Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T17:09:54.063Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dextrous telerobotics with force feedback — An overview part 2: control and implementation†

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

Grigore Burdea  and
Jiachen Zhuang
Grigore Burdea
Affiliation:
Rutgers – The State University of New Jersey, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, P. O. Box 909, Piscataway, NJ 08855–0909 (USA)
Jiachen Zhuang
Affiliation:
Rutgers – The State University of New Jersey, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, P. O. Box 909, Piscataway, NJ 08855–0909 (USA)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The control stategy for a dextrous masters is different from the general case of bilateral teleoperation since it models the human hand in much more detail. Such a model is discussed together with the selection of actuators used for force feedback control. Existing prototypes of dextrous masters with force feedback are then reviewed. These are the Servo Controlled Manipulator Device, the Portable Dextrous Force Feedback Master (P.D.M.F.F.), the Remote Handler, and the Advanced Multiple DOF Force Reflective Hand/Wrist Master.

Keywords

TeleroboticsForce feedbackControlImplementationDextrous masters.
Type
Article
Information
Robotica , Volume 9 , Issue 3 , July 1991 , pp. 291 - 298
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

7. References

1.Vertut, J. and Coiffet, P., “Teleoperations and Robotics: Applications and Technology” Robot Technology 3B, (Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 1986).Google Scholar
2.Salisbury, J.K., “Design and Control of an Articulated Hand” Design and Synthesis (Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam, 1985) pp. 353–360.Google Scholar
3.Jacobsen, S.C., Iversen, E.K., Knutti, D.F., Johnson, R.T. and Biggers, K.B., “Design of the Utah/MIT Dextrous Hand” IEEE Int'l Conf. on Robotics and Automation 1520–1531 (1986).Google Scholar
4.Bekey, G., Tomovic, R. and Zalikovic, I., “Control Architecture for the Belgrade-USC Hand” Dextrous Robot Hands (Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1990).Google Scholar
5.DataGlove Model 2 Operating Manual (VPL Research, Inc., Redwood City, CA, 1987).Google Scholar
6.Marcus, B.A. and Churchill, P.J., Sensing Human Hand Motions for Controlling Dextrous Robots (A.D. Little, New York, 1988).Google Scholar
7.Hong, J. and Tan, X., “Teleoperating the Utah/MIT Hand with a VPL DataGlove I. DataGlove Calibration” IEEE Int'l Conf. on Robotics and Automation 1752–1757 (1988).Google Scholar
8.Hill, J.W., “Study to Design and Develop Remote Manipulator Systems” NASA Contract NAS2–8652, SRI Project 4055, NSAS (AMES Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, 07, 1976).Google Scholar
9.Grupen, R.A. and Henderson, T.C., “A Survey of Dextrous Manipulation” Technical Report University of Utah (1986).Google Scholar
10.An, K.N., Chao, E.Y., Cooney, W.P. and Linscheid, R.L., “Normative Model of Human Hand for Biomechanical Analysis” J. Biomechanics 12, 775–788 (1979).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Taylor, C.L. and Schwarz, R.J., “The Anatomy and Mechanics of the Human Hand” Artificial Limbs 2, 22–35 (05, 1955).Google ScholarPubMed
12.Cutkosky, M.R., “On Grasp Choice, Grasp Models, and the Design of Hands for Manufacturing Tasks” IEEE Trans, on Robotics and Automation 269–279 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Nguyen, T.N. and Stephanou, H.E., “A Topological Model of Multifingered Prehension” IEEE Int'l Conf. on Robotics and Automation 446–451 (1989).Google Scholar
14.An, K.N., Askew, L.J. and Chao, E.Y., “Biomechanics and Functional Assessment of Upper Extremities” In: Trends in Ergonomics/Human Factors III, 573–580 (Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam, 1986).Google Scholar
15.Raju, G.J., “Operator Adjustable Impedance in Bilateral Remote Manipulation” Contract 956892, JPL (1988).Google Scholar
16.Hogan, N., “Controlling Impedance at the Man/Machine Interface” IEEE Int'l Conf. on Robotics and Automation 1626–1631 (1989).Google Scholar
17.Abul-Haj, C., “The Design of an Elbow Prosthesis Simulator for Testing Neurophysiologically Based Controllers” Proceedings of the 5th Annual Conference on Rehabilitation Engineering (1982) pp. 130–132.Google Scholar
18.Bastas, D. and Goldenberg, A.A., Development of a Mechanical Impedance Regulator (Robotics and Atuomation Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada).Google Scholar
19.Goldenberg, A.A., “Implementation of Force and Imped ance Control in Robot Manipulators” IEEE Int'l Conf. on Robotics and Automation 1626–1632 (IEEE Computer Society Press, 04 24–29, 1988).Google Scholar
20.Hannaford, B. and Anderson, R., “Experimental and Simulation Studies of Hard Contact in Force Reflecting Teleoperation” IEEE Int'l Conf. on Robotics and Automation 584–588 (04 24–29, 1988).Google Scholar
21.Hannaford, B., “A Design Framework for Teleoperators with Kinesthetic Feedback” IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 5, No. 4, pp. 426–434 (08 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Quartes, T., Newton, A.R., Pederson, D.O. and Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, A., SPICE 3B1 User's Guide (Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, (04 27, 1987).Google Scholar
23.Lee, S., Bekey, G. and Bejczy, A. K., “Computer Control of Space-borne Teleoperators with Sensory Feedback” IEEE Infl Conf. on Robotics and Automation 205–214 (1985).Google Scholar
24.Pao, L. and Speeter, T.H., “Transformation of Human Hand Positions for Robotic Hand Control” IEEE Int'l Conf. on Robotics and Automation 1758–1763 (1989).Google Scholar
25.Jacobsen, S.C., Iversen, E.K., Davis, C.C., Potter, D.M. and McLain, T.W., “Design of a Multiple Degree of Freedom, Force Reflective Hand Master/Slave with a High Mobility Wrist” Third Topical Meeting on Robotics and Remote Systems (03 13–16, 1989).Google Scholar
26.Hirose, S., Ikuta, K. and Umetani, Y., “Development of shape-memory alloy actuators. Performance assessment and introduction of a new composing approach” Advanced Robotics 3, No. 1, 3–16 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.Jacobsen, S.C., Ko, H., Iversen, E.K. and Davis, C.C., “Antagonistic Control of a Tendon Driven Manipulator” IEEE Int'l Conf. on Robotics and Automation 1334–1339 (1989).Google Scholar
28.Jones, L., U.S. Patent 3,263,824: Servo Controlled Manipulator Device Northrop Corporation, Beverly Hills, CA (08 2, 1966).Google Scholar
29.Burdea, G.C. and Specter, T., “Portable Dextrous Force Feedback Master for Robot Telemanipulation (P.D.M.F.F.)” Proceedings 1989 NASA Conference on Space Telerobotics (NASA, 01 1989) pp. 156–161.Google Scholar
30.Burdea, G.C., “Human/Machine Interaction in Telerobotic Dextrous Feedback” Symposium on Dynamics and Control of Biomechanical Systems, 1989 ASME Winter Annual Meeting (12 1989) pp. 65–69.Google Scholar
31.Bejczy, A.K. and Salisbury, J.K., “Kinesthetic Coupling Between Operator and Remote Manipulator” Advances in Computer Technology-1980 1, 197–211, ASME (1980).Google Scholar
32.Zarudiansky, A., U.S. Patent 4,392,138: Remote Handling Devices (11 24, 1981).Google Scholar
33.Jau, B.M., The Jau-JPL Anthropomorphic Telerobot Proceedings NASA Conference on Space Telerobotics vol. IV (Pasadena, CA, 1989) pp. 75–80. (Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Caltech., Pasadena, CA).Google Scholar