Skip to main content
Log in

Digitizing uncertainty modeling for reverse engineering applications: regression versus neural networks

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The coordinate measuring machine is one of the two types of digitizers most popularly used in reverse engineering. A number of factors affect the digitizing uncertainty, such as travel speeds of the probe, pitch values (sampling points), probe angles (part orientations), probe sizes, and feature sizes. A proper selection of these parameters in a digitization or automatic inspection process can improve the digitizing accuracy for a given coordinate-measuring machine. To do so, some empirical models or decision rules are required. This paper applies and compares the nonlinear regression analysis and neural network modeling methods in developing empirical models for estimating the digitizing uncertainty. The models developed in this research can aid error prediction, accuracy improvement, and operation parameter selection in computer-aided reverse engineering and automatic inspection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alrashdan, A., Motavalli, S. and Fallahi, B. (2000) Automatic segmentation of digitized data for reverse engineering applications. IIE Transactions on Design and Manufacturing, 32, 59-69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balsamo, A., Marques, D. and Sartori, S. (1990) A method for thermal-deformation corrections of CMMs. Annals of CIRP, 39, 557-560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosch, T., Harlow, R. and Thompson, R. L. (1998) Fundamentals of Dimensional Metrology, 3rd Edn, Delmar Publishers, Albany, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Box, G. E. P. and Draper, N. R. (1987) Empirical Model-Building and Response Surfaces, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coit, D. W., Jackson, B. T. and Smith, A. E. (1998) Static neural network process models: considerations and case studies. International Journal of Production Research, 36(11), 2953-2967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, C. and Wood, F. S. (1980) Fitting Equations to Data: Computer Analysis of Multifactor Data, 2nd Edn, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng, C.-X. and Pandey, V. (2002) An Experimental study of the effect of digitizing parameters on digitizing uncertainty with a CMM. International Journal of Production Research, 40(3), 687-697.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gershenfeld, N. (1999) The Nature of Mathematical Modeling, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, R. V. and Ledolter, J. (1992) Applied Statistics for Engineers and Physical Scientists, 2nd Edn, Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunzmann, H., Trapet, E. and Wäldele, F. (1990) A uniform concept for calibration, acceptance test, and periodic inspection of coordinate measuring machines using reference objects. Annals of the CIRP, 39(1), 561-564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreuci, J. V. (1990) CMM measurement enhancement using probe compensation algorithms. SME Technical PaperMS90-09, SME, Dearborn, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, J. (1994) Introduction to Neural Networks: Design, Theory, and Applications, 6th Edn, California Scientific Software, Nevada City, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, M. and Petterson, A. (1998) BrainMaker User's Guide and Reference Manual, 7th Edn, California Scientific Software, Nevada City, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Z.-C. and Liu, Q. Y. (2000) A neural network-based algorithm that searches for measuring points of a rule surface. IIE Transactions on Design and Manufacturing, 32, 333-343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matinez, S. E., Smith, A. E. and Bidanda, B. (1994) Reducing waste in casting with a predictive neural model. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 5(4), 277-286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minitab (19XX) Minitab Reference Manual, PC Version. Minitab Inc., State College, PA.

  • Montgomery, D. C. (2001) Design and Analysis of Experiments, 5th Edn, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon, H.-S. and Na, S.-J. (1997) Optimum design based on mathematical model and neural network to predict weld parameters for fillet joints. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 16(1), 13-23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petri, K. L., Billo, R. E. and Bidanda, B. (1998) A neural network process model for abrasive flow machining operations. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 17(1), 52-64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, S. and Zhang, G. X. (1995) Geometric error measurement and compensation of machines. Annals of the CRIP, 44(2), 599-609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen, Y.-L. and Zhang, X.-P. (1999) Pretravel compensation for horizontally oriented touch trigger probes with straight styli. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 18(3), 175-186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. E. (1993) Predicting product quality with back propagation: A thermoplastic injection molding case study. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 8(4), 252-257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. E. and Mason, A. K. (1997) Cost estimation predictive modeling: regression versus neural network. The Engineering Economist, 42(2), 137-161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X. and Feng, C.-X. (2001) An error prediction model for digitization with a coordinate measuring machine. Presented at the 2001 Industrial Engineering Research Conference, Dallas, TX, May.

  • Weckenmann, A., Knauer, M. and Kunzmann, H. (1998) The influence of measurement strategy on the uncertainty of CMM-measurements. CIRP Annals, 47(1), 451-454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, M. and Lee, E. (2000) Improved neural network models for reverse engineering. International Journal of Production Research, 38(9), 2067-2078.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yarlagadda, P. K. D. V. (2000) Prediction of die casting process parameters by using an artificial neural network model for zinc alloy. International Journal of Production Research, 38(1), 119-139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yee, K. W. and Gavin, R. J. (1990) Implementing fast part probing and error compensation on machine tools. NIST Report 4447, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, G., Veale, R., Charlton, T., Borchardt, B. and Hocken, R. (1985) Error compensation of coordinate measuring machines. CIRP Annals, 34(1), 445-448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, G.-X. and Zhang, Y.-F. (1991) A method for machine geometric calibration using 1-D ball array. Annals of the CIRP, 40(1), 519-522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, H.-C. and Huang, S. H. (1995) Applications of neural network applications in manufacturing: a state-of-the-art survey. International Journal of Production Research, 33, 705-728.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, E. P. and Harrison, D. K. (1999) Improving error compensation via a fuzzy-neural hybrid model. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 18(5), 335-344.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Feng, CX.(., Wang, X. Digitizing uncertainty modeling for reverse engineering applications: regression versus neural networks. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 13, 189–199 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015734805987

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015734805987

Navigation