Abstract
The main task of digital image processing is to recognize properties of real objects based on their digital images. These images are obtained by some sampling device, like a CCD camera, and represented as finite sets of points that are assigned some value in a gray-level or color scale. Based on technical properties of sampling devices, these points are usually assumed to form a square grid and are modeled as finite subsets of Z2. Therefore, a fundamental question in digital image processing is which features in the digital image correspond, under certain conditions, to properties of the underlying objects. In practical applications this question is mostly answered by visually judging the obtained digital images. In this paper we present a comprehensive answer to this question with respect to topological properties. In particular, we derive conditions relating properties of real objects to the grid size of the sampling device which guarantee that a real object and its digital image are topologically equivalent. These conditions also imply that two digital images of a given object are topologically equivalent. This means, for example, that shifting or rotating an object or the camera cannot lead to topologically different images, i.e., topological properties of obtained digital images are invariant under shifting and rotation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
L.V. Ahlfors and L. Sario, Riemann Surfaces, Princeton University Press: Princeton, New Jersey, 1960.
L. Boxer, “Digitally continuous functions,” Pattern Recognition Letters, Vol. 15, pp. 833–839, 1994.
M.P. do Carmo, Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces, Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1976.
L. Chen, “Topological structure in visual perception,” Science, Vol. 218, pp. 669–700, 1982.
L. Chen, “Topological structure in the perception of apparent motion,” Perception, Vol. 14, pp. 197–208, 1985.
L. Chen, “Holes and wholes: A reply to Rubin and Kanwisher,” Perception and Psychophysics, Vol. 47, pp. 47–53, 1990.
U. Eckhardt and L. Latecki, “Digital topology,” in Current Topics in Pattern Recognition Research, Research Trends, Council of Scientific Information: Trivandrum, India, 1994.
A. Gross, “Analyzing generalized tubular surfaces,” in Proceedings of SPIE's Conference on Intelligent Robots and Computer Vision, Boston 1994.
A. Gross and L. Latecki, “Digitizations preserving topological and differential geometric properties,” Computer Vision and Image Understanding, Vol. 62, pp. 370–381, Nov. 1995.
A. Gross and L. Latecki, “A Realistic digitization model of straight lines,” Computer Vision and Image Understanding, vol. 67, pp. 131–142, Aug. 1997.
Ch. Habel, “Prepositional and depictorial representations of spatial knowledge: The case of path-concepts,” in Logics and Natural Language, R. Studer (Ed.), Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1990.
G. Herman, “Discrete multidimensional Jordan surfaces,” CVGIP: Graphical Models and Image Processing, Vol. 54, pp. 507–515, 1992.
E. Khalimsky, R. Kopperman, and P.R. Meyer, “Computer graphics and connected topologies on finite ordered sets,” Topology and its Applications, Vol. 36, pp. 1–17, 1990.
T.Y. Kong and A.W. Roscoe, “Continuous analogs of axiomatized digital surfaces,” Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, Vol. 29, pp. 60–86, 1985.
T.Y. Kong and A.W. Roscoe, “A theory of binary digital pictures,” Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, Vol. 32, pp. 221–243, 1985.
T.Y. Kong and A. Rosenfeld, “Digital topology: Introduction and survey,” Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, Vol. 48, pp. 357–393, 1989.
T.Y. Kong and J.K. Udupa, “Ajustification of a fast surface tracking algorithm,” Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing: Graphical Models and Image Processing, Vol. 54, pp. 162–170, 1992.
L. Latecki, U. Eckhardt, and A. Rosenfeld, “Well-composed sets,” Computer Vision and Image Understanding, Vol. 61, pp. 70–83, 1995.
L. Latecki and F. Prokop, “Semi-proximity continuous functions in digital images,” Pattern Recognition Letters, Vol. 16, pp. 1175–1187, 1995.
M. Minsky and S. Papert, “Perceptrons. An introduction to computational geometry,” The MIT Press: Cambridge, Mass., 1969.
E.E. Moise, Geometric Topology in Dimensions 2 and 3, Springer-Verlag, 1977.
D.G. Morgenthaler and A. Rosenfeld, “Three-dimensional digital topology,” Information and Control, Vol. 51, pp. 227–247, 1981.
G.L. Naber, Topological Methods in Euclidean Spaces, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1980.
T. Pavlidis, Algorithms for Graphics and Image Processing, Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1982.
A. Rosenfeld, “Digital topology,” American Mathematical Monthly, Vol. 86, pp. 621–630, 1979.
A. Rosenfeld, “‘Continuous’ functions on digital pictures,” Pattern Recognition Letters, Vol. 4, pp. 177–184, 1986.
A. Rosenfeld and A.C. Kak, Digital Picture Processing, Academic Press: New York, 1982.
J. Serra, Image Analysis and Mathematical Morphology, Academic Press: New York, 1982.
L.N. Stout, “Two discrete forms of the Jordan curve theorem,” American Mathematical Monthly, Vol. 95, pp. 332–336, 1988.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Latecki, L.J., Conrad, C. & Gross, A. Preserving Topology by a Digitization Process. Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision 8, 131–159 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008273227913
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008273227913