Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T10:11:00.256Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Design fixation: Classifications and modern methods of prevention

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2014

Robert J. Youmans  and
Thomaz Arciszewski
Robert J. Youmans*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, USA
Thomaz Arciszewski
Affiliation:
Department of Civil, Environmental and Infrastructure Engineering, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, USA
*
Reprint requests to: Robert J. Youmans, Department of Psychology, David King Hall 2057, George Mason University, 4400 University Drive, Fairfax, VA 22030. E-mail: ryouman2@gmu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The term design fixation is often used interchangeably to refer to situations where designers limit their creative output because of an overreliance on features of preexisting designs, or more generally, an overreliance on a specific body of knowledge directly associated with a problem. In this paper, we argue that interdisciplinary interest in design fixation has led to increasingly broad definitions of the phenomenon that may be undermining empirical research efforts, educational efforts to minimize fixation, and the acquisition and dissemination of transdisciplinary knowledge about fixation effects. To address these issues, we recommend that researchers consider categorizing fixation phenomena into one of three classifications: unconscious adherence to the influence of prior designs, conscious blocks to change, and intentional resistance to new ideas. Next, we distinguish between concept-based design fixation, fixation to a specific class of known design concepts, and knowledge-based design fixation, fixation to a problem-specific knowledge base. With these distinctions in place, we propose a system of orders of design fixation, recommend methods for reducing fixation in inventive design, and recommend areas that are in need of further research within the field of design science.

Keywords

Creativity and IdeationDesign CognitionDesign CreativityDesign MethodsDesign Theory
Type
Special Issue Articles
Information
AI EDAM , Volume 28 , Issue 2: Design Computing and Cognition (DCC'12) , May 2014 , pp. 129 - 137
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Altshuller, H. (1994). The Art of Inventing (and Suddenly the Inventor Appeared) (Shulyak, L., Trans.). Worcester, MA: Technical Innovation Center.Google Scholar
Amabile, T.M. (1996). Creativity in Context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Arciszewski, T. (1988 a). ARIZ 77—an innovative design method. Methods and Theories 22(2), 796–820.Google Scholar
Arciszewski, T. (1988 b). Stochastic form optimization. Journal of Engineering Optimization 13(1), 17–33.Google Scholar
Arciszewski, T. (1998). Internet-based teaching/learning tools in structural engineering education. In NASA Conf. Publication, pp. 167–202, March, NASA.Google Scholar
Arciszewski, T. (2009). Successful Education: How to Educate Creative Engineers. Fairfax, VA: Successful Education.Google Scholar
Arciszewski, T., & DeJong, K. (2001). Evolutionary computation in civil engineering: research frontiers. In Civil and Structural Engineering Computing (Topping, B.H.V., Ed.), pp. 161–185. Stirlingshire: Saxe–Coburg.Google Scholar
Ball, L.J., Ormerod, T.C., & Morley, N.J. (2004). Spontaneous analogising in engineering design: a comparative analysis of experts and novices. Design Studies 25(5), 495–508.Google Scholar
Bargh, J.A., & Morsella, E. (2008). The unconscious mind. Perspectives on Psychological Science 3(1), 73–79.Google Scholar
Bellows, B.G., Higgins, J.F., Smith, M.A., & Youmans, R.J. (2012). The effects of individual differences in working memory capacity and design environment on design fixation. In Proc. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, pp. 1977–1981. New York: Sage.Google Scholar
Brown, A.S., & Murphy, D.R. (1989). Cryptomnesia: delineating inadvertent plagiarism. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 15(3), 432–442.Google Scholar
Cardoso, C., & Badke-Schaub, P. (2011 a). Fixation or inspiration: Creative problem solving in design. Journal of Creative Behavior 45(2), 77–82.Google Scholar
Cardoso, C., & Badke-Schaub, P. (2011 b). The influence of different pictorial representations during idea generation. Journal of Creative Behavior 45(2), 130–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casakin, H., & Goldschmidt, G. (1999). Expertise and the use of visual analogy: implications for design education. Design Studies 20(2), 153–175.Google Scholar
Cherry, E.C. (1953). Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and with two ears. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 25(5), 975–979.Google Scholar
Clarke, D.W. (1997). TRIZ: Through the Eyes of an American TRIZ Specialist. Southfield, MI: Ideation.Google Scholar
Collins, A.M., & Loftus, E.F. (1975). A spreading activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review 82(6), 407–428.Google Scholar
Dahl, D.W., & Moreau, P. (2002). The influence and value of analogical thinking during new product ideation. Journal of Marketing Research 39(1), 47–60.Google Scholar
Dong, A., & Sarkar, S. (2011). Unfixing design fixation: from cause to computer simulation. Journal of Creative Behavior 45(2), 147–159.Google Scholar
Duncker, K. (1945). On problem solving. Psychological Monographs 58(5), i–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erickson, K.A., Krampe, R.T., & Clemens, T. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review 100(3), 363–406.Google Scholar
Gero, J.S. (2000). Research methods for design science research: computational and cognitive approaches. Unpublished manuscript, University of Sydney.Google Scholar
Gero, J.S. (2011). Fixation and commitment while designing and its measurement. Journal of Creative Behavior 45(2), 108–115.Google Scholar
Ghaith, G., & Yaghi, H. (1997). Relationships among experience, teacher efficacy, and attitudes towards the implementation of instructional innovation. Teaching and Teacher Education 13(4), 451–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldschmidt, G. (2011). Avoiding design fixation: transformation and abstraction in mapping from source to target. Journal of Creative Behavior 45(2), 92–100.Google Scholar
Gordon, W. (1961). Synectics: The Development of Creative Capacity. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Grant, D.A, & Berg, E.A. (1948). A behavioral analysis of degree of reinforcement and case of shifting to new responses in a Weigl-type card sorting problem. Journal of Experimental Psychology 38(4), 404–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwald, A.G., Klinger, M.R., & Schuh, E.S. (1995). Activation by marginally perceptible (“subliminal”) stimuli: dissociation of unconscious from conscious cognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 124(1), 22–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Humphrey, N. (2011). Soul Dust: The Magic of Consciousness. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jansson, D.G., & Smith, S.M. (1991). Design fixation. Design Studies 12(1), 3–11.Google Scholar
Kershaw, T.C., & Ohlsson, S. (2004). Multiple causes of difficulty in insight: the case of the nine-dot problem. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 30(1), 3–13.Google Scholar
Kicinger, R., Arciszewski, T., & De Jong, K.A. (2005). Evolutionary computation and structural design: a survey of the state of the art. Computers & Structures 83(23–24), 1943–1978.Google Scholar
Kolodner, J. (1993). Case-Based Reasoning. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
Linsey, J.S., Tseng, I., Fu, K., Cagan, J., Wood, K.L., & Schunn, C. (2010). A study of design fixation, its mitigation and perception in engineering design faculty. Journal of Mechanical Design 132, 041003.Google Scholar
Luchins, A. (1942). Mechanization in problem solving: the effect of einstellung. Psychological Monographs 54(6), 1–17.Google Scholar
Lumsdaine, E., & Lumsdaine, M. (1995). Creative Problem Solving: Thinking Skills for a Changing World. New York: McGraw–Hill.Google Scholar
Maher, M.L., & Gomez de Silva Garza, A. (1997). Case-based reasoning in design. IEEE Expert: Intelligent Systems and Their Applications 12(2), 34–41.Google Scholar
Maier, N.R.F. (1931). Reasoning in humans: II. The solution of a problem and its appearance in consciousness. Journal of Comparative Psychology 12(2), 181–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, R.L., & Bower, G.H. (1993). Eliciting cryptomnesia: unconscious plagiarism in a puzzle task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 19(3), 673–688.Google Scholar
Marsh, R.L., & Landau, J.D. (1995). Item availability in cryptomnesia: assessing its role in two paradigms of unconscious plagiarism. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 21(6), 1568–1582.Google Scholar
Marsh, R.L., Ward, T.B., & Landau, J.D. (1999). The inadvertent use of prior knowledge in a generative cognitive task. Memory & Cognition 27(1), 94–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohlsson, S. (1992). The learning curve for writing books: evidence from Professor Asimov. Psychological Science 3(6), 380–382.Google Scholar
Ohlsson, S. (2011). Deep Learning: How the Mind Overrides Experience. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pahl, G., & Beitz, W. (1996). Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach. London: Springer.Google Scholar
Pratkanis, A.R. (1992). The cargo-cult science of subliminal persuasion. Skeptical Inquirer 16(3), 260–272.Google Scholar
Purcell, A.T., & Gero, J.S. (1996). Design and other types of fixation. Design Studies 17(4), 363–383.Google Scholar
Rutchick, A.M., Slepian, M.L., & Ferris, B.D. (2010). The pen is mightier than the word: object priming of evaluative standards. European Journal of Social Psychology 40(5), 704–708.Google Scholar
Schon, D.A. (1988). Designing: rules, types and worlds. Design Studies 9(3), 181–190.Google Scholar
Sedikides, C., Wildschut, T., Arndt, J., & Routledge, C. (2008). Nostalgia: past, present, and future. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(5), 304–307.Google Scholar
Slepian, M.L., Weisbuch, M., Rutchick, A.M., Newman, L.S., & Ambady, N. (2010). Shedding light on insight: priming bright ideas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 46(4), 696–700.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, M.A., Youmans, R.J., Bellows, B.G., & Peterson, M.S. (2013). Shifting the focus: an objective look at design fixation. In Design, User Experience, and Usability. Design Philosophy, Methods, and Tools (pp. 144–151). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Smith, S.M., & Linsey, J. (2011). A three-pronged approach for overcoming design fixation. Journal of Creative Behavior 45(2), 83–91.Google Scholar
Smith, S.M., Ward, T.B., & Schumacher, J.S. (1993). Constraining effects of examples in a creative generation task. Memory & Cognition 21(6), 837–845.Google Scholar
Stempfle, J. (2011). Overcoming organizational fixation: creating and sustaining an innovation culture. Journal of Creative Behavior 45(2), 116–129.Google Scholar
Taylor, D.W., Berry, P.C., & Block, C.H. (1958). Does group participation when using brainstorming facilitate or inhibit creative thinking? Administrative Science Quarterly 3(1), 22–47.Google Scholar
Verwijmeren, T., Karremans, J.C., Bernritter, S.F., Stroebe, W., & Wigboldus, D.H. (2013). Warning: you are being primed! The effect of a warning on the impact of subliminal ads. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 49(6), 1124–1129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viswanathan, V.K., Esposito, N., & Linsey, J. (2012). Training tomorrow's designers: a study on design fixation. Proc. ASEE Annual Conf., San Antonio, TX.Google Scholar
Weir, W. (1984, October 15). Another look at subliminal “facts.” Advertising Age 55, 46.Google Scholar
Yilmaz, S., Seifert, C.M., & Gonzalez, R. (2010). Cognitive heuristics in design: instructional strategies to increase creativity in idea generation. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 24(3), 335–355.Google Scholar
Youmans, R.J. (2010). The effects of physical prototyping and group work on the reduction of design fixation. Design Studies 32(2), 115–138.Google Scholar
Youmans, R.J. (2011). Design fixation in the wild: design environments and their influence on fixation. Journal of Creative Behavior 45(2), 101–107.Google Scholar
Youmans, R.J., & Jee, B.D. (2007). Fudging the numbers: distributing chocolate influences student evaluations of an undergraduate course. Teaching of Psychology 34(4), 245–247.Google Scholar
Youmans, R.J., & Stone, E.R. (2005). To thy own self be true: finding the utility of cognitive feedback via extended mean squared error analysis. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 18(5), 319–341.Google Scholar
Yuemin, H. (2011). Promoting public spaces of campus for the development of creativity. China Electric Power Education 26, 18–19.Google Scholar
Zwicky, F. (1969). Discovery, Invention, Research Through the Morpho-logical Analysis. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar