Skip to main content
Log in

No Longer a Shot in the Dark: Engineering a Robust Environment for Film Study

  • Published:
Computers and the Humanities Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Representation of film texts for scholars and students has been fraught with difficulties imposed by the very nature of the text. The time-varying image track presented hurdles to close significant challenges to formulation of units of meaning and analysis. The digital environment offers opportunities for addressing these problems. We offer here a model of the film document as a bundle of time-varying signals. We demonstrate using this model to construct a system for close analysis of film texts, including precise measurement of attributes. Finally, we consider some consequence for the pedagogical environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arrowsmith, W. “Film as Educator”. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 3(3) (1969), 75–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bersani, L. and U. Dutoit. Caravaggio's Secrets. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • (Nota Bene: Publishers page for Caravaggio's Secrets and an excerpt from Danto's review are at: http://mitpress.mit.edu/book-home.tcl?isbn=0262024497

  • Bonitzer, P. “Here: The Notion of the Shot and the Subject of Cinema”. Cahiers du Cinema, 27, January, 1977.

  • Danto, Arthur C. LinguaFranca, Fall 1998.

  • Excalibur Technologies Corporation. Abstract for Video Analysis Engine. White Paper available at: http://www.xrs.com/forms/videowp.html

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Augst, B., O'Connor, B.C. No Longer a Shot in the Dark: Engineering a Robust Environment for Film Study. Computers and the Humanities 33, 345–363 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002459729916

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002459729916

Navigation