Skip to main content
Log in

A Reduced Space Branch and Bound Algorithm for Global optimization

  • Published:
Journal of Global Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A general class of branch and bound algorithms forsolving a wide class of nonlinear programs with branching only in asubset of the problem variables is presented. By reducing the dimension of thesearch space, this technique may dramatically reduce the number ofiterations and time required for convergence to ∈ tolerancewhile retaining proven exact convergence in the infinite limit. Thispresentation includes specifications of the class of nonlinearprograms, a statement of a class of branch and bound algorithms, aconvergence proof, and motivating examples with results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. F. A. Al-Khayyal and J. E. Falk. Jointly constrained biconvex programming. Mathematics of Operations Research, 8(2):273–286, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  2. I. P. Androulakis, C. D. Maranas, and C. A. Floudas. α_BB: A global optimization method for general constrainted nonconvex problems. Journal of Global Optimization, 7(4):337–363, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  3. T. G. W. Epperly and R. E. Swaney. Branch and bound for global NLP: New bounding LP. In Ignacio E. Grossmann (ed.), Global Optimization in Engineering Design, chapter 1. Kluwer, 1996.

  4. J. E. Falk and R. M. Soland. An algorithm for separable nonconvex programming problems. Management Science, 15(9):550–569, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. Horst. An algorithm for nonconvex programming. Mathematical Programming, 10:312–21, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. Horst. Deterministic global optimization with partition sets whose feasibility is not known: Application to concave minimization, reverse convex constraints, DC-programming, and Lipschitzian optimization. Journal of Optimization Theory and Application, 58(1):11–37, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. Horst and N. V. Thoai. Conical algorithm for the global minimization of linearly constrained decomposable concave minimization problems. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 74(3):469–486, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Horst and N. V. Thoai. Constraint decomposition algorithms in global optimization. Journal of Global Optimization, 5:333–348, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. G. Ierapetritou and E. N. Pistikopoulos. Batch plant design and operations under uncertainty. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 35(2):772–787, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. P. McCormick. Computability of global solutions to factorable nonconvex programs: Part I — Convex underestimating problems. Mathematical Programming, 10:147–175, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. P. McCormick. Nonlinear Programming, Theory, Algorithms, and Applications. John Wiley & Sons, 1983.

  12. B. A. Murtagh and M. A. Saunders. MINOS 5.1 user’s guide. Technical Report SOL 83-20R, Systems Optimization Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305–4022, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  13. L. D. Muu. An algorithm for solving convex programs with an additional convex-concave constraint. Mathematical Programming, 61:75–87, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  14. L. D. Muu and W. Oettli. Combined branch-and-bound and cutting plane methods for solving a class of nonlinear programming problems. Journal of Global Optimization, 3:377–391, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. Neumaier. Interval Methods for Systems of Equations. Encyclopedia of Mathematics and Its Applications. Cambridge University Press, 1990.

  16. A. T. Phillips and J. B. Rosen. A parallel algorithm for constrained concave quadratic global minimization. Mathematical Programming, 42:421–448, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  17. T. Q. Phong, L. T. H. An, and P. D. Tao. Decomposition branch and bound method for globally solving linearly constrained indefinite quadratic minimization problems. Operations Research Letters, 17:215–220, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  18. I. Quesada and I. E. Grossmann. Aglobal optimization algorithmfor linear fractional and bilinear programs. Journal of Global Optimization, 6:39–76, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  19. H. S. Ryoo and N. V. Sahinidis. Global optimization of nonconvex NLPs and MINLPs with applications in process design. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 19(5):551–566, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  20. H. D. Sherali and A. Alameddine. A new reformulation-linearization technique for bilinear programming problems. Journal of Global Optimization, 2:379–410, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  21. H. D. Sherali and C. H. Tuncbilek. A global optimization algorithm for polynomial programming problems using a reformulation-linearization technique. Journal of Global Optimization, 2:101–112, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  22. H. D. Sherali and C. H. Tuncbilek. A reformulation-convexification approach for solving nonconvex quadratic programming problems. Journal of Global Optimization, 7:1–31, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  23. E. M. B. Smith and C. C. Pantelides. Global optimization of general process models. In Ignacio E. Grossmann, editor, Global Optimization in Engineering Design, chapter 12. Kluwer, 1996.

  24. H. Tuy. Effect of the subdivision strategy on convergence and efficiency of some global optimization algorithms. Journal of Global Optimization, 1(1):23–36, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Epperly, T.G.W., Pistikopoulos, E.N. A Reduced Space Branch and Bound Algorithm for Global optimization. Journal of Global Optimization 11, 287–311 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008212418949

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008212418949

Navigation