Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T23:38:08.278Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Design and implementation of a variable stiffness actuator based on flexible gear rack mechanism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2017

Wei Wang ,
Xiaoyue Fu ,
Yangmin Li  and
Chao Yun
Wei Wang*
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Beihang University, Beijing, P.R. China. E-mails: 1582790103@qq.com, cyun18@vip.sina.com
Xiaoyue Fu
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Beihang University, Beijing, P.R. China. E-mails: 1582790103@qq.com, cyun18@vip.sina.com
Yangmin Li
Affiliation:
Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, the Hongkong Polytechnic University, Hongkong S.A.R. E-mail: yangmin.li@polyu.edu.hk
Chao Yun
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Beihang University, Beijing, P.R. China. E-mails: 1582790103@qq.com, cyun18@vip.sina.com
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: jwwx@163.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Variable stiffness can improve the capability of human–robot interacting. Based on the mechanism of a flexible rack and gear, a rotational joint actuator named vsaFGR is proposed to regulate the joint stiffness. The flexible gear rack can be regarded as a combination of a non-linear elastic element and a linear adjusting mechanism, providing benefits of compactness. The joint stiffness is in the range of 217–3527 N.m/rad, and it is inversely proportional to the 4th-order of the gear displacement, and nearly independent from the joint angular deflection, providing benefits of quick stiffness regulation in a short displacement of 20 mm. The gear displacement with respect to the flexible gear rack is perpendicular to the joint loading force, so the power required for stiffness regulating is as low as 14.4 W, providing benefits of energy saving. The working principles of vsaFGR are elaborated, followed by presentation on the mechanics model and the prototype. The high compactness, great stiffness range and low power cost of vsaFGR are proved by simulations and experiments.

Keywords

Variable stiffnessFlexible gear rackStiffness regulationRobotJoint actuator
Type
Articles
Information
Robotica , Volume 36 , Issue 3 , March 2018 , pp. 448 - 462
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Grioli, G., Wolf, S., Garabini, M., Catalano, M., Burdet, E., Caldwell, D., Carloni, R., Friedl, W., Grebenstein, M., Laffranchi, M., Lefeber, D., Stramigioli, S., Tsagarakis, N., van Damme, M., Vanderborght, B., Albu-Schaeffer, A. and Bicchi, A., “Variable stiffness actuators: The user's point of view,” Int. J. Robot. Res. 34 (6), 727–743 (2015).Google Scholar
2. Lefeber, D., “Use of Compliant Actuators in Robotic Applications,” Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Advanced Technologies for Enhanced Quality of Life, Iasi, Romania (2009) pp. 22–22.Google Scholar
3. Vanderborght, B., Albu-Schaeffer, A., Bicchi, A., Burdet, E., Caldwell, D. G., Carloni, R., Catalano, M., Eiberger, O., Friedl, W., Ganesh, G., Garabini, M., Grebenstein, M., Grioli, G., Haddadin, S., Hoppner, H., Jafari, A., Laffranchi, M., Lefeber, D., Petit, F., Stramigioli, S., Tsagarakis, N., Van Damme, M., Van Ham, R., Visser, L. C. and Wolf, S., “Variable impedance actuators: A review,” Robot. Auton. Syst. 61 (12), 1601–1614 (2013).Google Scholar
4. Ham, R. V., Thomas, S., Vanderborght, B., Hollander, K. W. and Lefeber, D., “Compliant actuator designs: Review of actuators with passive adjustable compliance/controllable stiffness for robotic applications,” IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 16 (1), 81–94 (Sep. 2009).Google Scholar
5. Albu-Schaffer, A., Eiberger, O., Grebenstein, M., Haddadin, S., Ott, C., Wimbock, T., Wolf, S. and Hirzinger, G., “Soft robotics,” IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 15 (3), 20–30 (Sep. 2008).Google Scholar
6. Lee, S., “Development of a new variable remote center compliance (VRCC) with modified elastomer shear pad (ESP) for robot assembly,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng 2 (2), 193–197 (2005).Google Scholar
7. Pratt, G. A. and Williamson, M. M., “Series Elastic Actuators,” Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems ‘Human Robot Interaction and Cooperative Robots’, Pittsburgh, PA, USA (1995) pp. 399–406.Google Scholar
8. Tsagarakis, N. G., Laffranchi, M. and Vanderborght, B., “A Compact Soft Actuator Unit for Small Scale Human Friendly Robots,” Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Kobe, Japan (2009) pp. 4356–4362.Google Scholar
9. Laffranchi, M., Tsagarakis, N. and Caldwell, D. G., “A Compact Compliant Actuator (CompAct™) with Variable Physical Damping,” Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Shanghai, China (2011) pp. 4644–4650.Google Scholar
10. Shafer, A. S. and Kermani, M. R., “On the feasibility and suitability of MR fluid clutches in human-friendly manipulators,” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics 16 (6), 1073–1082 (Dec. 2011).Google Scholar
11. Kajikawa, S. and Abe, K., “Robot finger module with multidirectional adjustable joint stiffness,” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics 17 (1), 128–135 (Feb. 2012).Google Scholar
12. Du, Y., Fang, Z., Wu, Z. and Tian, Q., “Thermomechanical Compliant Actuator Design using Meshless Topology Optimization,” Proceedings of Asia Simulation Conference-7th International Conference on System Simulation and Scientific Computing, Beijing, China (2008) pp. 1018–1025.Google Scholar
13. Choi, J., Park, S., Lee, W. and Kang, S.C., “Design of a Robot Joint with Variable Stiffness,” Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Pasadena, CA, USA (2008) pp. 1760–1765.Google Scholar
14. Kianzad, S., Pandit, M., Lewis, J., Berlingeri, A., Haebler, K. and Madden, J., “Variable Stiffness Structure using Nylon Actuators Arranged in a Pennate Muscle Configuration,” Proceedings of the International Society for Optics and Photonics on SPIE Smart Structures and Materials+ Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring, San Diego, California, United States (2015) pp. 94301Z–94301Z-5.Google Scholar
15. Koganezawa, K., Inaba, T. and Nakazawa, T., “Stiffness and Angle Control of Antagonistially Driven Joint,” Proceedings of The First IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, Pisa, Italy (2006) pp. 1007–1013.Google Scholar
16. Tonietti, G., Schiavi, R. and Bicchi, A., “Design and Control of a Variable Stiffness Actuator for Safe and Fast Physical Human/robot Interaction,” Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Barcelona, Spain (2005) pp. 526–531.Google Scholar
17. Schiavi, R., Grioli, G., Sen, S. and Bicchi, A., “VSA-II: A Novel Prototype of Variable Stiffness Actuator for Safe and Performing Robots Interacting with Humans,” Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Pasadena, CA, USA (2008) pp. 271–276.Google Scholar
18. Hurst, J. and Rizzi, A., “Series compliance for an efficient running gait,” IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 15 (13), 42–51 (Sep. 2008).Google Scholar
19. Chou, C. and Hannaford, B., “Measurement and modeling of mckibben pneumatic artificial muscles,” IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 12 (1), 90–102 (Feb. 1996).Google Scholar
20. Eiberger, O., Haddadin, S., Weis, M., Albu-Schäffer, A. and Hirzinger, G., “On Joint Design with Intrinsic Variable Compliance: Derivation of the DLR QA-Joint,” Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Anchorage, AK, USA (2010) pp. 1687–1694.Google Scholar
21. Zhou, X., Seung-kook, J., and Venkat, K., “A cable based active variable stiffness module with decoupled tension,” J. Mech. Robot. 7 (1), 011005–011009 (Feb. 2015).Google Scholar
22. Jafari, A., Tsagarakis, N. G., Vanderborght, B. and Caldwell, D. G., “A Novel Actuator with Adjustable Stiffness (AwAS),” Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Taipei, Taiwan (2010) pp. 4201–6206.Google Scholar
23. Kim, B. S. and Song, J. B., “Hybrid Dual Actuator Unit: A Design of a Variable Stiffness Actuator based on an Adjustable Moment Arm Mechanism,” Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Anchorage, AK, USA (2010) pp. 34–40.Google Scholar
24. Kim, B. S. and Song, J. B., “Design and control of a variable stiffness actuator based on adjustable moment arm,” IEEE Trans. Robotics 28 (5), 1145–1151 (Oct. 2012).Google Scholar
25. Visser, L., Carloni, R., Unal, R. and Stramigioli, S., “Modeling and Design of Energy Efficient Variable Stiffness Actuators,” Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Anchorage, AK, USA (2010) pp. 4321–4327.Google Scholar
26. Jafari, Amir, Tsagarakis, N. G., Sardellitti, I. and Caldwell, D. G., “A new actuator with adjustable stiffness based on a variable ratio lever mechanism,” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics 19 (1), 55–63 (Feb. 2014).Google Scholar
27. Groothuis, S. S., Rusticelli, G., Zucchelli, A., Stramigioli, S. and Carloni, R.. “The variable stiffness actuator vsaUT-II: Mechanical design, modeling, and identification,” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics 19 (2), 598–597 (Apr. 2014).Google Scholar
28. Vuong, N., Li, R., Chew, C., Jafari, A. and Polden, J.. “A novel variable stiffness mechanism with linear spring characteristic for machining operations,” Robotica 35 (7), 1627–1637 (Jul. 2017).Google Scholar
29. Hollander, K., Sugar, T. and Herring, D., “Adjustable Robotic Tendon using a Jack Spring,” Proceedings of the 9th IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, Chicago, IL, USA (2005) pp. 113–118.Google Scholar
30. Ham, R. V., Damme, M. V., Verrelst, B. and Lefeber, D., “MACCEPA, the mechanically adjustable compliance and controllable equilibrium position actuator: Design and implementation in biped robot,” Robot. Auton. Syst. 55 (10), pp. 761–768 (Mar. 2007).Google Scholar
31. Wolf, S. and Hirzinger, G., “A New Variable Stiffness Design: Matching Requirements of the Next Robot Generation,” Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Pasadena, CA, USA (2008) pp. 1741–1746.Google Scholar
32. Park, J. and Song, J., “Safe Joint Mechanism using Inclined Link with Springs for Collision Safety and Positioning Accuracy of a Robot Arm,” Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Anchorage, AK, USA (2010) pp. 813–818.Google Scholar
33. Petit, F., Friedl, W., Hoppner, H. and Grebenstein, M., “Analysis and synthesis of the bidirectional antagonistic variable stiffness mechanism,” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics 20 (2), 684–695 (Apr. 2015).Google Scholar
34. Alazmani, A., Keeling, D. and Walker, P., “Design and evaluation of a buckled strip compliant Actuator,” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics 18 (6), 1–8 (Dec. 2013).Google Scholar
35. Morita, T. and Sugano, S., “Development of 4-D.O.F. Manipulator using Mechanical Impedance Adjuster,” Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA (1996) pp. 2902–2907.Google Scholar
36. Yalcin, M., Uzunoglu, B., Altintepe, E. and Patoglu, V., “VNSA: Variable Negative Stiffness Actuation based on Nonlinear Deflection Characteristics of Buckling Beams,” Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Tokyo, Japan (2013) pp. 5418–5424.Google Scholar
37. Choi, J., Hong, S., Lee, W. and Kang, S., “A robot joint with variable stiffness using leaf springs,” IEEE Trans. Robotics 27 (2), 229–238 (Apr. 2011).Google Scholar
38. Groothuis, S., Carloni, R. and Stramigioli, S., “A novel variable stiffness mechanism capable of an infinite stiffness range and unlimited decoupled output motion,” Actuators 3 (2), 107–123 (Jun. 2014).Google Scholar
39. Wang, W., Fu, X., Li, Y., and Yun, C., “Design of variable stiffness actuator based on modified Gear–Rack mechanism,” J. Mechanisms Robot., ASME Trans. 8 (6), 061008-1-10 (Dec. 2016).Google Scholar