mixing parameter q. Our method provides an explanation for this phenomenon. We then illustrate our technique with the mixture of an exponential and a gamma density for all possible cases.

MSC classification

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Applied Probability Trust 

Footnotes

Supported by NSA Grant H 98230-07-1-0018.

References

Block, H. and Joe, H. (1997). Tail behavior of the failure rate functions of mixtures. Lifetime Data Anal. 3, 269288.Google Scholar
Block, H. W., Langberg, N. A. and Savits, T. H. (2012). A mixture of exponentials and IFR gamma distributions having an upsidedown bathtub-shaped failure rate. Prob. Eng. Inf. Sci. 26, 573580.Google Scholar
Block, H. W., Li, Y. and Savits, T. H. (2003a). Initial and final behaviour of failure rate functions for mixtures and systems. J. Appl. Prob. 40, 721740.Google Scholar
Block, H. W., Mi, J. and Savits, T. H. (1993). Burn-in and mixed populations. J. Appl. Prob. 30, 692702.Google Scholar
Block, H. W., Savits, T. H. and Wondmagegnehu, E. T. (2003b). Mixtures of distributions with increasing linear failure rates. J. Appl. Prob. 40, 485504.Google Scholar
Block, H. W., Langberg, N. A., Savits, T. H. and Wang, J. (2010). Continuous mixtures of exponentials and IFR gammas having bathtub-shaped failure rates. J. Appl. Prob. 47, 899907.Google Scholar
Block, H. W., Li, Y., Savits, T. H. and Wang, J. (2008). Continuous mixtures with bathtub-shaped failure rates. J. Appl. Prob. 45, 260270.Google Scholar
Esary, J. D., Marshall, A. W. and Proschan, F. (1970). Some reliability applications of the hazard transform. SIAM J. Appl. 18, 849860.Google Scholar
Glaser, R. E. (1980). Bathtub and related failure rate characterizations. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 75, 67672.Google Scholar
Gupta, R. C. and Warren, R. (2001). Determination of change points of non-monotonic failure rates. Commun. Statist. Theory Meth. 30, 19031903.Google Scholar
Lai, C.-D. and Xie, M. (2006). Stochastic Ageing and Dependence for Reliability. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Marshall, A. W. and Olkin, I. (2007). Life Distributions. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Savits, T. H. (2003). Preservation of generalized bathtub-shaped functions. J. Appl. Prob. 40, 473484.Google Scholar