Skip to main content
Log in

On Growth, Ageing, and Fractal Differentiation of Science

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

On the basis of the measured time-dependent distribution of references in recent scientific publications, we formulate a novel model on the ageing of recent scientific literature. The framework of this model is given by a basic set of mathematical expressions that allows us to understand and describe large-scale growth and ageing processes in science over a long period of time. In addition, a further and striking consequence results in a self- consistent way from our model. After the Scientific Revolution in 16th century Europe, the 'Scientific Evolution' begins, and the driving processes growth and ageing unavoidably lead - just as in our biological evolution - to a fractal differentiation of science. A fractal structure means a system build up with sub-systems characterised by a power-law size distribution. Such a distribution implies that there is no preference of size or scale. Often this phenomenon is regarded as a fingerprint of self-organisation. These findings are in agreement with earlier empirical findings concerning the clustering of scientific literature. Our observations reinforce the idea of science as a complex, largely self-organising 'cognitive eco-system'. They also refute Kuhn's paradigm model of scientific development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Price, D. J. De Solla, Little Science, Big Science, New York: Columbia University Press, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Price, D. J. De Solla, Networks of scientific papers, Science, 149 (1965) 510-515.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Price, D. J. De Solla, Little Science, Big Science,....and Beyond. New York: Columbia University Press. 1986. (Revised and enlarged edition of Ref. 1 including also Ref. 2).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Griffith, B. C., Derek Price's puzzles: Numerical metaphors for the operation of science, Society of the Social Studies of Science (4S) Price Memorial Lecture, 1987.

  5. MacRae Jr., D., Growth and decay curves in scientific citations, American Sociological Review, 34 (1969) 631-635.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Griffith, B. C., P. N. Servi, A. L. Anker, M. C. Drott, The aging of scientific literature: a citation analysis, Journal of Documentation, 35 (1979) 179-196.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Van Raan, A. F. J., Further observations on growth and ageing of science, to be published.

  8. Moed, H. F., R. E. De Bruin, Th. N. Van Leeuwen, New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: database description, overview of indicators and first applications, Scientometrics, 33 (1995) 381-422.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Van Raan, A. F. J., Advanced bibliometric methods as quantitative core of peer review based evaluation and foresight exercises, Scientometrics, 36 (1996) 397-420.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Laird, A. K., Dynamics of Tumor Growth, Brit. J. Cancer 18 (1964) 490-502.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gompertz, B., On the nature of the function expressive of the law of human mortality, and on a new mode of determining the value of life contingencies, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., 115 (1825) 513-585.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Egghe, L., I. K. Ravichandra Rao, Classification of growth models based on growth rates and its applications, Scientometrics, 25 (1992) 5-46.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rousseau, R., Double exponential models for first-citation processes, Scientometrics, 30 (1994) 213-227.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Egghe, L., On the influence of growth on obsolescence, Scientometrics, 27 (1993) 195-214.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Egghe, L., I. K. Ravichandra Rao, R. Rousseau, On the influence of production on utilization functions: obsolescence or increased use? Scientometrics, 34 (1995) 285-315.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pielou, E. C., An Introduction To Mathematical Ecology. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fermi, E., On the origin of the cosmic radiation, Physical Review 75 (1949) 1169-1174.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Naranan, S., Bradford's law of bibliography of science: an interpretation, Nature, 227 (1970) 631-632.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Naranan, S., Power law relations in science bibliography: a self-consistent interpretation, Journal of Documentation, 27 (1971) 83-97.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Van Raan, A. F. J., Fractal dimension of co-citations, Nature, 347 (1990) 626.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lee, Y., L. A. N. Amaral, D. Canning, M. Meyer, H. E. Stanley, Universal features in the growth dynamics of complex organisations, Phys. Rev. Lett., 81 (1998) 3275-3278.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Amaral, L. A. N., S. V. Buldyrev, S. Havlin, M. A. Salinger, H. E. Stanley, Power law scaling for a system of interacting units with complex internal structure, Phys. Rev. Lett., 80 (1998) 1385-1388.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Plerou, V., L. A. N. Amaral, P. Gopikrishnan, M. Meyer, H. E. Stanley, Similarities between the growth dynamics of university research and of competitive economic activities, Nature, 400 (1999) 433-437.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kauffman, S. A., The Origin of Order. Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bak, P., C. Tang, K. Wiesenfeld, Self-organized criticality, Physical Review, A, 38 (1988) 364-374.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bak, P., K. Chen, Self-organized criticality, Scientific American, January 1991, 26-33.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Raan, A.F.J. On Growth, Ageing, and Fractal Differentiation of Science. Scientometrics 47, 347–362 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005647328460

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005647328460

Keywords

Navigation