Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamics of Transmission Provision in a Competitive Power Industry

  • Published:
Discrete Event Dynamic Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main objective of this paper is to revisit the operations and planning of an electric power system, and, more specifically, of its transmission system. The intent is to formulate the underlying problems as decision-making problems with specific performance objectives. Once this is done, it becomes possible to identify open research questions on this subject, including their dependence on the overall industry structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allan, R. N., Borkowska, B., and Brigg, C. H. 1974. Probabilistic analysis of power flows. IEE Proceedings 121(12): 1551–1555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allan, R. N., Leite da Silva, A. M., and Burchett, R. C. 1981. Evaluation methods and accuracy in probabilistic load flow solutions. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems PAS-100(5): 2539–2546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldick, R., Kim, B. H., Chase, C., and Loo, Y. 1998. A fast distributed implementation of optimal power flow.IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. PE-167-PWRS-0-04-1998.

  • Bensoussan, A. 1981. Singular perturbation results for a class of stochastic control problems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control AC-26: 1071–1080.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertsekas, D. P. 1995. Dynamic Programming and Optimal Control, vol. 1. Athena Scientific.

  • Bertsekas, D. P., and Tsitsikiis J. 1996. Neuro-Dynamic Programming. Athena Scientific.

  • Borkowska, B. 1974. Probabilistic loadflow. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems PAS-93(3): 752–759.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadwalader, M. D., Harvery, S. M., Pope, S. L., and Hogan, W. W. 1998. Market coordination of transmission loading relief across multiple regions. Draft.

  • Caramanis, M. C. 1981. Investment planning under optimal spot pricing of electricity. MIT Energy Laboratory working paper MIT-EL 81-051WP.

  • Chao, H., and Wilson, R. 1987. Priority service, investment, and market organization. The American Economic Review 77(5): 899–916.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chao, H., and Peck, S. 1996. A market mechanism for electric power transmission. Journal of Regulatory Economics 10(1): 25–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chao, H. and Peck, S. 1997. An institution design for an electricity contract market with central dispatch. The Energy Journal 18(1): 85–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crew, M., and Kleindorfer, P. R. 1979. Public Utility Economics. New York: St. Martin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delebecque, F., and Quadrat, J. P. 1978. Contribution of stochastic control singular perturbation averaging and team theories to an example of large-scale systems: Management of hydropower production. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control AC-23: 209–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delebecque, F., Quadrat, J. P. 1981. Optimal control of Markov chains admitting strong and weak interactions. Automatica 17: 281–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descamps, F., and Feltin, L. 1995. A new model to assess the composite adequacy and the operating costs of large interconnected power systems. Proceedings of the Powertech Conference. Stochdem, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A. K., and Pindyck, R. S. 1994. Investments Under Uncertainty. New York: Princeton University Press. FERC World Wide Web site. http://www.ferc.fed.us

    Google Scholar 

  • Guan, X., and Luh, P. B. 1999. Integrated resource scheduling and bidding in deregulated electric power market: New challenges. The Journal on Discrete Event Dynamic Systems, this issue.

  • Haddad, A. H., and Kokotović, P. V. 1977. Stochastic control of linear singularly perturbed systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control AC-22: 815–821.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, W. W. 1992. Contract networks for electric power transmission. Journal of Regulatory Economics 4: 211–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalil, H., and Gajić, Z. 1984. Near-optimum regulators for stochastic linear singularly perturbed systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control AC-29: 531–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchmayer, L. K. 1985. Economic Operation of Power Systems. John Wiley & Sons Inc.

  • Klir, G., and Yuan, B. 1995. Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic: Theory and Applications. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall PTR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lecinq, B. 1996. Peak-load pricing for transmission. Master thesis, MIT Department of Technology and Policy Program.

  • Lecinq, B., and Ilić, M. D. 1997. Peak-load pricing for electric power transmission. Proceedings of the Hawaii Conference on System Sciences, pp. 624–632.

  • Leite da Silva, A. M., Arienti, V. L., and Allan, R. N. 1984. Probabilistic load flow considering dependence between input nodal powers. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems PAS-103(6): 1524–1530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leotard, J.-P. 1999. Transmission pricing and incentives for investments under uncertainty in the deregulated power industry. Master thesis, MIT Department of Technology and Policy Program.

  • Lerner, P. A., and Ilić, M. D. 1997. On the value of transmission systems: Incentives for investment under open access. Proceedings of the 18th Annual North American Conference on International Energy Markets, Competition and Policy. San Francisco, CA.

  • McGuire, B. 1999. Power grid decentralization. University of California Energy Institute, POWER Report PWR-065.

  • Oren, S. 1997. Economic inefficiency of passive transmission rights in congested electricity systems with competitive generation. The Energy Journal 18(1).

  • Pedrycz, W. 1993. Fuzzy Control and Fuzzy Systems. England: Research Studies Press LTD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramadge, P. J., and Wonham, W. M. 1987. Supervisory control of a class of discrete event processes. SIAM J. Control and Optimization 25(1): 206–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S. 1980. A Course in Simulation.New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubenstein, R. 1981. Simulation and the Monte Carlo Method. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauer, P. W. 1982. Constrained stochastic power flow analysis. Electric Power Systems Research 5: 87–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweppe, F. C., Caramanis, M. C., Tabors, R. D., and Bohn, R. E. 1988. Spot Pricing of Electricity. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  • Visudhiphan, P., and Ilić, M. D. 1999. Dynamic games-based modeling of electricity markets. Proceedings of the IEEE PES Winter Meeting. New York, NY.

  • Wellman, M. P., Walsh, W. E., Wurman, P. R., and MacKie-Mason, J. K. 1998. Some economics of market-based distributed scheduling. Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems. Amsterdam.

  • Wilson, R. 1989. Efficient and competitive rationing. Econometrica 57(1): 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. 1997. Implementation of priority insurance in power exchange markets. The Energy Journal 18(l): 111–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, F., Varaiya, P., Spiller, P., and Oren, S. 1992. Folk theorems on transmission open access: Proofs and counter examples. University of California Energy Institute. POWER report PWP-023.

  • Yu, C.-N. 1999. Hierarchical congestion management for a deregulated power industry. PhD Thesis, MIT Department of Mechanical Engineering.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yu, CN., Leotard, JP. & Ilic, M.D. Dynamics of Transmission Provision in a Competitive Power Industry. Discrete Event Dynamic Systems 9, 351–388 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008350416476

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008350416476

Navigation