Skip to main content
Log in

Operational Concepts of Nonmonotonic Logics Part 2: Autoepistemic Logic

  • Published:
Artificial Intelligence Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The subject of nonmonotonic reasoning is reasoning with incompleteinformation. One of the main approaches is autoepistemic logic inwhich reasoning is based on introspection. This paper aims at providing a smooth introduction to this logic,stressing its motivation and basic concepts. The meaning (semantics)of autoepistemic logic is given in terms of so-called expansionswhich are usually defined as solutions of a fixed-point equation. Thepresent paper shows a more understandable, operational method fordetermining expansions. By improving applicability of the basicconcepts to concrete examples, we hope to make a contribution to awider usage of autoepistemic logic in practical applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antoniou, G. & Sperschneider, V. (1993).Computing Extensions of Nonmonotonic Logics. In Proc. 4th Scandinavian Conference on Artificial Intelligence. IOS Press.

  • Antoniou, G. & Sperschneider, V. (1994). Operational Concepts of Nonmonotonic Logics–Part 1: Default Logic. Artificial Intelligence Review 8: 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appelt D. E. & Konolige, K. (1988). A Nonmonotonic Logic for Reasoning about Speech Acts and Belief Revision. In Reinfrank et. al. (eds.), Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Proc. 2nd International Workshop. Springer LNAI 346.

  • Brewka, G. (1991). Nonmonotonic Reasoning: Logical Foundations of Commonsense. Cambridge University Press.

  • Gelfond, M. (1987). On Stratified Autoepistemic Theories. In Proc. American National Conference on Artificial Intelligence.

  • Gelfond, M. & Przymusinska, H. (1989). Formalization of Inheritance Reasoning in Auto-epistemic Logic. Fundamenta Informaticae 13(4): 403–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelfond, M. & Przymusinska, H. (1992).On Consistency and Completeness of Autoepistemic Theories. Fundamenta Informaticae 16: 59–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konolige, K. (1988a). On the Relation Between Default and Autoepistemic Logic. Artificial Intelligence35: 343–382; see also Errata, Artificial Intelligence 41: 115, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konolige, K. (1988b). Hierarchic Autoepistemic Theories for Nonmonotonic Reasoning: Preliminary Report. In Reinfrank et al. (eds.), Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Proc. 2nd International Workshop. Springer LNAI 346.

  • Konolige, K. (1991). Quantifying in Autoepistemic Logic. Fundamenta Informaticae 15(3–4).

  • Marek, W. (1989). Stable Theories in Autoepistemic Logic. Fundamenta Informaticae 12: 243–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marek, W. & Truszczynski M. (1989). Relating Autoepistemic Logic and Default Logic. Proc. 1st International Conference on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning.

  • Marek, W. & Truszczynski, M. (1993). Nonmonotonic Logic–Context-Dependent Reasoning. Springer.

  • McDermott, D. & Doyle, J. (1980). Nonmonotonic Logic I. Artificial Intelligence 13: 41–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, D. & Doyle, J. (1982). Nonmonotonic Logic II: Nonmonotonic Modal Theories. Journal of the ACM 29(1): 33–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore R. C. (1984). Possible-World Semantics for Autoepistemic Logic. In Proc. NonMonotonic Reasoning Workshop. New Paltz.

  • Moore, R. C. (1985). Semantical Considerations on Nonmonotonic Logic. Artificial Intelligence 25: 75–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiter, R. (1980). A Logic for Default Reasoning. Artificial Intelligence 13: 81–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperschneider, V. & Antoniou, G. (1991). Logic: A Foundation for Computer Science. Addison-Wesley.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Antoniou, G., Sperschneider, V. Operational Concepts of Nonmonotonic Logics Part 2: Autoepistemic Logic. Artificial Intelligence Review 12, 431–443 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006516126932

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006516126932

Navigation