Abstract
This paper is concerned with make‐to‐stock pull control policies. A classical policy is the kanban policy. Another policy, very easy to implement, is the base stock policy. These two policies contain one design parameter per stage. A general control policy, known as the generalized kanban policy, can also be used to implement the pull mechanism. The generalized kanban policy includes, as special cases, the kanban and the base stock policies. This policy uses two parameters for each stage of the production system. The aim of this paper is to provide qualitative and quantitative comparisons of these three policies. The results of our study will help to choose the policy to implement in order to control a production system. We give practical rules. We also show that if there is no delay in filling orders, all three policies have similar costs. However, for the systems studied, we show that, if there is a delay in filling orders, generalized kanban systems and base stock systems yield close to optimal costs, which are lower than costs of kanban systems for the same service quality.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
S. Axs¨ater and K. Rosling, Installation vs. echelon stock policies for multi-level inventory control, Management Science 39 (1993) 1274–1280.
S. Axs¨ater and K. Rosling, Ranking of generalized multi-stage kanban policies, European Journal of Operational Research (to appear).
J.F. Bard and B. Golany, Determining the number of kanbans in a multiproduct, multistage production system, International Journal of Production Research 29(5) (1991) 881–895.
B. Berkley, Setting minimum performance levels for two-card kanban-controlled lines, International Journal of Production Research 31(5) (1993) 1003–1021.
A.M. Bonvik, Performance analysis of manufacturing systems under hybrid control policies, Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139 (1996).
A.M. Bonvik, C. Couch and S.B. Gershwin, A comparison of production line control mechanisms, International Journal of Production Research 35 (1996) 789–804.
J.A. Buzacott, Queueing models of kanban and MRP controlled production systems, Engineering Cost and Production Economics 17 (1989) 3–20.
J.A. Buzacott, S.M. Price and J.G. Shanthikumar, Service level in multistage MRP and base stock controlled production systems, in: Proceedings of the Conference on New Directions for Operations Research in Manufacturing (1991).
J.A. Buzacott and J.G. Shanthikumar, A general approach for coordinating production in multiplecell manufacturing systems, Production and Operations Management 1(1) (1992) 34–52.
Y. Dallery and G. Liberopoulos, A new kanban-type pull control mechanism for multi-stage manufacturing systems, in: Proceedings of the European Control Conference (ECC'95), Rome, Italy (September 1995).
W.J. Davis and S.J. Stubitz, Configuring a kanban system using a discrete optimization of mutiple stochastic responses, International Journal of Production Research 25(5) (1987) 721–740.
S.L. De Araujo, Sur l'analyse et le dimensionnement des syst'emes de production g´er´es en kanban, Ph.D. thesis of INPG at Laboratoire d'Automatique de Grenoble (1994).
M. Di Mascolo, Mod´elisation et evaluation de performances de syst'emes de production g´er´es en kanban, Ph.D. thesis of INPG at Laboratoire d'Automatique de Grenoble (1990).
M. Di Mascolo, Y. Frein, B. Baynat and Y. Dallery, Queueing network modeling and analysis of generalized kanban systems, in: 2nd European Control Conference (ECC'93), Groningen, The Netherlands (1993) pp. 170–175.
M. Di Mascolo, Y. Frein and Y. Dallery, An analytical method for performance evaluation of kanban controlled production systems, Operations Research 44(1) (1996).
C. Duri, M. Di Mascolo and Y. Frein, Etude d'un cas particulier de la gestion kanban g´en´eralis´e, Internal report LAG (1995).
C. Duri, M. Di Mascolo and Y. Frein, On the analysis of base stock systems, in: Computer Integrated Manufacturing and Automation Technology (CIMAT'96), Grenoble (29–31 May 1996) pp. 290–295.
C. Duri, Etude comparative de gestions 'a flux tir´e, Ph.D. thesis of INPG at Laboratoire d'Automatique de Grenoble (1997).
Y. Frein, M. Di Mascolo and Y. Dallery, On the design of generalized kanban control systems, International Journal of Operation and Production Management 15(9) (1995).
Y.J. Lee and P. Zipkin, Tandem queues with planned inventories, Operations Research 40(5) (1992).
Y. Monden, Toyota Production System (Industrial Engineering and Management Press, 1983).
J.A. Muckstadt and S.R. Tayur, A comparison of alternative kanban control mechanisms, IIE Transactions 27 (1995) 140–161.
M.F. Neuts, Matrix Geometric Solutions in Stochastic Models (The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, London, 1981).
A. Svoronos and P. Zipkin, Evaluation of one-for-one replenishment policies for multi-echelon inventory systems, Management Science 37(1) (1991).
M. Veatch and L. Wein, Optimal control of a two-station tandem production/inventory system, Operations Research 42(2) (1994) 337–350.
H. Wang and H.P. Wang, Determining the number of kanbans: a step toward non-stock-production, International Journal of Production Research 28(11) (1990) 2101–2115.
R.W. Wolf, Poisson arrival see time averages, Operations Research 30 (1982) 223–231.
P. Zipkin, A kanban-like production control system: analysis of simple models, Research working paper no. 89–1, Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027 (1989).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Duri, C., Frein, Y. & Di Mascolo, M. Comparison among three pull control policies: kanban, base stock, and generalized kanban. Annals of Operations Research 93, 41–69 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018919806139
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018919806139