Abstract
One of the main problems with virtual reality as a learning tool is that there are hardly any theories or models upon which to found and justify the application development. This paper presents a model that defends the metaphorical design of educational virtual reality systems. The goal is to build virtual worlds capable of embodying the knowledge to be taught: the metaphorical structuring of abstract concepts looks for bodily forms of expression in order to make knowledge accessible to students. The description of a case study aimed at learning scientific categorization serves to explain and implement the process of metaphorical projection. Our proposals are based on Lakoff and Johnson's theory of cognition, which defends the conception of the embodied mind, according to which most of our knowledge relies on basic metaphors derived from our bodily experience.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Anderson, J.R. (1983). The Architecture of Cognition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Bowman, D.A. and Hodges, L. F. (1999). Formalizing the design, evaluation, and application of interaction techniques for immersive virtual environments. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 10, 37-53.
Bricken, M. (1991). Virtual worlds: No interface to design. In Cyberspace: First steps, M. Benedikt (ed), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Byrne, C.M. (1996). Water on tap: The Use of Virtual Reality as an Educational Tool. Ph. D. Dissertation, Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Chatwin, B. (1987). The Songlines. Jonathan Cape, London.
Fairchild, K.M. Hai, B. Loo, J. Hern, N. and Serra, L. (1993). The heaven and earth virtual reality: Designing applic ations for novice users. In Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium (VRAIS). Edited by the IEEE Service Center Piscataway, NJ, pp. 47-53.
Hand, C. (1997). A survey of 3D interaction techniques. Computer Graphics Forum, 16(5), 269-281.
Holyoak, K.J. and Thagard, P. (1995). Mental Leaps: Analogy in Creative Thought. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Johnson, M. (1987). The Body in the Mind. Chicago University Press, Chicago.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. Chicago University Press, Chicago.
Lakoff, G. (1994). What is metaphor? In Advances in Connectionist and Neural Computation Theory: Analogy, Metaphor, and Reminding, J.A. Barnden and K.J. Holyoak (eds), vol. 3, Ablex Publishing, Norwood, NJ pp. 203-258.
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago University Press, Chicago.
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. Basic Books, New York.
Lund, A. and Waterworth, J.A. (1998). Experiential design: Reflecting embodiment at the interface. Computation for Metaphors, Analogy and Agents: An International Workshop, University of Aizu, Japan.
Mayer, R.E. (1993). The instructive metaphor: Metaphoric aids to students' understanding of science. In Metaphor and Thought, A. Ortony (ed), 2nd edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Osberg, K.M. (1997). Constructivism in practice: The case for meaning-making in the virtual world. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Education, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Poupyrev, I. and Ichikawa, T. (1999). Manipulating objects in virtual worlds: Categorization and empirical evaluation of interaction techniques. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 10, 19-35.
Radman, K. (1997). Metaphors: Figures of the Mind. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Stanney, K.M. (1995). Realizing the full potential of virtual reality: Human factors issues that could stand in the way. In Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium. IEEE Computer Society Press, Research Triangle Park, NC, pp. 28-34.
Ware, C. and Osborne, S. (1990). Exploration and virtual camera control in virtual three dimensional environments. Computer Graphics, 24(2), 175-183.
Waterworth, J.A. (1997). Personal spaces: 3D spatial worlds for information exploration, organisation and communication. In The Internet in 3D, R. Earnshaw and J. Vince (eds), Academic Press, New York.
Winn, W. (1997). The impact of three-dimensional immersive virtual environments on modern pedagogy. HITL Technical Report R-97-15. Human Interface Technology Laboratory, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Yates, F.A. (1984). The Art of Memory. (First published in 1966). Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Youngblut, C. (1998). Educational uses of virtual reality technology. IDA Document D-2128. Institute for Defense Analyses, Alexandria, Virginia.
Zeltzer, D. (1992). Autonomy, interaction and presence. Presence, 1, 127-132.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sánchez, Á., María Barreiro, J. & Maojo, V. Design of Virtual Reality Systems for Education: A Cognitive Approach. Education and Information Technologies 5, 345–362 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012061809603
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012061809603