Skip to main content
Log in

Implicit Epistemic Aspects of Constructive Logic

  • Published:
Journal of Logic, Language and Information Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the present paper I wish to regard constructivelogic as a self-contained system for the treatment ofepistemological issues; the explanations of theconstructivist logical notions are cast in anepistemological mold already from the outset. Thediscussion offered here intends to make explicit thisimplicit epistemic character of constructivism.Particular attention will be given to the intendedinterpretation laid down by Heyting. This interpretation, especially as refined in the type-theoretical work of Per Martin-Löf, puts thesystem on par with the early efforts of Frege andWhitehead-Russell. This quite recent work, however,has proved valuable not only in the philosophy andfoundations of mathematics, but has also foundpractical application in computer science, where thelanguage of constructivism serves as an implementableprogramming language, and within the philosophy oflanguage.\footnote{Nordstr\"{o}m et al. (1990) give an overview of the work in computerscience, whereas Ranta (1995) provides an impressiveconstructivist alternative to Montague Grammar usingthe richer type structure of Martin-L\"{o}f in placeof the simple classical type theory of Church.} Mypresentation will be carried out through a contrastwith standard metamathematical work.\footnote{Troelstra and van Dalen (1988) give an encyclopedictreatment of the metamathematics of constructivism.}In the course of the development I have occasion tooffer some novel considerations (in Sections~6 and 8) on thenature of proof and inference(-acts).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cohen, L.J., Los, J., Pfeiffer, H., and Podewski, K.-P., eds., 1982, Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science VI, Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenstad, J.E., 1971, Proceedings of the Second Scandinavian Logic Symposium, Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franchella, M., 1994, "Heyting’s contribution to the change in research into the foundations of mathematics," History and Philosophy of Logic 15, 149–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G., 1893, Grundgesetze der Arithmetik, Jena: H. Pohle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geach, P.T., 1965, "Assertion," Philosophical Review 74. Also in Geach (1972: 254–269).

    Google Scholar 

  • Geach, P.T., 1972, Logic Matters, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentzen, G., 1934–1935, "Untersuchungen über das logische Schliessen," Mathematische Zeitschrift 39, 176–210, 405–431. Also in M. Szabo, 1969, Collected Papers, Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentzen, G., 1936, "Die Widerspruchsfreihet der reinen Zahlentheorie," Mathematische Annalen 112, 493–565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R.M., 1970, "Meaning and speech acts," Philosophical Review 79, 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyting, A., 1930a, "Die formalen regeln der intuitionistischen Logik," Sitzungsberichte der preussischen Akademie von Wissenschaften, Phys-mat Klasse, pp. 42–56.

  • Heyting, A. 1930b, "Sur la logique intuitionniste," Acad. Roy. Belgique, Bull. Cl. Sci. V(16), 957–963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyting, A., 1931, "Die intuitionistische Grundlegung der Mathematik," Erkenntnis 2, 106–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyting, A., 1934, Mathematische Grundlagenforschung. Intuitionismus. Beweistheorie, Berlin: Julius Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyting, A, 1935, "Intuitionistische Wiskunde," Mathematica B 4, 72–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J., 1962, Knowledge and Belief, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, W.A., 1980, "The formula-as-types notion of construction," pp. 479–490 in To H.B. Curry: Essays on Combinatory Logic, Lambda Calculus and Formalism, J. Seldin and R. Hindley, eds., London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleene, S.C., 1952, Introduction to Metamathematics, Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolmogorov, A., 1932, "Zur Deutung intuitionistischen Logik," Mathematische Zeitschrift 35, 58–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenzen, W., 1978, "Recent work in epistemic logic," Acta Philosophica Fennica XXX(1).

  • Martin-Löf, P., 1982, "Constructive mathematics and computer programming," pp. 153–175 in Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science VI, L.J. Cohen et al., eds., Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin-Löf, P., 1987, "Truth of a proposition, evidence of a judgement, validity of a proof," Synthese 73, 407–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin-Löf, P., 1991, "A path from logic to metaphysics," pp. 141–149 in Atti del Congresso Nuovi Problemi della Logica e della Filosofia della Scienza, Viareggio, 8–13 gennaio 1990, Vol. II, Bologna: CLUEB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin-Löf, P., forthcoming, "Truth and knowability: on the principles C and K of Michael Dummett," in Truth in Mathematics, H.G. Dales and G. Oliveri, eds., Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Martin-Löf, P., "Verificationism then and now," pp. 187–196 in The Foundational Debate: Complexity and Constructivity in Mathematics and Physics, W. Schimanovich et al., eds., Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  • Martin-Löf, P., 1983, "On the meanings of the logical constants and the justifications of the logical laws," Nordic Journal of Philsophical Logic 1, 11–61. Text of lectures originally given in 1983 and distributed in 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin-Löf, P., 1994, "Analytic and synthetic judgements in type theory," pp. 87–99 in Kant and Contemporary Epistemology, P. Parrini, ed., Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monk, D., 1976, Mathematical Logic, Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordström, B., Petterson, K., and Smith, J.M., 1990, Programming in Martin-Löf’s Type Theory, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parrini, P., 1994, Kant and Contemporary Epistemology, Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prawitz, D., 1971, "Ideas and results in proof theory," pp. 235–307 in Proceedings of the Second Scandinavian Logic Symposium, J.E. Fenstad, ed., Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prawitz, D., 1965, Natural Deduction, Almqvist och Wiksell, Stockholm.

  • Quine, W.V., 1958, "Speaking of objects," pp. 1–25 W.V. Quine (1968). Originally published in Proceedings and Adresses of the American Philosophical Association 31

  • Quine, W.V., 1968, Ontological Relativity and Other Essays, New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranta, A., 1994, Type-Theoretical Grammar, Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schimanovich, W., De Pauli, Köhler, E., and Stadler, F., eds., 1995, The Foundational Debate: Complexity and Constructivity in Mathematics and Physics, Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schröder-Heister, P., 1981, "Untersuchungen zur regellogischen Deutung von Aussagenverknüpfungen," Dissertation, Bonn.

  • Seldin, J. and Hindley, R., eds., 1980, To H. B. Curry: Essays on Combinatory Logic, Lambda Calculus and Formalism, London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, S., ed., 1985a, Intensional Mathematics, Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, S., 1985b, "Epistemic and intuitionistic arithemetic" pp. 11–45 in Intensional Mathematics, S. Shapiro, ed., Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenius, E., 1960, Wittgenstein’s Tractatus, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundholm, B.G., 1983, "Constructions, proofs and the meaning of the logical constants," Journal of Philosophical Logic 12, 151–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundholm, B.G., 1986, "Proof theory and meaning," in Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Vol. III, Chapter III:8, D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner, eds., Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundholm, B.G., 1993, "Questions of proof," Manuscrito(Campinas) 16, 47–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundholm, B.G., 1994a, "Existence, proof and truth-making: A perspective on the intuitionisitc conception of truth," TOPOI 13, 117–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundholm, B.G., 1994b, ’Proof-theoretical semantics and Fregean identity-criteria for propositions," The Monist 77, 294–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiel, C., 1988, "Die Kontroverse um die intuitionistische Logik vor ihre Axiomatisierung durch Heyting im Jahre 1930," History and Philosophy of Logic 9, 67–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troelstra, A.S. and van Dalen, D., 1988, Constructivism in Mathematics, Vols. I, II, Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A.N. and Russell, B., 1910, Principia Mathematica, Vol. I, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L., 1922, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sundholm, G. Implicit Epistemic Aspects of Constructive Logic. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 6, 191–212 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008266418092

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008266418092

Navigation