Skip to main content
Log in

A review and interpretations of process capability indices

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Practitioners of industrial statistics are generally familiar with the common C p and C pk process capability indices. However, many additional indices have been proposed, and knowledge of these is less widespread. More importantly, information regarding the indices' comparative behavior is lacking. This paper compares the behavior of various indices under shifting process conditions. Both useful and misleading characteristics of the indices are identified. We begin with a short history of process capability measures. Several process capability indices are reviewed. Application areas for capability indices are also summarized. The indices are grouped according to the loss functions which are used in their interpretation. Characteristics of the various indices are discussed. Finally, recommendations are made for selection of indices at differing levels of process performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L.K. Chan, S.W. Cheng and F.A. Spiring, The robustness of process capability index C p to departures from normality, in: Statistical Theory and Data Analysis, II, ed. K. Matusita, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1988, pp. 223-229.

    Google Scholar 

  2. L.K. Chan, S.W. Cheng and F.A. Spiring, A new measure of process capability: C pm, Journal of Modeling and Simulation 11(1988)1-6.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J.A. Clements, Process capability calculations for non-normal distributions, Quality Progress 22(9)(1989)95-100.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A.V. Feigenbaum, Quality Control, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1951, pp. 383-389.

    Google Scholar 

  5. F.M. Gryna, Quality Control Handbook, ed. J.M. Juran, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1988, pp. 16.14-16.35, 4th ed.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J.T. Herman, Capability index — enough for process industries?, ASQC Annual Quality Congress Transactions, Toronto, 1989, pp. 670-675.

  7. T.C. Hsiang and G. Taguchi, A tutorial on quality control and assurance — the Taguchi methods, unpublished presentation given at the Annual Meetings of the American Statistical Association, Las Vegas, NV, 1985.

  8. W.G. Hunter and C.P. Kartha, Determining the most profitable target value for a production process, Journal of Quality Technology 9(1977)176-181.

    Google Scholar 

  9. N.L. Johnson, S. Kotz and W.L. Pearn, Flexible process capability indices, Institute of Statistics Mimeo Series, No. 2072, Department of Statistics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J.M. Juran, Quality Control Handbook, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1951, pp. 253-279 and 404-409.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J.M. Juran, Quality Control Handbook, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1962, pp. 11-14-11-27

    Google Scholar 

  12. J.M. Juran and P.M. Gryna, Quality Planning and Analysis, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980, pp. 283-295.

    Google Scholar 

  13. V.E. Kane, Process capability indices, Journal of Quality Technology 18(1986)41-52.

    Google Scholar 

  14. S. Kotz and N.J. Johnson, Process Capability Indices, Chapman and Hall, London, 1993, pp. 121-127.

    Google Scholar 

  15. L.S. Nelson, Best target value for a production process, Journal of Quality Technology 10(1978)88-89.

    Google Scholar 

  16. W.L. Pearn, S. Kotz and N.L. Johnson, Distributional and inferential properties of process control indices, Journal of Quality Technology 24(1992)216-231.

    Google Scholar 

  17. R.N. Rodriguez, Recent developments in process capability analysis, Journal of Quality Technology 24(1992)176-187.

    Google Scholar 

  18. W.A. Shewhart, Economic Control of Quality of Manufactured Products, D. Van Nostrand, New York, 1931, pp. 249-272.

    Google Scholar 

  19. C.H. Springer, A method for determining the most economical position of a process mean, Industrial Quality Control 8(1951)36-39.

    Google Scholar 

  20. L.P. Sullivan, Reducing variability: A new approach to quality, Quality Progress 17(7)(1984)15-21.

    Google Scholar 

  21. L.P. Sullivan, Letters, Quality Progress 18(4)(1985)7-8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Palmer, K., Tsui, KL. A review and interpretations of process capability indices. Annals of Operations Research 87, 31–47 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018993221702

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018993221702

Keywords

Navigation