Abstract
My object is to question a recurrent claim made to the point that Thomas Reid (1710–1796) was hostile to ether theories and that this hostility had its source in his distinctive interpretation of the first of Newton's regulæ philosophandi. Against this view I will argue that Reid did not have any quarrel at all with unobservable or theoretical entities as such, and that his objections against actual theories concerning ether were scientific rather than philosophical, even when based on Newton's first rule. I argue further that Reid's insistence on Newton's rule concerns, not direct observation, but rather the notion of explanation itself.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Buchdahl, G.: 1969, Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Science, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Cantor, G. N.: 1971, ‘Henry Brougham and the ScottishMethodological Tradition’, Studies in the History of Philosophy of Science 2(1).
Laudan, L.: 1981, ‘The Epistemology of Light’, in Science and Hypothesis – Historical Essays on Scientific Methodology, Reidel, Dordrecht and Boston.
Newton, I.: 1995, in I. B. Cohen and R. S. Westfall (eds.), Principa, quoted from Texts, Backgrounds, Commentaries, W. W. Norton, New York, London.
Reid, T.: 1872, Essays on the Intellectual Powers of the Human Mind, ed. Sir William Hamilton, 7th edition, Edinburgh, 1872.
Reid, T.: 1995, ‘Some Observations on the Modern System of Materialism’, in Paul Wood (ed.), Thomas Reid on the Animate Creation – Papers Relating to the Life Sciences, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
Urbach, P.: 1987, Francis Bacon's Philosophy of Science: An Account and a Reappraisal, La Salle, III, Open Court.
Wood, P.: 1976, 'Reid on Hypotheses and the Ether; a Reassessment, in Stephen T. Barker and Tom L. Beauchamp (eds.), Thomas Reid: Critical Interpretations, Philadelphia, PA: Philosophical monographs 3, 433–446.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
CALLERGÅRD, R. The Hypothesis Of Ether And Reid's Interpretation Of Newton's First Rule Of Philosophizing. Synthese 120, 19–26 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005250302365
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005250302365