Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

AI paradigms

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this paper is comparative analysis of most important AI paradigms. An AI paradigm is defined as the pair composed by a concept of intelligence and a methodology in which intelligent computer systems are developed and operated. Three paradigms, the behaviourist paradigm, the agent paradigm, and the artificial life paradigm are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arkin, R. C. (1995) Intelligent robotic systems. IEEE Expert, 10(2), 6–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J. L. (1962) How to Do Things with Words, Oxford Uni-versity Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, J. (1994) The role of emotion in believable agents. Co-mmunications of the ACM, 37(7), 122–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, N. (1996) The mind as the software of the brain. In Invi-tation to Cognitive Science (new edition), Osherson, D. et al. (eds), 3 vols, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratman, M. E., Israel, D. J. and Pollack, M. E. (1988) Plans and resource-bounded practical reasoning. Computational Intel-ligence, 4, 349–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cog, the Robot (1997) The Cog Documentation project. The COG Shop.2

  • Dawson, M. R. W. (1997) Weak equivalence, in Dawson, M. R. W. and Medler, D. A. (eds), The University of Alberta's Cognitive Science Dictionary.3

  • Dennett, D. (1988) Evolution, error and intentionality, in Sourcebook on the Foundations of Artificial Intelligence, Wilks, Y. and Partridge, D. (eds), New Mexico University Press.

  • Dennett, D. C. (1987) The International Stance, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. C. (1994) The practical requirements for making a conscious robot. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, A, 349, 133–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. and Haugeland J. (1987) Intentionality, in The Ox-ford Companion to the Mind, Gregory, L. R. (ed.), Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, J. and Dean, T. (eds) (1994) Strategic directions in artificial intelligence. ACM Computing Surveys, 28(4), 653–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, O., Lesh, N. and Segal, R. (1994) Building softbots for UNIX, in Software Agents-Papers from the 1994 Spring Symposium, Etzioni, O. (ed.). Technical Report SS–94–03, AAAI Press, pp. 9–16.

  • Etzioni, O. and Weld, D. (1995) Intelligent agents on the Internet: fact, fiction, and forecast. IEEE Expert, 10(4), 44–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feigenbaum, E. A., Buchanan, B. and Lederberg, J. (1971) On generality a problem solving: a case using the DENDRAL program. Machine Intelligence, 6, 165–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fieser, J. (ed.) (1997) The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.4

  • Fikes, R. E. and Nilsson, N. J. (1971) STRIPS: A new approach to the application of theorem proving to problem solving. Artificial Intelligence, 2, 189–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firby, R. J. (1997) Opening the door to robotic agents. IEEE Expert Intelligent Systems and Their Applications, 2(12), 7–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, J. (1994) Internet robots: structure from anarchy? 5

  • Franklin, S. and Graesser, A. (1996) Is it an agent, or just a program?: a taxonomy for autonomous agents, in Proceed-ings of the Third International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages, Springer-Verlag.6

  • Galliers, J. R. (1988) A theoretical framework for computer models of cooperative dialogue, acknowledging multi-agent conflict, Ph.D. thesis, Open University, UK.

  • Genesereth, M. R. and Ketchpel, S. P. (1994) Software agents. Communications of the ACM, 37(7), 48–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genesereth, M. R. and Nilsson, N. J. (1987) Logical Foundations of Artificial Intelligence, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossen, B. (1996) Search engines: what they are, how they work, and practical suggestions for getting the most out of them.7

  • Gutowitz, H. A. (1994) Artificial life simulators and their appli-cations, technical report.8

  • Harnad, S. (1993). Problems, problems: the frame problem as a symptom of the symbol grounding problem. Commentary on Van Brakel and Fetzer on Ford & Hayes on the Frame Problem. PSYCOLOQUY, 4(34), frame-problem.11.

  • Holand, J. (1992) Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence, 2nd edn, MIT Press/Bradford Books, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, A. (1997) Learning, deliberating, planning: an investiga-tion of rational agent architectures, to Computer Science and Philosophy in partial fulfillment of the honors requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts, Harvard College, Cam-bridge, MA.9

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitano, H. (1996) Nausicaä and the Sirens: a tale of two intelli-gent autonomous agents. IEEE Expert, 11(6), 60–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laird, J. E., Newell, A. and Rosenbloom, P. S. (1987) SOAR: an architecture for general intelligence. Artificial Intelligence, 33, 1–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langton, C. (ed.) (1994) Artificial Life, Addison-Wesley, Red-wood City, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenat, B. D. and Feigenbaum, E. A. (1991) On the thresholds of knowledge. Artificial Intelligence, 47, 185–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maes, P. (1994a) Agents that reduce work and information overload. Communications of the ACM, 37(7), 31–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maes, P. (1994b). Social interface agents: acquiring competence by learning from users and other agents, in Software Agents-Papers from the 1994 Spring Symposium, Etzioni, O. (ed.) Technical Report SS–94–03, AAAI Press, pp. 71–78.

  • Maes, P. (1995) Artificial life meets entertainment: interacting with lifelike autonomous agents. Communications of the ACM, 38(11), 108–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauldin, M. L. (1994) Chatterbots, tinymuds, and the Turing test: entering the loebner Prize Competition, in Proceedings of the AAAI 1994 Conference, MIT Press, pp. 16–21.10

  • McCarthy, J. (1978) Ascribing mental qualities to machines, technical report, AI laboratory, Stanford University.11

  • McCarthy, J. (1990) Some expert systems need commonsense. In Formalizing Common Sense Papers by John McCarthy, Lifschitz, V. (ed.), Norwood, NJ, Ablex, pp. 189–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. (1997b) What is artificial intelligence? Stanford University.12

  • Moukas, A. G. (1995) Learning and group behaviour in interacting agents, M.Sc. Information Technology: Knowledge Based Systems, Intelligent Robotics Theme, Department of Artifi-cial Intelligence, University of Edinburgh.13

  • Newell, A. (1982) The knowledge level. Artificial Intelligence, 18, 87–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A. and Simon, H. A. (1963) GPS, a program that simu-lates human thought, in Computers and Thought, Feigenbaum, E. A. and Feldman, J. (eds), MaGraw, Hill, New York, pp. 279–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, N. J. (1995) Eye on the prize. Online version (to be submitted to AI Magazine).

  • Parnas, D. L. and Clements, P. C. (1986) A rational design pro-cess: how and why to fake it. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Se-12(2), 251–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, G. (1997) CLIPS: a tool for building expert systems.14

  • Rocha, L. M. (1997) SSIE 580B: Evolutionary systems and arti-ficial life, lecture Notes, Department of Systems Science, State University of New York at Binghamton, Binghamton, NY.15

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenschein, J. S. and Genesereth, M. R. (1985) Deals among rational agents, in Proceedings of the Ninth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-85), Los Angeles, CA, pp. 91–99.

  • Russel, S. J. and Norvig, P. (1995) Artificial Intelligence. A Modern Approach. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. (1980) Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 417–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selman, B., Brooks, R. A., Dean, T., Horvitz, F., Mitchell, T. M. and Nilsson, N. J. (1996) Challenge problems for artificial intelligence, in Proceedings of AAAI-96, Thirteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Portland, Oregon, August 1996. AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA, pp. 1340–1345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sipper, M. (1996) What is artificial life?16

  • Turing, A. M. (1950) Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, 59, 433–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verschure, F. M. J. (1993) Formal minds and biological brain. AI and Edelman's extended theory of neuronal group selection. IEEE Expert, 8(5), 66–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watling, C. P. (1997) Intention, in The University of Alberta's Cognitive Science Dictionary, Dawson, M. R. W. and Medler, D. A. (eds).17

  • Weizenbaum, J. (1966) ELIZA-a computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine. Communications of the ACM, 9, 36–45.18

    Google Scholar 

  • Weizenbaum, J. (1976) Computer Power and Human Reason: From Judgment to Calculation, Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, J. E. (1994) Telescript technology: The foundation for the electronic marketplace, White paper, General Magic, Inc., 2465 Latham Street, Mountain View, CA 94040.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, M. and Jennings, N. (1995) Intelligent agents: theory and practice. Knowledge Engineering Review, 2(10), 115–152.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Software Engineering Department, Institute of Mathematics and Informatics, Akademijos 4, 2600, Vilnius, Lithuania

    ALBERTAS ČAPLINSKAS

Authors
  1. ALBERTAS ČAPLINSKAS
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

ČAPLINSKAS, A. AI paradigms. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 9, 493–502 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008880017722

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008880017722

Search

Navigation