Skip to main content
Log in

Textual Variation and Version Control in the TEI

  • Published:
Computers and the Humanities Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Projects that attempt to encode variorum texts with the Text Encoding Initiative's Guidelines for Electronic Text Encoding and Interchange will likely encounter situations where the text varies in its structure, as well as in its content. Although encoding textual variants at a separate level using a version control system may be attractive, the advantages in encoding text and variants in the same format are considerable. This paper proposes solutions to three problems that require more than the standard TEI textual critical elements: transposition, variation of meta-data, and insertion of incomplete structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barnard, D. T., L. Burnard, J.-P. Gaspart, L. A. Price, C. Sperberg-McQueen and G. B. Varile. “Hierarchical Encoding of Text: Technical Problems and SGML Solutions”. Computers and the Humanities, 29 (1995a), 211–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, D. T., G. Clarke and N. Duncan. Tree-to-tree Correction for Document Trees. Technical Report 95–372, Department of Computing and Information Science, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, 1995b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cederqvist, P. Version Management with CVS. Signum Support AB, CVS version 1.10 edition. http://www.loria.fr/~molli/cvs/doc/cvs_toc.html, 1998.

  • Chawathe, S. and H. Garcia-Molina. “Meaningful Change Detection in Structured Data”. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. Arizona: Tucson, 1997, pp. 26–37.

  • Chawathe, S. S., S. Abiteboul, and J. Widom. “Representing and Querying Changes in Semistructured Data”. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Data Engineering. Los Alamitos, 1998, pp. 1–23.

  • Cover, R. C. and P. M. Robinson. “Encoding Textual Criticism”. Computers and the Humanities, 29, (1995), 123–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuwirth, C. M., R. Chandhok, D. S. Kaufer, P. Erion, J. Morris and D. Miller. “Flexible Diff-ing in a Collaborative Writing System”. In Proceedings of the Fourth Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. Toronto, Canada, 1992, pp. 147–154.

  • Renear, A., E. Mylonas and D. Durand. Research in Humanities Computing 4. Chapt. Refining Our Notion of What Text Really Is: The Problem of Overlapping Hierarchies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994, pp. 263–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, P. The Transcription of Primary Textual Sources Using SGML. No. 6 in Office for Humanities Communication Publications. Oxford: Office for Humanities Communication, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperberg-McQueen, C. and L. Burnard. Guidelines for Electronic Text Encoding and Interchange. Chicago and Oxford: The Text Encoding Initiative, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tichy, W. F. RCS — A System for Version Control. Technical report, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, D. Textual Variation and Version Control in the TEI. Computers and the Humanities 33, 103–112 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1001795210724

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1001795210724

Navigation