Skip to main content
Log in

Multisection in Interval Branch-and-Bound Methods for Global Optimization II. Numerical Tests

  • Published:
Journal of Global Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We have investigated variants of interval branch-and-bound algorithms for global optimization where the bisection step was substituted by the subdivision of the current, actual interval into many subintervals in a single iteration step. The results are published in two papers, the first one contains the theoretical investigations on the convergence properties. An extensive numerical study indicates that multisection can substantially improve the efficiency of interval global optimization procedures, and multisection seems to be indispensable in solving hard global optimization problems in a reliable way.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berner, S. (1995), Ein paralleles Verfahren zur verifizierten globalen Optimierung, Dissertation, Universität Wuppertal.

  2. Berner, S. (1996), New results on verified global optimization, Computing 57, 323-343.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Csallner, A.E., T. Csendes, and M.Cs. Markót: Multisection in Interval Branch-and-Bound Methods for Global Optimization I. Theoretical Results. Accepted for publication 7. Global Opimization.

  4. Csendes, T. and Pintér, J. (1993), The impact of accelerating tools on the interval subdivision algorithm for global optimization, European J. of Operational Research 65, 314-320.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Csendes, T. and Ratz, D. (1997), Subdivision direction selection in interval methods for global optimization, SIAM J. Numerical Analysis 34, 922-938.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hammer, R., Hocks, M., Kulisch, U., and Ratz, D. (1993), Numerical Toolbox for Verified Computing I., Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hansen, E. (1992), Global optimization using interval analysis, Marcel Dekker, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Knüppel, O. (1993), BIAS — basic interval arithmetic subroutines, Technical Report 93.3, University of Hamburg-Harburg.

  9. Kearfott, R. B. (1995), A FORTRAN-90 Environment for Research and Prototyping of Enclosure Algorithms for Constrained and Unconstrained Nonlinear Equations, ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software 21, 63-78.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Klatte, R., Kulisch, U., Lawo, C., Rauch, M., and Wiethoff, A. (1993), C-XSC — A C++ Class Library for Extended Scientific Computing, Springer, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Klatte, R., Kulisch, U., Neaga, M., Ratz, D., and Ullrich, Ch. (1992), PASCAL-XSC — Language Reference with Examples, Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ratschek, H. and Rokne, J. (1993) Interval Methods, In: Horst R. and Pardalos P. M. (eds.): Handbook of Global Optimization, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 751-828.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ratz, D. (1992), Automatische Ergebnisverifikation bei globalen Optimierungsproblemen. Dissertation, Universität Karlsruhe.

  14. Ratz, D. and Csendes, T. (1995), On the selection of Subdivision Directions in Interval Branch-and-Bound Methods for Global Optimization, J. Global Optimization 7, 183-207.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Csaba Markót, M., Csendes, T. & Csallner, A.E. Multisection in Interval Branch-and-Bound Methods for Global Optimization II. Numerical Tests. Journal of Global Optimization 16, 219–228 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008359223042

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008359223042

Navigation