Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T04:17:14.573Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Strong measure zero sets and rapid filters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Jaime I. Ihoda*
Affiliation:
Institute of Mathematics, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
*
Department of Mathematics, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720.

Abstract

We prove that cons(ZF) implies cons(ZF + Borel conjecture + there exists a Ramsey ultrafilter). We also prove some results on strong measure zero sets from the existence of generalized Luzin sets. We study the relationships between strong measure zero sets and rapid filters on ω.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

This work is part of the author's Ph.D. dissertation at The Hebrew University, Jerusalem. He is grateful to his supervisor, Professor M. Magidor.

References

REFERENCES

[1] Baumgartner, J., Iterated forcing, Surveys in set theory (Mathias, A., editor), London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, vol. 87, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1983, pp. 159.Google Scholar
[2] Blass, A. and Shelah, S., Ultrafilters with small generating sets, Israel Journal of Mathematics (to appear).Google Scholar
[3] Besicovitch, A., Relations between concentrated sets and sets possessing property C, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, vol. 38 (1942), pp. 2023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Borel, É., Sur la classification des ensembles de mesure nulle, Bulletin de la Société Mathématique de France, vol. 47 (1919), pp. 97125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Galvin, F., Mycielski, J. and Solovay, R. M., Strong measure zero sets, Notices of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 26 (1979), p. A280.Google Scholar
[5½] Ihoda, J. and Shelah, S., Souslin forcing, this Journal (to appear).Google Scholar
[6] Kunen, K., Some points in βN, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, vol. 80 (1976), pp. 385398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Laver, R., On the consistency of Boreis conjecture, Acta Mathematica, vol. 137 (1976), pp. 151169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8] Luzin, N., Sur un problème de M. Baire, Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Séances de l'Académie des Sciences, vol. 158 (1914), pp. 12581261.Google Scholar
[9] Mathias, A., Happy families, Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 12 (1977), pp. 59111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10] Miller, A., Rational perfect set forcing, Axiomatic set theory, Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 31, American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island, 1984, pp. 143159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11] Miller, A., Special subsets of the real line, Handbook of set-theoretic topology (Kunen, K. and Vaughan, J., editors), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1984, pp. 201233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12] Miller, A., Some properties of measure and category, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 266 (1981), pp. 93114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13] Miller, A., There are no Q-points in Laver's model for the Borel conjecture, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 78 (1980), pp. 103106.Google Scholar
[14] Mokobodzki, G., Ultrafiltres rapides sur N. Construction d'une densité relative de deux potentiels comparables, Séminaire Brelot-Choquet-Deny sur la théorie du potentiel (1967/68), exposé 12, Secrétariat Mathématique, Paris, 1969.Google Scholar
[15] Raisonnier, J., A mathematical proof of S. Shelah's theorem on the measure problem and related results, Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 48 (1984), pp. 4856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16] Shelah, S., Can you take Solovay's inaccessible away? Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 48 (1984), pp. 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17] Shelah, S., Proper forcing, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 940, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18] Sierpiński, W., Sur le rapport de la propriété (C) à la théorie générale des ensembles, Fundamenta Mathematicae, vol. 29 (1937), pp. 9196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19] Woodin, H., Circulated notes, May 14, 1984.Google Scholar