Abstract
In this paper we present some concepts and their relations that are necessary for modeling autonomous agents in an environment that is governed by some (social) norms. We divide the norms over three levels: the private level the contract level and the convention level. We show how deontic logic can be used to model the concepts and how the theory of speech acts can be used to model the generation of (some of) the norms. Finally we give some idea about an agent architecture incorporating the social norms based on a BDI framework.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
N. Asher & D. Bonevac 1996. Prima facie obligation, Studia Logica 57(1), 19-45.
C. Boutilier 1994. Toward a logic for qualitative decision theory, in Jon Doyle et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Int. Conf. on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, San Francisco (CA): Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 75-86.
P. Cohen & H. Levesque 1991. Teamwork Nous 35, 487-512.
Conte, R. & C. Castelfranchi 1995. Cognitive and Social Action. London: UCL Press.
F. Dignum & R. Conte 1997. Intentional agents and goal formation, in M. Singh et al. (eds.), ATAL-97, Providence, USA, pp. 219-231.
F. Dignum & B. van Linder 1997. Modelling social agents: Communication as actions, in M. Wooldridge J. Muller & N. Jennings (eds.), Intelligent Agents III (LNAI-1193), Springer-Verlag, pp. 205-218.
F. Dignum, J.-J.Ch. Meyer, & R. Wieringa 1994. A dynamic logic for reasoning about sub-ideal states, in J. Breuker (ed.), ECAI Workshop on Artificial Normative Reasoning, Amsterdam, pp. 79-92.
F. Dignum & H. Weigand 1995. Modeling communication between cooperative systems, in J. Iivari, K. Lyytinen & M. Rossi (eds.), Advanced Information Systems Engineering, Berlin: Springer, pp. 140-153.
H. Herrestad & C. Krogh 1995. Deontic logic relativised to bearers and counterparties, in J. Bing & O. Torrund (eds.), Anniversary Anthology in Computers and Law, Tano A.S., pp. 453-522.
N. Jennings 1993. Commitments and conventions: The foundation of coordination in multiagent systems, Knowledge Engineering Review 8(3), 223-250.
N. Jennings & J. Campos 1997. Towards a social level characterisation of socially responsible agents, IEEE Proceedings on Software Engineering 144(1), 11-25.
A. Jones & I. Pörn 1985. Ideality, sub-ideality and deontic logic, Synthese 65, 275-290.
D. Kinny & M. Georgeff 1991. Commitment and effectiveness of situated agents, In Proceedings IJCA Intelligence, Sydney: Australia, pp. 82-88.
B. van Linder, W. van der Hoek & J.-J.Ch. Meyer 1996. How to motivate your agents. On making promises that you can keep, in Wooldridge, Müller & Tambe (eds.), Intelligent Agents II, LNCS 1037, pp. 17-32.
J. Muller 1996. A cooperation model for autonomous agents, In J. P. Müller, M. J. Wooldridge, & N. R. Jennings (eds.), Intelligent Agents III — Proceedings of (ATAL-96), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
T. J. Norman, N. R. Jennings, P. Faratin, & E. H. Mamdani 1996. Designing and implementing a multi-agent architecture for business process management, in J. P. Müller, M. J. Wooldridge, & N. R. Jennings (eds.), Intelligent Agents III — Proceedings of (ATAL-96), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
H. Prakken & M. Sergot 1996. Contrary-to-duty obligations, Studia Logica 57(1), 91-115.
A.S. Rao & M.P. Georgeff 1991. Modeling rational agents within a BDI-architecture, in J. Allen, R. Fikes & E. Sandewall (eds.), Proceedings 2nd Int. Conf. on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, San Mateo (CA): Morgan Kaufmann, 473-484.
E. Verharen, F. Dignum, & H. Weigand 1996. A language/action perspective on cooperative information agents, in E. Verharen, N. van der Rijst & J. Dietz (eds.), Proceedings International Workshop on Communication Modeling (LAP-96), Oisterwijk: The Netherlands, pp. 40-53.
H. Weigand, E. Verharen, & F. Dignum 1996. Interoperable transactions in business models: A structured approach, in P. Constantopoulos, J. Mylopoulos & Y. Vassiliou (eds.), Advanced Information Systems Engineering (LNCS 1080), Springer, pp. 193-209.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dignum, F. Autonomous agents with norms. Artificial Intelligence and Law 7, 69–79 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008315530323
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008315530323