Skip to main content
Log in

Multiple automatic base selection: Protein–ligand docking based on incremental construction without manual intervention

  • Published:
Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A possible way of tackling the molecular docking problem arising in computer- aided drug design is the use of the incremental construction method. This method consists of three steps: the selection of a part of a molecule, a so- called base fragment, the placement of the base fragment into the active site of a protein, and the subsequent reconstruction of the complete drug molecule. Assuming that a part of a drug molecule is known, which is specific enough to be a good base fragment, the method is proven to be successful for a large set of docking examples. In addition, it leads to the fastest algorithms for flexible docking published so far. In most real-world applications of docking, large sets of ligands have to be tested for affinity to a given protein. Thus, manual selection of a base fragment is not practical. On the other hand, the selection of a base fragment is critical in that only few selections lead to a low-energy structure. We overcome this limitation by selecting a representative set of base fragments instead of a single one. In this paper, we present a set of rules and algorithms to automate this selection. In addition, we extend the incremental construction method to deal with multiple fragmentations of the drug molecule. Our results show that with multiple automated base selection, the quality of the docking predictions is almost as good as with one manually preselected base fragment. In addition, the set of solutions is more diverse and alternative binding modes with low scores are found. Although the run time of the overall algorithm increases, the method remains fast enough to search through large ligand data sets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kuntz, I.D., Blaney, J.M., Oatley, S.J., Langridge, R.L. and Ferrin, T.E., J. Mol. Biol., 161 (1982) 269.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Blaney, J.M. and Dixon, J.S., Perspect. Drug Discov. Design, 1 (1993) 301.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Colman, P.M., Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 4 (1994) 868.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kuntz, I.D., Science, 257 (1992) 1078.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lengauer, T. and Rarey, M., Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 6 (1996) 402.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lybrand, T.P., Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 5 (1995) 224.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jones, G., Willet, P. and Glen, R.C., J. Mol. Biol., 245 (1995) 43.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Oshiro, C.M., Kuntz, I.D. and Dixon, J.S., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 9 (1995) 113.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Clark, K.P. and Ajay, J. Comput. Chem., 16 (1995) 1210.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gehlhaar, D.K., Verkhivker, G.M., Rejto, P.A., Sherman, C.J., Fogel, D.B., Fogel, L.J. and Freer, S.T., Chem. Biol., 2 (1995) 317.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Leach, A.R. and Kuntz, I.D., J. Comput. Chem., 13 (1992) 730.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rarey, M., Kramer, B. and Lengauer, T., In Rawlings, C. et al. (Eds.) Proceedings of the ThirdInternational Conference on Intelligent Systems in Molecular Biology, AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA, U.S.A., 1995, pp. 300–308.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rarey, M., Kramer, B., Lengauer, T. and Klebe, G., J. Mol. Biol., 261 (1996) 470.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Welch, W., Ruppert, J. and Jain, A.N., Chem. Biol., 3 (1996) 449.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rarey, M., Wefing, S. and Lengauer, T., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 10 (1996) 41.

    Google Scholar 

  16. De Clercq, P.J., Tetrahedron, 40 (1984) 3717.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Klebe, G. and Mietzner, T., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 8 (1994) 583.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Böhm, H.-J., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 6 (1992) 593.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Böhm, H.-J., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 8 (1994) 243.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Linnainmaa, S., Harwood, D. and Davis, L.S., IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell., 10 (1988) 634.

    Google Scholar 

  21. SYBYL, Tripos Associates Inc., St. Louis, MO, U.S.A., 1994.

  22. Morris, G.M., Goodsell, D.S., Huey, R. and Olson, A.J., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 10 (1996) 293.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rarey, M., Kramer, B. & Lengauer, T. Multiple automatic base selection: Protein–ligand docking based on incremental construction without manual intervention. J Comput Aided Mol Des 11, 369–384 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007913026166

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007913026166

Navigation