Skip to main content
Log in

Can Constructive Mathematics be Applied in Physics?

  • Published:
Journal of Philosophical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The nature of modern constructive mathematics, and its applications, actual and potential, to classical and quantum physics, are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Beeson, Michael J.: 1985, Foundations of Constructive Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bishop, Errett: 1967, Foundations of Constructive Analysis, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bishop, Errett and Bridges, Douglas: 1985, Constructive Analysis, Grundlehren der math. Wissenschaften, Vol. 279, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bridges, Douglas: 1981, A constructive look at positive linear functionals on L.(H), Pacific J. Math. 95(1): 11–25.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bridges, Douglas: 1995, Constructive mathematics and unbounded operators - a reply to Hellman, J. Phil. Logic 25: 549–561.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bridges, Douglas and Dediu, Luminiţa: Constructing Extensions of Ultraweakly Continuous Linear Functionals. Preprint, University of Waikato.

  7. Bridges, Douglas and Dudley Ward, Nicholas: 1998, Constructing ultraweakly continuous linear functionals on B(H), Proc. American Math. Soc. 126(11): 3347–3353.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bridges, Douglas and Ishihara, Hajime: Constructive Unbounded Operators. Preprint, University of Waikato.

  9. Bridges, Douglas and Richman, Fred: 1987, Varieties of Constructive Mathematics, London Math. Soc. Lecture Notes 97, Cambridge University Press.

  10. Bridges, Douglas, Richman, Fred and Schuster, Peter: Trace - Class Operators. Preprint, University of Waikato.

  11. Brouwer, L. E. J.: 1981, Over de Grondslagen der Wiskunde, Doctoral Thesis, University of Amsterdam, 1907. Reprinted with additional material (D. van Dalen, ed.) by Mathematisch Centrum, Amsterdam.

  12. Cooke, Roger, Keane, Michael and Moran, William: 1985, An elementary proof of Gleason's Theorem, Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 98: 117–125.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dummett, M. A. E.: 1977, Elements of Intuitionism, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ye, Feng: 1998, On Errett Bishop's Constructivism - Some Expositions, Extensions, and Critiques, Ph.D. thesis, Princeton University.

  15. Gleason, A. M.: 1957, Measures on the closed subspaces of a Hilbert space, J. Math. Mechanics 6: 885–893.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hellman, Geoffrey: 1993, Gleason's Theorem is not constructively provable, J. Phil. Logic 22: 193–203.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hellman, Geoffrey: 1993, Constructive mathematics and quantum mechanics: unbounded operators and the spectral theorem, J. Phil. Logic 22: 221–248.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hellman, Geoffrey: 1997, Quantum mechanical unbounded operators and constructive mathematics - a rejoinder to Bridges, J. Phil. Logic 26: 121–127.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kushner, B. A.: 1985, Lectures on Constructive Mathematical Analysis, Amer.Math. Soc., Providence RI.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Markov, A. A.: 1954, Theory of Algorithms (Russian), Trudy Mat. Instituta imeni V. A. Steklova, Vol. 42, Izdatel'stvo Akademii Nauk SSSR, Moskva.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Martin-Löf, Per: 1975, An Intuitionistic Theory of Types: Predicative Part, in Logic Colloquium 1973, H. E. Rose and J. C. Shepherdson (eds.), pp. 73–118, North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mines, Ray, Richman, Fred and Ruitenburg, Wim: 1988, A Course in Constructive Algebra, Universitext, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pour-El, M. B. and Richards, I.: 1990, Computability in Analysis and Physics, Perspectives in Mathematical Logic, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Richman, Fred: 1990, Intuitionism as a generalization, Philosophia Math. 5: 124-128.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Richman, Fred and Bridges, Douglas: A Constructive Proof of Gleason's Theorem, Preprint.

  26. Troelstra, A. S.: 1992, Comparing the theory of representations and constructive mathematics, in Computer Science Logic: Proceedings of the 5th Workshop, CSL'91, Berne Switzerland, E. Börger, G. Jäger, H. Kleine Büning, and M. M. Richter (eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 626, pp. 382–395, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Troelstra, A. S. and van Dalen, D.: 1988, Constructivism in Mathematics: An Introduction (two volumes), North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Weihrauch, Klaus: 1987, Computability, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Weihrauch, Klaus: 1996, A foundation for computable analysis, in Combinatorics, Complexity, & Logic (Proceedings of Conference in Auckland, 9-13 December 1996), D. S. Bridges, C. S. Calude, J. Gibbons, S. Reeves, and I. H. Witten (eds.), Springer-Verlag, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bridges, D.S. Can Constructive Mathematics be Applied in Physics?. Journal of Philosophical Logic 28, 439–453 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004420413391

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004420413391

Navigation