Skip to main content
Log in

Using dynamic models in management

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Patterns observable in variables and relationships from the physical sciences andengineering suggest, by analogy, a framework incorporating variables and relationshipsfrom the social sciences and management. The framework provides theoretical support forusing dynamic models in management, and may help to explain the behavior over time ofapparently unrelated variables like worker performance incentives and work in progressinventory. The framework also suggests a new analytical approach for the concept ofproductivity. An example illustrates the implementation of the concepts. This work sets thestage to building equation-based testable research hypotheses as a contribution to managementresearch.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S.N. Afriat, Efficiency estimation of production functions, International Economic Review 6(1972) 21–37.

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. Aigner, C.A.K. Lovell and P. Schmidt, Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production functions, Journal of Econometrics 13(1976)569–598.

    Google Scholar 

  3. C.I. Barnard, The Functions of the Executive, Harvard, Cambridge, MA, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  4. H.M. Blalock, Jr., Theory Construction, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R.H. Cannon, Jr., Dynamics of Physical Systems, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper and E. Rhodes, Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, European Journal of Operational Research 2(1978)429 – 444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. A. Charnes et al. (eds.), Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology, and Applications, Kluwer Academic, Boston, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  8. S.L. Chin, A mathematical model of human productivity versus encouragement, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-14(1984)302 – 304.

    Google Scholar 

  9. I. Cochin, Analysis and Design of Dynamic Systems, Harper and Row, New York, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. Fare, S. Grosskopf and C.A.K. Lovell, Measurement of Efficiency of Production, Kluwer-Nijhoff, Boston, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. Fare and C.A.K. Lovell, Measuring technical efficiency of production, Journal of Economic Theory 19(1978)150– 162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. M.J. Farrel, The measurement of productive efficiency, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A-120, Part 3(1957)253 – 281.

    Google Scholar 

  13. G.B. Feekes, The Hierarchy of Energy Systems, Pergamon, Oxford, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J.W. Forrester, Industrial Dynamics, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  15. G.F. Franklin, J.D. Powell and A. Emami-Naeini, Feedback Control of Dynamic Systems, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J.R.P. French, Jr. and B.H. Raven, The bases of social power, in: Group Dynamics: Research and Theory, eds. D. Cartwright and A. Zander, Evanston, IL, Row and Peterson, 1960, pp. 607 – 623.

    Google Scholar 

  17. S. French, An Introduction to the Mathematics of the Job Shop, Horwood, Chichester, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  18. W.L. French, F.E. Kast and J.E. Rosenzweig, Understanding Human Behavior in Organizations, Harper and Row, New York, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  19. E.M. Goldratt and J. Cox, The Goal, North River, Croton-on-Hudson, NY, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  20. P. Hersey and K.H. Blanchard, Management of Organizational Behavior, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  21. D. Katz and R.L. Kahn, The Social Psychology of Organizations, Wiley, New York, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  22. V. Kecman, State-Space Models of Lumped and Distributed Systems, Springer, Berlin, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  23. F.N. Kerlinger, Behavioral Research: A Conceptual Approach, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  24. J. Kimemia and S.B. Gershwin, An algorithm for the computer control of a flexible manufacturing system, IEEE Transactions 15(1983)353 – 362.

    Google Scholar 

  25. R. Kopp, The measurement of productive efficiency: A reconsideration, Quarterly Journal of Economics 96(1981)476 – 503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. J.G. March and H.A. Simon, Organizations, Wiley, New York, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  27. A.H. Maslow, Motivation and Personality, Harper and Row, New York, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  28. K.D. Mackenzie and R. House, Paradigm development in the social sciences: A proposed research strategy, Academy of Management Review (1978, January)7 – 23.

  29. P.M. Mendes and H.A. Kurstedt, Jr., Management statics and dynamics, in: Cybernetics and Systems '90, ed. R. Trapp, World Scientific, Singapore, 1990, pp. 617–624.

    Google Scholar 

  30. P.M. Mendes, H.A. Kurstedt, Jr., and H.J. Freeman, An information strategy is fundamental for sustained competitive advantage, in: Proceedings of the 9th Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Management, ASEM, Knoxville, TN, 1988, pp. 237 – 241.

  31. D.C. Miller, Handbook of Research Design and Social Measurement, 4th ed., Longman, New York, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  32. R.G. Murdick, MIS Concepts and Design, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  33. J.R. Platt, Strong Inference, Science 146(1964)347 – 353. Also in: Method and Analysis in Organizational Research, eds. T.S. Bateman and G.R. Ferris, Reston, Reston, VA, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  34. M. Schwaninger, Combining systems methods for coping with complexity, Proceedings of the EUROXV-INFORMSXXXIV Conference, Barcelona, 1997, pp. 267–293.

  35. P.M. Senge, The Fifth Discipline, Currency Doubleday, New York, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  36. H.A. Simon, On the application of servomechanism theory in the study of production control, Econometrica 20(1952)247 – 268. Also in: Managerial Applications of System Dynamics, ed. E.B. Roberts, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1978, pp. 95 – 115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. H.A. Simon, Administrative Behavior, Free Press, New York, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Systems Dynamics Society (ed.), International Systems Dynamics Conference Proceedings, Systems Dynamics Society, Lincoln, MA, 1984 – onward.

    Google Scholar 

  39. H. Tulkens and P. VanDen Eeckaut, Non-frontier measures of efficiency, Discussion Paper No. 9155, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics, Université Catholique de Louvain, 1991.

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mendes, P.M., Triantis, K.P. Using dynamic models in management. Annals of Operations Research 82, 185–203 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018954401770

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018954401770

Keywords

Navigation