Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T15:53:09.266Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Categoricity regained

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Erik Ellentuck
Erik Ellentuck*
Affiliation:
Rutgers, The State University, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

One of the earliest goals of modern logic was to characterize familiar mathematical structures up to isomorphism by means of properties expressed in a first order language. This hope was dashed by Skolem's discovery (cf. [6]) of a nonstandard model of first order arithmetic. A theory T such that any two of its models are isomorphic is called categorical. It is well known that if T has any infinite models then T is not categorical. We shall regain categoricity by

(i) enlarging our language so as to allow expressions of infinite length, and

(ii) enlarging our class of isomorphisms so as to allow isomorphisms existing in some Boolean valued extension of the universe of sets.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Symbolic Logic , Volume 41 , Issue 3 , September 1976 , pp. 639 - 643
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Supported by a fellowship from the Rutgers Faculty Academic Study Program.

References

REFERENCES

[1] Barwise, J., Back and forth thru infinitary logic, Studies in mathematics, vol. 8 ( Model theory ), Mathematical Association of America, Washington, D. C., 1973, pp. 5–34.Google Scholar
[2] Jech, T., Lectures in set theory, Springer-Verlag, Berlin and New York, 1971.Google Scholar
[3] Karp, C., Finite-quantifier equivalence, Theory of models, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1965, pp. 407–412.Google Scholar
[4] Ryll-Nardzewski, C., On theories categorical in power ℵ0 , Bulletin de l'Académie Polonaise des Sciences. Série des Sciences Mathématiques, Astronomiques et Physiques, vol. 7 (1959), pp. 545–548.Google Scholar
[5] Scott, D., Logic with denumerably long formulas and finite strings of quantifiers, Theory of models, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1965, pp. 329–341.Google Scholar
[6] Skolem, T., Peano's axioms and models of arithmetic, Mathematical interpretation of formal systems, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1955, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
[7] Takeuti, G. and Zaring, W. M., Axiomatic set theory, Springer-Verlag, Berlin and New York, 1970.Google Scholar