Skip to main content
Log in

Shop‐scheduling problems with fixed and non‐fixedmachine orders of the jobs

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper deals with the determination of an optimal schedule for the so‐calledmixed‐shopproblem when the makespan has to be minimized. In such a problem, some jobs havefixed machine orders (as in the job‐shop), while the operations of the otherjobs may be processed in arbitrary order (as in the open‐shop). We provebinary NP‐hardness of the preemptive problem with three machines and three jobs(two jobs have fixed machine orders and one may have an arbitrary machine order).We answer all other remaining open questions on the complexity status of mixed‐shopproblems with the makespan criterion by presenting different polynomial and pseudopolynomial algorithms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S.B. Akers and J. Friedman, A non-numerical approach to production scheduling problems, Oper. Res. 3(1955)429-442.

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. Brucker, An efficient algorithm for the job-shop problem with two jobs, Computing 40(1988)353-359.

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. Brucker, A polynomial algorithm for the two machine job-shop scheduling problem with fixed number of jobs, OR Spektrum 16(1994)5-7.

    Google Scholar 

  4. P. Brucker, Scheduling Algorithms, Springer, 1995.

  5. P. Brucker, S.A. Kravchenko and Yu.N. Sotskov, On the complexity of two machine job-shop scheduling with regular objective functions, OR Spektrum 19(1997)5-10.

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. Brucker, S.A. Kravchenko and Yu.N. Sotskov, Preemptive job-shop scheduling problems with a fixed number of jobs, Osnabrück Schrift. Math. Reihe P, Heft 184, Univ. Osnabrück, Osnabrück, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M.R. Garey and D.S. Johnson, Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness, W.H. Freeman, 1979.

  8. T. Gonzalez and S. Sahni, Open shop scheduling to minimize finish time, J. Assoc. Comput. Mach. 23(1976)665-679.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R.L. Graham, E.L. Lawler, J.K. Lenstra and A.H.G. Rinnooy Kan, Optimization and approximation in deterministic sequencing and scheduling: A survey, Ann. Discrete Math. 5(1979)287-326.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J.R. Jackson, An extension of Johnson's result on job lot scheduling, Naval Res. Logist. Quart. 3(1956)201-203.

    Google Scholar 

  11. S.A. Kravchenko and Yu.N. Sotskov, Optimal makespan schedule for three jobs on two machines, Z. Oper. Res. 43(1996)233-238.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J.K. Lenstra and A.H.G. Rinnooy Kan, Computational complexity of discrete optimization problems, Ann. Discrete Math. 4(1979)121-140.

    Google Scholar 

  13. T. Masuda, H. Ishii and T. Nishida, The mixed shop scheduling problem, Discrete Appl. Math. 11(1985)175-186.

    Google Scholar 

  14. N.V. Shakhlevich and Yu.N. Sotskov, Scheduling two jobs with fixed and nonfixed routines, Computing 52(1994)17-30.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yu.N. Sotskov, Optimal scheduling two jobs with regular criterion, in: Automating the Design Processes, Institute of Engineering Cybernetics, Minsk, Belarus, 1985, pp. 86-95 (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yu.N. Sotskov, The complexity of shop-scheduling problems with two or three jobs, European J. Oper. Res. 53(1991)326-336.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Yu.N. Sotskov and N.V. Shakhlevich, NP-hardness of shop-scheduling problems with three jobs, Discrete Appl. Math. 59(1995)237-266.

    Google Scholar 

  18. V.A. Strusevich, Two-machine super-shop scheduling problem, J. Oper. Res. Soc. 42(1991)479-492.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shakhlevich, N., Sotskov, N. & Werner, F. Shop‐scheduling problems with fixed and non‐fixedmachine orders of the jobs. Annals of Operations Research 92, 281–304 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018943016617

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018943016617

Keywords

Navigation