Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T16:26:17.733Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Dynamic Changes in Receptive Fields Induced by Cortical Reorganization

from Part Two - Information Theory and Artificial Networks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2010

Roland Baddeley
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Peter Hancock
Affiliation:
University of Stirling
Peter Földiák
Affiliation:
University of St Andrews, Scotland
Get access

Summary

Introduction

It has been experimentally observed that the receptive fields (RF) of cortical cells have a dynamic nature. For instance, it was found that some time (of the order of minutes) after the occurrence of a retinal lesion the area of the RF increased by a factor of order 5 (Gilbert and Wiesel, 1992), and that cortical cells with their classical RF inside the damaged region recovered their activity. A similar effect can be obtained without the existence of real lesions. Stimuli can emulate the lesion if they are localized; that is, if there is some small part of input space that receives stimulation strongly different from their surround. Lack of stimulation in a small region of the visual space produces an effect similar to a scotoma. Experiments with localized stimuli have been done in both the visual (Pettet and Gilbert, 1992) and the somatosensory systems (Jenkins et al., 1990).

These changes in the RFs of cortical neurons can be quantitatively studied with psychophysical experiments. For instance, changes in RF sizes are reflected in a systematic bias in feature localization tasks. It has been found (Kapadia et al., 1994) that the ability to determine the relative position of a short line segment in the middle of another two, presented close to the border of the artificial scotoma, was strongly biased in a way that is consistent with the expansion of RFs of neurons in the cortical scotoma.

It has been speculated (Gilbert, 1992; Pettet and Gilbert, 1992) that the expansion of RF sizes is responsible for the perceptual filling-in effect (Ramachandran and Gregory, 1991) and other visual illusions.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×