Abstract
A continuous map of a forest resource is useful to visualize patterns not evident with point samples or as a layer in a geographic information system. Forest resource information is usually collected by ground inventories using point sampling, aerial photography, or remote sensing. Point sampling is expensive and time consuming. Less expensive aerial photography and remote sensing cannot provide the required detail. The tools of geostatistics can provide estimates at unsampled locations to create a continuous map of the forest resource. Two sequential simulation techniques, sequential Gaussian simulation and simulated annealing, are compared for locating pockets of high-value commercial trees in Pennsylvania. Both procedures capture the same trends, but simulated annealing is better than sequential Gaussian simulation at finding pockets of high-value commercial trees in Pennsylvania. Sequential Gaussian simulation is better at visualizing large-scale patterns and providing a quick solution. Simulated annealing requires more user time and should be used for projects requiring local detail.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
W.G. Cochran, Sampling Techniques (Wiley, New York, 1977).
C.V. Deutsch, Annealing techniques applied to resevoir modeling and the integration of geologicaland engineering (well test) data, Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University, Stanford, CA (1992).
C.V. Deutsch and P.W. Cockerham, Pratical consideration in the application of simulated annealing to stochastic simulation, Mathematical Geology 26 (1994) 67–82.
C.V. Deutsch and A.J. Journel, GSLIB Geostatistical Software Library and User's Guide (Oxford University Press, New York, 1992).
C.V. Deutsch and A.J. Journel, Integrating well test-derived effective absolute permeabilities in geostatistical resevoir modeling, Chapter 12, in: Stochastic Modeling and Geostatistical Principles, Methods, and Case Studies, AAPG Computer Applications Geology, No. 3, eds. J.M. Yarus and R.L. Chambers, American Association of Petroleum Geologists (1995) pp. 131–142.
C.V. Deutsch and A.J. Journel, GSLIB Geostatistical Software Library and User's Guide, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press, New York, 1998).
P.A. Dowd, A review of recent developments in geostatistics, Computers & Geosciences 17 (1992) 1481–1500.
P. Goovaerts, Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation (Oxford University Press, New York, 1997).
P. Goovaerts, R. Webster and J.-P. DuBois, Assessing the risk of soil contamination in the Swiss Jura using indicator geostatistics, Environmental and Ecological Statistics 4 (1997) 31–38.
R. Riemann Hershey, W.H. McWilliams and G.C. Reese, Utilizing the spatial structure available: creating maps of forest attributes from forest inventory data, in: Proceedings, First International Conference on Geospatial Information in Agriculture and Forestry, Vol. 1, ERIM International, Ann Arbor, MI (1998) pp. 64–71.
R. Riemann Hershey, M.A. Ramirez and D.A. Drake, Using geostatistical techniques to map the distribution of tree species from ground inventory data, in: Modelling Longitudinal and Spatially Correlated Data: Methods, Applications, and Future Directions, Lecture Notes in Statistics, Vol. 122, eds. T. Gregoire et al. (Springer, New York, 1997) pp. 188–197.
E.H. Isaaks and R.M. Srivastava, An Introduction to Applied Geostatistics (Oxford University Press, New York, 1989).
A.G. Journel and F. Alabert, Non-Gaussian data expansion in the earth science, Terra Nova 1 (1989) 123–124.
A.J. Journel and F. Alabert, New method for resevoir mapping, J. Petroleum Technology 42 (1990) 212–218.
S.L. King, Using spatial statistics to locate trees with high commercial value, in: Proceedings of the 1997 Symposium on Systems Analysis in Forest Resources, eds. J. Fried and J.M. Vasievich, US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Research Station, St Paul, MN (in press).
A.M. Liebhold, R.E. Rossi and W.P. Kemp, Geostatistics and geographic information systems in applied insect ecology, Annu. Rev. Entomol. 30 (1993) 303–327.
W.H. McWilliams, R. Riemann Hershey and S.L. Arner, Modeling spatial patterns of tree mortality in Maine, in: Proceedings of the 1997 ACSM/ASPRS Annual Convention and Exposition, Vol. 4, Resource Technology Institute, Seatle, WA (1997) pp. 410–420.
H.T. Mowrer, Propagating uncertainity through spatial estimation processes for old-growth subalpine forests using sequential Gaussian simulation in GIS, Ecological Modelling 98 (1997) 73–86.
Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania Woodlands Timber Market Report (First Quarter 1993 - First Quarter 1996), The Pennsylvania State University, School of Forest Resources, Cooperative Extension Service, University Park, PA, 1993-1996.
D.S. Powell and T.J. Considine Jr., An Analysis of Pennsylvania's Forest Resources, Resour. Bull NE-69, Broomall, PA: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station (1982).
R.E. Rossi, D.J. Mulla, A.G. Journel and E.H. Franz, Geostatistical tools for modeling and interpreting ecological spatial dependence, Ecological Monographs 62 (1992) 277–314.
R.E. Rossi, P.W. Borth and J.J. Tollefson, Stochastic simulation for characterizing ecological spatial patterns and appraising risk, Ecological Applications 3 (1993) 719–735.
R.E. Rossi, J.L. Dungan and L.R. Beck, Kriging in the shadows: geostatistical interpolation for remote sensing, Remote Sens. Environ 49 (1994) 32–40.
R.M. Srivastava and H.M. Parker, Robust measures of spatial continuity, in: Geostatistics 1, ed. M. Armstrong (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1989) pp. 295–308.
H. Wackernagel, Multivariate Geostatistics: An Introduction with Applications (Springer, Berlin, 1995).
R.H. Widmann, Forest Resources of Pennsylvania, Resour. Bull NE-131, US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Radnor, PA (1995).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
King, S.L. Sequential Gaussian simulation vs. simulated annealing for locating pockets of high-value commercial trees in Pennsylvania. Annals of Operations Research 95, 117–203 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018970612016
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018970612016