Abstract
We present a computational cognitive model of novice and expert aviation pilot action planning called ADAPT that models performance in a dynamically changing simulated flight environment. We perform rigorous tests of ADAPT's predictive validity by comparing the performance of individual human pilots to that of their respective models. Individual pilots were asked to execute a series of flight maneuvers using a flight simulator, and their eye fixations and control movements were recorded in a time-synched database. Computational models of each of the 25 individual pilots were constructed, and the individual models simulated execution of the same flight maneuvers performed by the human pilots. The time-synched eye fixations and control movements of individual pilots and their respective models were compared, and rigorous tests of ADAPT's predictive validity were performed. The model explains and predicts a significant portion of pilot visual attention and control movements during flight as a function of piloting expertise. Implications for adaptive training systems are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen, J. F. and Perrault, C. R.: 1980, Analyzing intention in utterances. Artificial Intelligence, 15, 143-178.
Anderson, D. A.: 1989, Artificial Intelligence and Intelligent Systems. Wiley and Sons, New York.
Anderson, J. R.: 1993, Rules of the Mind, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Anderson, J. R. and Douglass, S.: (in press). Visual attention and problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition.
Broadbent, D. E.: 1993, Comparison with human experiments. In: D. E. Broadbent (ed.), The simulation of human intelligence. Blackwell, Cambridge, MA, pp. 198-217.
Chase, W. G. and Ericsson, K. A.: 1982, Skill and working memory. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 16, 1-8.
Doane, S. M., Mannes, S. M., Kintsch, W. and Polson, P. G.: 1992, Modeling User Command Production: A Comprehension-Based Approach. User Modeling and User Adapted Interaction, 2(3), 249-285.
Doane, S. M., McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, W., Polson, P. G. and Clawson, D.: 1992, Prompt comprehension in UNIX command production. Memory and Cognition, 20(4), 327-343.
Doane, S. M. and Sohn, Y.W.: 1999, Instrument Scanning as a Function of Piloting Expertise. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Doane, S. M., Sohn, Y. W., Adams, D. and McNamara, D. S.: 1994, Learning from instruction: A comprehension-based approach. Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Atlanta, GA: Erlbaum, pp. 254-259.
Doane, S. M., Sohn, Y. W., McNamara, D. S. and Adams, D.: (in press). Comprehension-based skill acquisition. Cognitive Science.
Dogan, P.: 1991, The instrument flight training manual. Santa Clarita, CA: Aviation Book Company.
Dreyfus, H. L.: 1996, Response to my critics. Artificial Intelligence, 80, 171-191.
Dreyfus, H. L.: 1992, What computers still can't do: A critique of artificial reason. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
Ericsson, K. A. and Kintsch, W.: 1995, Long-term working memory. Psychological Review, 102, 211-245.
Federal Aviation Administration: 1980, Instrument flying handbook. U.S. Department of transportation.
Fox, J., Merwin, D., Marsh, R., Sohn, Y., Doane, S., Kramer, A., Lintern, G. and Wickens, C.: 1995, Modeling pilot skill acquisition. Paper presented at the Biennial Aviation Psychology Conference. Columbus, OH.
Gernsbacher, M. A.: 1990, Language comprehension as structure building. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Hoecker, D. G., Corker, K. M., Roth, E. M., Lipner, M. H. and Bunzo, M. S.: 1994, Man-machine design and analysis system (MIDAS) applied to a computer-based procedure-aiding system. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Part 1, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Nashville, TN, pp. 195-199.
Holyoak, K. J.: 1991, Symbolic connectionism: toward third-generation theories of expertise. In: K. A. Ericsson and J. Smith (eds.), Toward a general theory of expertise, Cambridge University Press, pp. 301-336.
Holyoak, K. J. and Thagard, P.: 1989, Analogical mapping by constraint satisfaction. Cognitive Science, 13, 295-355.
Just, M. A. and Carpenter, P. A.: 1992, A capacity theory of comprehension. Psychological Review, 99, 122-149.
Kintsch, W.: 1998, Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Kintsch, W.: 1988, The use of knowledge in discourse processing: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163-182.
Kintsch, W.: 1994, The psychology of discourse processing. In: M. A. Gernsbacher (ed.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics, Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 721-739.
Kitajima, M. and Polson, P. G.: 1995, A comprehension-based model of correct performance and errors in skilled, display-based, human-computer interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 43, 65-99.
Lovett, M. C. and Anderson, J. R.: 1996, History of success and current context in problem solving. Cognitive Psychology, 31, 168-217.
Mannes, S. M. and Doane, S. M.: 1991, A hybrid model of script generation: Or getting the best of both worlds. Connection Science, 3(1), 61-87.
Mannes, S. M. and Kintsch, W.: 1991, Routine computing tasks; Planning as understanding. Cognitive Science, 15(3), 305-342.
Meyer, D. E. and Kieras, D. E.: 1997, A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic Mechanisms. Psychological Review, 104, 3-65.
Miller, J. R. and Kintsch, W.: 1980, Readability and recall of short prose passages: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 335-354.
Newell, A.: 1987, Unified theories of cognition (The 1987 William James Lectures). Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Recker, M. M. and Pirolli, P.: 1995, Modeling individual di¡erences in students' learning strategies. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4, 1-38.
Rosenbloom, P. S., Laird, J. E. and Newell, A.: 1991, Toward the knowledge level in SOAR: The role of architecture in the use of knowledge. In: K. VanLehn (ed.), Architectures For Intelligence. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 75-112.
Rosenbloom, P. S., Laird, J. E., Newell, A. and McCarl, R.: 1991, A preliminary analysis of the SOAR architecture as a basis for general intelligence. Artificial Intelligence, 47, 289-325.
Rouse, W. B., Geddes, N. D. and Curry, R. E.: 1988, An architecture for intelligent interfaces: Outline of an approach to supporting operators of complex systems. Human-Computer Interaction, 3, 87-122.
Schank, R. C. and Abelson, R. P.: 1977, Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Schmalhofer, F. and Tschaitschian, B.: 1993, The acquisition of a procedure schema from text and experiences. Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. (pp. 883-888). Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 883-888.
Selfridge, O. G.: 1998, Pandemonium: A paradigm for learning. In: J. A. Anderson and E. Rosenfeld (eds.), Neurocomputing: Foundations of Research. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 117-122
Sohn, Y. W. and Doane, S. M.: 1997, Cognitive constraints on computer problem solving skills. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 3, 288-312.
Thagard, P.: 1989, Explanatory coherence. Brain and Behavioral Sciences, 12, 435-467.
Turner, A. A. and Greene, E.: 1978, Construction and use of a propositional text base. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 8 MS, 1713-1758.
van Dijk, T. A. and Kintsch, W.: 1983, Strategies of discourse comprehension. Academic Press, New York.
VanLehn, K.: 1988, Student modeling. In: M. C. Polson and J. J. Richardson (eds.), Foundations of intelligent tutoring systems. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 55-76.
VanLehn, K., (ed.): 1991, Architectures For Intelligence. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1991, pp. 75-112.
Wilensky, R.: Why John married Mary: Understanding stories involving recurring goals. Cognitive Science, 2, 235-266.
Zachary, W.: 1996, Interface agents in complex systems. In: C. A. Ntuen and E. H. Park (eds.), Human Interaction with Complex Systems: Conceptual Principles and Design Practice. Kluwer, Norwell, MA, pp. 397-401.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Doane, S.M., Sohn, Y.W. ADAPT: A Predictive Cognitive Model of User Visual Attention and Action Planning. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 10, 1–45 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008311003128
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008311003128