Skip to main content
Log in

Characterizable fuzzy preference structures

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we study the existence, construction and reconstruction of fuzzy preferencestructures. Starting from the definition of a classical preference structure, we propose anatural definition of a fuzzy preference structure, merely requiring the fuzzification of theset operations involved. Upon evaluating the existence of these structures, we discover thatthe idea of fuzzy preferences is best captured when fuzzy preference structures are definedusing a L Ú ukasiewicz triplet. We then proceed to investigate the role of the completenesscondition in these structures. This rather extensive investigation leads to the proposal of astrongest completeness condition, and results in the definition of a one-parameter class offuzzy preference structures. Invoking earlier results by Fodor and Roubens, the constructionof these structures from a reflexive binary fuzzy relation is then easily obtained. Thereconstruction of such a structure from its fuzzy large preference relation inevitable toobtain a full characterization of these structures in analogy to the classical case is morecumbersome. The main result of this paper is the discovery of a non-trivial characterizingcondition that enables us to fully characterize the members of a two-parameter class offuzzy preference structures in terms of their fuzzy large preference relation. As a remarkableside-result, we discover three limit classes of characterizable fuzzy preference structures,traces of which are found throughout the preference modelling literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. C. Alsina, On a family of connectives for fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 16(1985)231–235.

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. Bouyssou, Ranking methods based on valued preference relations: A characterization of the net flow method, European Journal of Operational Research 61(1992)186–194.

    Google Scholar 

  3. B. De Baets and B. Van de Walle, Weak and strong fuzzy interval orders, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 79(1996)213 – 225.

    Google Scholar 

  4. B. De Baets, B. Van de Walle and E. Kerre, Fuzzy preference structures and their characterization, The Journal of Fuzzy Mathematics 3(1995)373– 381.

    Google Scholar 

  5. B. De Baets, B. Van de Walle and E. Kerre, Fuzzy preference structures without incomparability, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 76(1995)333 – 348.

    Google Scholar 

  6. B. De Baets, B. Van de Walle and E. Kerre, The Frank t-norm family in fuzzy preference modelling, in: Proceedings of the 4th European Congress on Intelligent Techniques and Soft Computing (Aachen, Germany, September 1996), ed. H.-J. Zimmermann, Vol. 1, ELITE, Aachen, 1996, pp. 78 – 82.

    Google Scholar 

  7. B. De Baets, B. Van de Walle and E. Kerre, A plea for the use of Łukasiewicz triplets in fuzzy preference structures. Part 2: The identity case, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, to appear.

  8. J.-P. Doignon, B. Monjardet, M. Roubens and Ph. Vincke, Biorder families, valued relations and preference modelling, J. of Math. Psychology 30(1986)435 – 480.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. Fodor, An axiomatic approach to fuzzy preference modelling, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 52(1992) 47 – 52.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Fodor and M. Roubens, Preference modelling and aggregation procedures with valued binary relations, in: Fuzzy Logic: State of the Art, eds. R. Lowen and M. Roubens, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1993, pp. 29– 38.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Fodor and M. Roubens, Fuzzy Preference Modelling and Multicriteria Decision Support, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. Fodor and M. Roubens, Valued preference structures, European Journal of Operational Research 79(1994)277 – 286.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. Frank, On the simultaneous associativity of F(x, y) and x + yF(x, y), Aequationes Mathematicae 19(1979)194 – 226.

    Google Scholar 

  14. E.-P. Klement, R. Mesiar and E. Pap, Triangular Norms, in preparation.

  15. J. Montero, Social welfare functions in a fuzzy environment, Kybernetes 16(1987)241 – 245.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Montero, J. Tejada and V. Cutello, Fuzzy preferences in knowledge-based systems, in: Foundations and Applications of Possibility Theory, eds. G. De Cooman, D. Ruan and E. Kerre, Proceedings of the International Workshop on the Foundations and Applications of Possibility Theory (Gent, Belgium, December 1995), World Scientific, Singapore, 1995, pp. 316 – 321.

    Google Scholar 

  17. S. Orlovski, Decision-making with a fuzzy preference relation, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 1(1978) 155 – 167.

    Google Scholar 

  18. S. Orlovski, Calculus of Decomposable Properties, Fuzzy Sets, and Decisions, Allerton Press, New York, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  19. S. Ovchinnikov and V. Ozernoy, Using fuzzy binary relations for identifying noninferior decision alternatives, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 25(1988)21 – 32.

    Google Scholar 

  20. S. Ovchinnikov, Modelling valued preference relations, in: Multiperson Decision Making Using Fuzzy Sets and Possibility Theory, eds. J. Kacprzyk and M. Fedrizzi, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1990, pp. 64 – 70.

    Google Scholar 

  21. S. Ovchinnikov and M. Roubens, On strict preference relations, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 43(1991) 319 –326.

    Google Scholar 

  22. S. Ovchinnikov and M. Roubens, On fuzzy strict preference, indifference and incomparability relations, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 47(1992)313 – 318; 49(1992)15 – 20.

    Google Scholar 

  23. P. Perny and B. Roy, The use of fuzzy outranking relations in preference modelling, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 49(1992)33 –53.

    Google Scholar 

  24. M. Roubens and Ph. Vincke, Preference Modeling, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems 250, Springer, Berlin, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  25. B. Schweizer and A. Sklar, Probabilistic Metric Spaces, Elsevier Science, New York, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  26. E. Trillas, Sobre funciones de negación en la teoriá de conjuntos diffusos, Stochastica 3(1979) 47 – 59.

    Google Scholar 

  27. B. Van de Walle, The existence and characterization of fuzzy preference structures, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Gent, 1996 (in Dutch).

  28. B. Van de Walle, B. De Baets and E. Kerre, On the existence, construction and characterization of fuzzy preference structures, in: Proceedings of the 6th International Fuzzy Systems Association World Congress (Saő Paulo, Brazil, July 1995), Vol. 2, 1995, pp. 141 – 144.

    Google Scholar 

  29. B. Van de Walle, B. De Baets and E. Kerre, Recent advances in fuzzy preference modelling, in: Intelligent Systems and Soft Computing for Nuclear Science and Industry, eds. D. Ruan, P. D'hondt, P. Govaerts and E. Kerre, Proceedings of the 2nd International FLINS Workshop (Mol, Belgium, September 1996), World Scientific, Singapore, 1996, pp. 98 – 104.

    Google Scholar 

  30. B. Van de Walle, B. De Baets and E. Kerre, A plea for the use of Łukasiewicz triplets in fuzzy preference structures. Part 1: General argumentation, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, to appear.

  31. B. Van de Walle, B. De Baets and E. Kerre, A comparative study of completeness conditions in fuzzy preference structures, in: Proceedings of the 7th International Fuzzy Systems Association Congress (Prague, Czech Republic, June, 1997), Vol. 3, 1997, pp. 74 – 79.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van de Walle, B., De Baets, B. & Kerre, E. Characterizable fuzzy preference structures. Annals of Operations Research 80, 105–136 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018903628661

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018903628661

Keywords

Navigation