Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-06T17:24:22.283Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Large and small existentially closed structures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

H. Simmons*
Affiliation:
University of Aberdeen, King's college, Aberdeen, Scotland AB9 2UB

Extract

The generic structures introduced by Abraham Robinson are now well established in model theory. Anyone who works with these structures soon begins to feel that, in some sense, the infinite generic structures are large and the finite generic structures are small. Here ‘large’ and ‘small’ do not refer to the cardinality of the structures but are used in the way we describe saturated structures as large and atomic structures as small. In this paper I isolate what I consider to be the large and small existentially closed (e.c.) structures and attempt to determine their role in the class of all e.c. structures.

In the usual context of model theory we are concerned with elementary embeddings and all formulas. E.c. structures are concerned with all embeddings and ∃1-formulas. Thus we need to look at ∃1-analogues of saturated and atomic structures. These ∃1-saturated structures have been around for some time; they are just the existentially universal structures. The corresponding ∃1-atomic structures are not new here (they appear in [8]) but I believe that this paper will add much to the understanding of them.

The bulk of this paper is in §§2 and 4. §2 deals with ∃1-atomic structures, and §4 is concerned with the ∃1-analogues of several results in Vaught's paper [12].

A similar program has been carried out by Pouzet in [6], [7], [8]; however, there the significance of e.c. and e.c. structures is not realized and consequently some of the simplicity of the situation is lost.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Barwise, J., Back and forth through infinitary logic, Studies in model theory (Morley, M. D., Editor), The Mathematical Association of America, Buffalo, N.Y., 1973, pp. 534.Google Scholar
[2] Chang, C. C. and Keisler, H. J., Model theory, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1973.Google Scholar
[3] Cusin, R., Structures préhomoginès et structures ginéréques, Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Seances de L'Académie des Sciences, vol. 273 (1971), pp. 137140.Google Scholar
[4] Macintyre, A., On algebraically closed groups, Annals of Mathematics, vol. 96 (1972), pp. 5397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Pabion, J.-F., Relations préhomoginès, Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Séances de l'Academie des Sciences, vol. 274 (1972), pp. 529531.Google Scholar
[6] Pouzet, M., Modèle universel d'une théorie n-complète, Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Séances de L'Academie des Sciences, vol. 274 (1972), pp. 433436.Google Scholar
[7] Pouzet, M., Modèle universel d'une théorie n-complète: modèle uniformément préhomogène, Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Séances de L'Academie des Sciences, vol. 274 (1972), pp. 695698.Google Scholar
[8] Pouzet, M., Modèle universel d'une théorie n-complète: modèle préhomogène, Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Seances de L'Académie des Sciences, vol. 274 (1972), pp. 813816.Google Scholar
[9] Robinson, A., Nonstandard arithmetic and generic arithmetic, Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress for Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science (Bucharest, 1971) (Suppes, P. et al., Editor), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1973, pp. 137154.Google Scholar
[10] Saracino, D.. Model companions for ℵ0-categorical theories, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 39 (1973), pp. 591598.Google Scholar
[11] Simmons, H., Existentially closed structures, this Journal, vol. 37 (1972), pp. 293310.Google Scholar
[12] Vaught, R. L., Denumerable models of complete theories, Infinitistic methods, Pergamon, London, 1961, pp. 303321.Google Scholar
[13] Wheeler, W. H., Algebraically closed division rings, forcing, and the analytic hierarchy, Doctoral dissertation, Yale University, 1972.Google Scholar
[14] Wood, C., Forcing for infinitary languages, Zeitschrift für mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik, vol. 18 (1972), pp. 385402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar