Skip to main content
Log in

Multiple criteria linear programming model for portfolio selection

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The portfolio selection problem is usually considered as a bicriteria optimization problem where a reasonable trade-off between expected rate of return and risk is sought. In the classical Markowitz model the risk is measured with variance, thus generating a quadratic programming model. The Markowitz model is frequently criticized as not consistent with axiomatic models of preferences for choice under risk. Models consistent with the preference axioms are based on the relation of stochastic dominance or on expected utility theory. The former is quite easy to implement for pairwise comparisons of given portfolios whereas it does not offer any computational tool to analyze the portfolio selection problem. The latter, when used for the portfolio selection problem, is restrictive in modeling preferences of investors. In this paper, a multiple criteria linear programming model of the portfolio selection problem is developed. The model is based on the preference axioms for choice under risk. Nevertheless, it allows one to employ the standard multiple criteria procedures to analyze the portfolio selection problem. It is shown that the classical mean-risk approaches resulting in linear programming models correspond to specific solution techniques applied to our multiple criteria model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D.E. Bell and H. Raiffa, Risky choice revisited, in: Decision Making: Descriptive, Normative and 162 W. Ogryczak / Linear programming model for portfolio selection Prescriptive Interactions, eds. D.E. Bell et al. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988) pp. 99–112.

    Google Scholar 

  2. V. Chankong and Y.Y. Haimes, Multiobjective Decision Making(North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  3. P.C. Fishburn, The Foundations of Expected Utility(Reidel, Dordrecht, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  4. J.L. Gastwirth, A general definition of the Lorenz curve, Econometrica 39 (1971) 1037–1039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. M.G. Kendall and A. Stuart, The Advanced Theory of Statistics,Vol. 1: Distribution Theory (Griffin, London, 1958).

    Google Scholar 

  6. R.S. Klein, H. Luss and D.R. Smith, A lexicographic minimax algorithm for multiperiod resource allocation, Math. Programming 55 (1992) 213–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. H. Konno and H. Yamazaki, Mean-absolute deviation portfolio optimization model and its application to Tokyo stock market, Manag. Sci. 37 (1991) 519–531.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M.M. Kostreva and W. Ogryczak, Linear optimization with multiple equitable criteria, RAIRO Rech. Op´er. 33 (1999) 275–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. H. Levy, Stochastic dominance and expected utility: survey and analysis, Manag. Sci. 38 (1992) 555–593.

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. Lewandowski and A.P. Wierzbicki, eds., Aspiration Based Decision Support Systems-Theory, Software and Applications (Springer, Berlin, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  11. E. Marchi and J.A. Oviedo, Lexicographic optimality in the multiple objective linear programming: the nucleolar solution, Eur. J. Opl. Res. 57 (1992) 355–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. H. Markowitz, Portfolio selection, J. Fin. 7 (1952) 77–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. A.W. Marshall and I. Olkin, Inequalities: Theory of Majorization and Its Applications(Academic Press, New York, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  14. W. Ogryczak, Equitable multiple criteria programming, Technical Report TR 96–02 (223), Institute of Informatics, Warsaw University, Warsaw (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  15. W. Ogryczak and S. Lahoda, Aspiration/reservation decision support-a step beyond goal programming, J. Multi-Criteria Dec. Anal. 1 (1992) 101–117.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J.A.M. Potters and S.H. Tijs, The nucleolus of a matrix game and other nucleoli, Math. Oper. Res. 17 (1992) 164–174.

    Google Scholar 

  17. U. Segal, Order indifference and rank-dependent probabilities, J. Math. Economics 22 (1993) 373–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. W.F. Sharpe, A linear programming approximation for the general portfolio analysis problem, J. Fin. Quant. Anal. 6 (1971) 1263–1275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. M.G. Speranza, Linear programming models for portfolio optimization, Finance 14 (1993) 107–123.

    Google Scholar 

  20. R.E. Steuer, Multiple Criteria Optimization-Theory, Computation & Applications(Wiley, New York, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ph. Vincke, Multicriteria Decision-Aid(Wiley, New York, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  22. G.A. Whitmore and M.C. Findlay, eds., Stochastic Dominance: An Approach to Decision-Making Under Risk (D.C. Heath, Lexington, MA, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  23. A.P. Wierzbicki, A mathematical basis for satisficing decision making, Math. Modelling 3 (1982) 391–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. M.E. Yaari, The dual theory of choice under risk, Econometrica 55 (1987) 95–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. R.R. Yager, On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision making, IEEE Trans. Sys. Man Cyber. 18 (1988) 183–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. R.R. Yager and D.P. Filev, Essentials of Fuzzy Modeling and Control(Wiley, New York, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  27. S. Yitzhaki, Stochastic dominance, mean variance, and Gini's mean difference, Amer. Econ. Rev. 72 (1982) 178–185.

    Google Scholar 

  28. M.R. Young, A minimax portfolio selection rule with linear programming solution, Manag. Sci. 44 (1998) 673–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ogryczak, W. Multiple criteria linear programming model for portfolio selection. Annals of Operations Research 97, 143–162 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018980308807

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018980308807

Navigation