Hostname: page-component-6b989bf9dc-lb7rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-14T19:49:52.168Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Development, design and validation of an assistive device for hand disabilities based on an innovative mechanism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2015

Roberto Conti*
Affiliation:
Department of Industrial Engineering (DIEF), University of Florence Via di Santa Marta, 3 - 50139 Florence, Italy
Benedetto Allotta
Affiliation:
Department of Industrial Engineering (DIEF), University of Florence Via di Santa Marta, 3 - 50139 Florence, Italy
Enrico Meli
Affiliation:
Department of Industrial Engineering (DIEF), University of Florence Via di Santa Marta, 3 - 50139 Florence, Italy
Alessandro Ridolfi
Affiliation:
Department of Industrial Engineering (DIEF), University of Florence Via di Santa Marta, 3 - 50139 Florence, Italy
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: roberto.conti@unifi.it

Summary

In accordance with strict requirements of portability, cheapness, and modularity, an innovative assistive device for hand disabilities has been developed and validated. This robotic orthosis is designed to be a low-cost, portable hand exoskeleton to assist people with physical disabilities in their everyday lives. Referring to hand opening disabilities, the authors have developed a methodology which, by starting from the geometrical characteristics of the patient's hand, defines the novel kinematic mechanism that better fits to the finger trajectories. The authors have validated the proposed novel mechanism by carrying out a Hand Exoskeleton System (HES) prototype, based on a single-phalanx mechanism, cable driven. The testing phase of the real prototype with a patient is currently on going.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Harwin, W., Patton, J. and Edgerton, V., “Challenges and opportunities for robot-mediated neurorehabilitation,” Proc. IEEE 94 (9), 17171726 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Leeb, R., Gubler, M., Tavella, M., Miller, H. and del Millan, J., “On the Road to a Neuroprosthetic Hand: A Novel Hand Grasp Orthosis Based on Functional Electrical Stimulation,” Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society EMBC2010 (2010) pp. 146–149.Google Scholar
3. Fontana, M., Bergamasco, M. and Marcheschi, S., “Haptic hand exoskeleton for precision grasp simulation,” ASME J. Mech. Robot. 5 (4), 918 (2013).Google Scholar
4. Yihun, Y., Miklos, R., Perez-Gracia, A., Reinkensmeyer, D., Denney, K. and Wolbrecht, E., “Single Degree-of-Freedom Exoskeleton Mechanism Design for Thumb Rehabilitation,” Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society EMBC2012 (2012) pp. 1916–1920.Google Scholar
5. Choi, B. and Choi, H., “Skk Hand Master-Hand Exoskeleton Driven by Ultrasonic Motors,” Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems IROS2000, vol. 2 (2000) pp. 1131–1136.Google Scholar
6. DiCicco, M., Lucas, L. and Matsuoka, Y., “Comparison of Control Strategies for an Emg Controlled Orthotic Exoskeleton for the Hand,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation ICRA2004, vol. 2 (2004) pp. 1622–1627.Google Scholar
7. Blake, J. and Gurocak, H., “Haptic glove with mr brakes for virtual reality,” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics 14 (5), 606615 (2009).Google Scholar
8. Wege, A., Kondak, K. and Hommel, G., “Mechanical Design and Motion Control of a Hand Exoskeleton for Rehabilitation,” IEEE International Conference Mechatronics and Automation, vol. 1 (2005) pp. 155–159.Google Scholar
9. Worsnopp, T., Peshkin, M., Colgate, J. and Kamper, D., “An Actuated Finger Exoskeleton for Hand Rehabilitation Following Stroke,” IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics ICORR2007 (2007) pp. 896–901.Google Scholar
10. Polygerinos, P., Wang, Z., Galloway, K. C., Wood, R. J. and Walsh, C. J., “Soft robotic glove for combined assistance and at-home rehabilitation,” Robot. Auton. Syst., vol. 73 (2015) pp. 135–143.Google Scholar
11. Hasegawa, Y., Mikami, Y., Watanabe, K. and Sankai, Y., “Five-Fingered Assistive Hand with Mechanical Compliance of Human Finger,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation ICRA (2008) pp. 718–724.Google Scholar
12. Chiri, A., Vitiello, N., Giovacchini, F., Roccella, S., Vecchi, F. and Carrozza, M., “Mechatronic design and characterization of the index finger module of a hand exoskeleton for post-stroke rehabilitation,” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics 17 (5), 884894 (2012).Google Scholar
13. Cempini, M., De Rossi, S., Lenzi, T., Cortese, M., Giovacchini, F., Vitiello, N. and Carrozza, M., “Kinematics and Design of a Portable and Wearable Exoskeleton for Hand Rehabilitation,” IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics ICORR2013 (2013) pp. 1–6.Google Scholar
14. Watanabe, K., Morishita, H., Mori, T. and Sato, T., “A Prototype of Index-Finger Pip Joint Motion Amplifier for Assisting Patients with Impaired Hand Mobility,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (2007) pp. 4146–4151.Google Scholar
15. Amirabdollahian, F., Ates, S., Basteris, A., Cesario, A., Buurke, J., Hermens, H., Hofs, D., Johansson, E., Mountain, G., Nasr, N., Nijenhuis, S., Prange, G., Rahman, N., Sale, P., SchÃtzlein, F., van Schooten, B. and Stienen, A., “Design, development and deployment of a hand/wrist exoskeleton for home-based rehabilitation after stroke - script project,” Robotica 32 (12), 13311346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Stienen, A., Hekman, E., van der Helm, F. and van der Kooij, H., “Self-aligning exoskeleton axes through decoupling of joint rotations and translations,” IEEE Trans. Robot. 25 (3), 628633 (2009).Google Scholar
17. Cempini, M., De Rossi, S., Lenzi, T., Vitiello, N. and Carrozza, M., “Self-alignment mechanisms for assistive wearable robots: A kinetostatic compatibility method,” IEEE Trans. Robot. 29 (1), 236250 (2013).Google Scholar

Conti supplementary material

Conti supplementary material 1

Download Conti supplementary material(Video)
Video 11.1 MB