Skip to main content
Log in

A Quantum Treatment of Public Goods Economics

  • Published:
Quantum Information Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Quantum generalizations of conventional games broaden the range of available strategies, which can help improve outcomes for the participants. With many players, such quantum games can involve entanglement among many states which is difficult to implement, especially if the states must be communicated over some distance. This paper describes a quantum approach to the economically significant n-player public goods game that requires only two-particle entanglement and is thus much easier to implement than more general quantum mechanisms. In spite of the large temptation to free ride on the efforts of others in the original game, two-particle entanglement is sufficient to give near optimal expected payoff when players use a simple mixed strategy for which no player can benefit by making different choices. This mechanism can also address some heterogeneous preferences among the players.

PACS: 03.67-a; 02.50Le; 89.65.Gh

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. P. W. Shor, in S. Goldwasser (ed.), Proc. of the 35th Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 124-134, Los Alamitos, CA, November (IEEE Press, 1994).

  2. D. A. Meyer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1052–1055 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Eisert, M. Wilkens, and M. Lewenstein, Phy. Rev. Lett. 83, 3077–3080 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Eisert and M. Wilkens, J. Modern Optics 47, 2543–2556 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jiangfeng Du et al., Phys. Lett. A 302, 229–233 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jiangfeng Du et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 137902 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. C. Benjamin and P. M. Hayden, Phys. Rev. A 64, 030301 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  8. G. Hardin, Science 162, 1243 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  9. P. G. Kwiat et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4725–4728 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  10. J.-W. Pan, C. Simon, Č. Brukner, and A. Zeilinger, Nature 410, 1067–1070 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. Bouwmeester, J.-W. Pan, M. Daniell, H. Weinfurter, and A. Zeilinger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1345–1349 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  12. J.-W. Pan, M. Daniell, S. Gasparoni, G. Weihs, and A. Zeilinger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4435–4438 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  13. E. Knill, R. Laflamme, and G. J. Milburn, Nature 409, 46–52 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Z. Yuan et al., Electrically driven single-photon source. Science 295, 102–105 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  15. S. Tanzilli et al., Electron. Lett. 37, 27–28 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  16. E. J. Mason et al., Los Alamos preprint quant-ph/0207156 (2002).

  17. O. Benson, C. Santori, M. Pelton, and Y. Yamamoto, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2513–2516 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  18. T. Groves and J. O. Ledyard, Econometrica 45, 783–809 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. Ledyard, in Handbook of Experimental Economics, John Kagel and Alvin Roth (eds) Chapter 2, (Princeton University Press, 1995), pp. 111-181.

  20. E. Rasmusen, Games and Information: An Introduction to Game Theory (Basil Blackwell, 1989).

  21. R. Aumann and S. Hart (eds.), Handbook of Game Theory with Economics Applications, Volume 1, (Elsevier, 1992).

  22. D. Kreps, A Course in Microeconomic Theory (Princeton University Press, 1990).

  23. S. J. van Enk and R. Pike, Phys. Rev. A 66, 024306 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kay-Yut Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, KY., Hogg, T. & Beausoleil, R. A Quantum Treatment of Public Goods Economics. Quantum Information Processing 1, 449–469 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024070415465

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024070415465

Navigation