Skip to main content
Log in

On Projective Invariant Smoothing and Evolutions of Planar Curves and Polygons

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several recently introduced and studied planar curve evolutionequations turn out to be iterative smoothing procedures that areinvariant under the actions of the Euclidean and affine groups ofcontinuous transformations. This paper discusses possible ways toextend these results to the projective group of transformations.Invariant polygon evolutions are also investigated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L. Alvarez, F. Guichard, P.L. Lions, and J.M. Morel, “Axioms and fundamental equations of image processing,” Archive of Rational Mechanics, Vol. 123, pp. 199–257, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Angenent, “Parabolic equations for curves and surfaces Part II. Intersections, blow-up and generalized solutions,” Annals of Math., Vol. 133, pp. 171–215, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Babaud, A.P. Witkin, M. Baudin, and R.O. Duda, “Uniqueness of the Gaussian kernel for scale-space filtering,” IEEE PAMI, Vol. 8, pp. 26–33, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  4. W. Blaschke, Vorlesungen uber Differezialgeometrie II, Verlag von Julius Springer: Berlin, 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A.M. Bruckstein, R.J. Holt, A.N. Netravali, and T.J. Richardson, “Invariant signatures for planar shape recognition under partial occlusion,” CVGIP Image Understanding, Vol. 58, pp. 49–65, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A.M. Bruckstein, N. Katzir, M. Lindenbaum, and M. Porat, “Similarity invariant recognition of partly occluded planar curves and shapes,” Int. J. Comput. Vision, Vol. 7, pp. 271–285, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  7. A.M. Bruckstein and A.N. Netravali, “On differential invariants of planar curves and the recognition of partly occluded planar shapes,” AT&T Technical Memo, July 1990; also in Int. Workshop on Visual Form, Capri, May 1992.

  8. A.M. Bruckstein, G. Sapiro, and D. Shaked, “Affine invariant evolutions of planar polygons,” CIS Report No. 9202, Computer Science Department, Technion, I.I.T., Haifa 32000, Israel, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  9. A.M. Bruckstein and D. Shaked, “On projective invariant smoothing and evolution of planar curves and polygons,” CIS Report No. 9328, Computer Science Department, Technion, Israel, Nov. 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  10. A.M. Bruckstein and D. Shaked, “On projective invariant smoothing and evolution of planar curves,” Aspects of Visual Form Processing, C. Arcelli, L.P. Cordella, and G. Sanniti di Baja (Eds.), World Scientific, pp. 109–118, 1994.

  11. S. Buchin, Affine Differential Geometry, Science Press: Beijing, China, Gordon & Breach Science: New York, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M.G. Darboux, “Sur un probleme de geometrie elementaire,” Bull. Sci. Math., Vol. 2, pp. 298–304, 1878.

    Google Scholar 

  13. F. Dibos, “Projective invariant multiscale analysis,” CEREMADE Report 9533, Universite Paris 9 Dauphine, 1995.

  14. C.L. Epstein and M. Gage, “The curve shortening flow,” in Wave Motion, A.J. Chorin and A.J. Madja (Eds.), Springer Verlag, 1987.

  15. O. Faugeras, “On the evolution of simple curves of the real projective plane,” Comptes Rendus Acad. Sci. (Paris), Vol. 317, pp. 565–570, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  16. O. Faugeras, “Cartan's moving frame method and its application to the geometry and evolution of curves in the euclidean, affine, and projective planes,” INRIA TR-2053, Sept. 1993.

  17. M. Gage and R. Hamilton, “The shrinking of convex plane curves by the heat equation,” J. of Diff. Geometry, Vol. 23, pp. 69–96, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. Grayson, “The heat equation shrinks embedded plane curves to round points,” J. of Diff. Geometry, Vol. 26, pp. 285–314, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  19. B.B. Kimia, A.R. Tannenbaum, and S.W. Zucker, “Shapes, shocks, and deformations I: The components of shape and the reaction-diffusion space,” Int. J. of Computer Vision, Vol. 15, pp. 189–224, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  20. J.J. Koenderink, “The structure of images,” Biological Cybernetics, Vol. 50, pp. 363–370, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  21. E.P. Lane, A Treatise on Projective Differential Geometry, Univ. of Chicago Press: Chicago, 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  22. F. Mokhtarian and A.K. Mackworth, “Scale-based description and recognition of planar curves and two dimensional shapes,” IEEE Trans. on PAMI, Vol. 8, pp. 34–43, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  23. F. Mokhtarian and A.K. Mackworth, “A theory of multiscale, curvature-based shape representation for planar curves,” IEEE Trans. on PAMI, Vol. 14, pp. 789–805, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  24. T. Moons, E.J. Pauwels, L. Van Gool, and A. Oosterlinck, “Foundations of semi differential invariants,” Int. J. of Computer Vision, Vol. 14, pp. 25–47, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  25. P. Olver, G. Sapiro, and A. Tannenbaum, “Differential invariant signatures and flows in computer vision,” Comptes Rendus Acad. Sci. (Paris), Vol. 319, pp. 339–344, 1994 (see also, “Classification and Uniqueness of Invariant Geometric Flows,” MIT-LIDS Technical Report, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  26. B.M. ter Haar Romeny, Geometry Drive Diffusion in Computer Vision, Kluwer: Netherlands, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  27. G. Sapiro and A. Tannenbaum, “Affine invariant scale-space,” Int. J. of Computer Vision, Vol. 11, pp. 25–44, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  28. G. Sapiro and A. Tannenbaum, “Area and length preserving geometric invariant scale-spaces,” IEE PAMI, Vol. 17, pp. 67–72, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  29. R. Schwartz, “The pentagram map,” Experimental Mathematics, Vol. 1, pp. 71–81, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  30. L. Van Gool, T. Moons, E. Pauwels, and A. Oosterlink, “Semi-differential invariants,” DARPA/ESPRIT Workshop on Invariants, Reykjavik, Iceland, 1991.

  31. I. Weiss, “Projective invariants of shape,” Center for Automation Research Report, CAR-TR-339, 1988.

  32. I. Weiss, “Noise resistant invariants of curves,” IEEE Trans. on PAMI, Vol. 15, pp. 943–948, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  33. I. Weiss, “Geometric invariants and object recognition,” Int. J. of Computer Vision, Vol. 10, pp. 207–231, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  34. E.J. Wilczynski, Projective Differential Geometry of Curves and Ruled Surfaces, Teubner, Leipzig, 1906.

    Google Scholar 

  35. A.P. Witkin, “Scale-space filtering,” Int. Joint Conf. Art. Intelligence, pp. 1019–1021, 1983.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bruckstein, A.M., Shaked, D. On Projective Invariant Smoothing and Evolutions of Planar Curves and Polygons. Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision 7, 225–240 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008226427785

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008226427785

Navigation