Abstract
In this paper it is shown how a partial semantics for presuppositions can be given which is empirically more satisfactory than its predecessors, and how this semantics can be integrated with a technically sound, compositional grammar in the Montagovian fashion. Additionally, it is argued that the classical objection to partial accounts of presupposition projection, namely that they lack “flexibility,” is based on a misconception. Partial logics can give rise to flexible predictions without postulating any ad hoc ambiguities. Finally, it is shown how the partial foundation can be combined with a dynamic system of common-ground maintenance to account for accommodation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Asher, N. and Lascarides, A., 1998, “The semantics and pragmatics of presupposition,” Journal of Semantics 15, 239–299.
Atlas, J., 1975, “Frege's polymorphous concept of presupposition and its role in a theory of meaning,” Semantikos 1, 29–44.
Atlas, J., 1976, “On the semantics of presupposition and negation: An essay in philosophical logic and the foundations of language,” Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Princeton.
Beaver, D., 1992, “The kinematics of presupposition,” pp. 17–36 in Proceedings of the Eight Amsterdam Colloquium, P. Dekker and M. Stokhof, eds., Amsterdam: ILLC.
Beaver, D., 1994a, “When variables don't vary enough,” pp. 35–60 in Proceedings SALT IV, M. Harvey and L. Santelman, eds., Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
Beaver, D., 1994b, “Accommodating topics,” pp. 439–448 in The Proceedings of the IBM/Journal of Semantics Conference on Focus, Vol. 3, R. van der Sandt and P. Bosch, eds., Heidelberg: IBM (revised version to appear in Context Dependence in the Analysis of Linguistic Meaning, B. Partee and H. Kamp, eds.).
Beaver, D., 1995, “Presupposition and assertion in dynamic semantics,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Edinburgh, to appear with CSLI Publications.
Beaver, D., 1997, “Presupposition,” pp. 939–1008 in Handbook of Logic and Language, J. van Benthem and A. ter Meulen, eds., Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.
Beaver, D., 1999, “Presupposition accommodation: A plea for common sense,” in Logic, Language and Computation, Vol. 2, L. Moss, J. Ginzburg, and M. de Rijke, eds., Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Belnap, N., 1979, “A useful four valued logic,” pp. 8–37 in Modern Uses of Multiple-Valued Logics, J. Dunn and G. Epstein, eds., Dordrecht: Reidel.
Bergmann, M., 1981, “Presupposition and two-dimensional logic,” Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 27–53.
Blamey, S., 1986, “Partial logic,” pp. 1–70 in Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Vol. 3, D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner, eds., Dordrecht: Reidel.
Blau, U., 1978, Die Dreiwertige Logik der Sprache, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Blok, P., 1993, “The interpretation of focus,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.
Bochvar, D., 1939, “Ob odnom trehznachom iscislenii i ego primeneii k analizu paradoksov klassicskogo rassirennogo funkcional 'nogo iscislenija',” Matematiciskij sbornik 4, 287–308. (English translation (1981): "On a three-valued logical calculus and its applications to the analysis of the paradoxes of the classical extended functional calculus,” History and Philosophy of Logic 2, 87–112.)
Burton-Roberts, N., 1989, The limits to Debate: A Revised Theory of Semantic Presupposition, Cambridge Studies in Linguistics, Vol. 51, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Church, A., 1940, “A formulation of the simple theory of types,” Journal of Symbolic Logic 5, 56–68.
Cooper, R., 1983, Quantification and Syntactic Theory, Dordrecht: Reidel.
Dowty, D., Wall, R., and Peters, S., 1981, Introduction to Montague Semantics, Synthese Language Library, Vol. 11, Dordrecht: Reidel.
Feferman, S., 1984, “Towards useful type free theories I,” Journal of Symbolic Logic 49, 75–111.
Frege, G., 1892, “Ñber Sinn und Bedeutung,” Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik 100, 25–50 (English translation in Philosophical Writing of Gottlob Frege, P. Geach and M. Black, eds., Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1960, pp. 56–78).
Gallin, D., 1975, Intensional and Higher Order Modal Logic, Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Gamut, L.T.F., 1991, Logic, Language, and Meaning, Vol. 2: Intensional Logic and Logical Grammar, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Gazdar, G., 1979, Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition and Logical Form, New York: Academic Press.
Geurts, B., 1994, “Presupposing,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Osnabrück.
Gilmore, P., 1974, “The consistency of partial set theory without extensionality,” in Axiomatic Set Theory, Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, Vol. 13, Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
Groenendijk, J. and Stokhof, M., 1984, “Studies on the semantics of questions and the pragmatics of answers,” Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Hausser, R., 1976, “Presuppositions in Montague grammar,” Theoretical Linguistics 3, 245–280.
Heim, I., 1983, “On the projection problem for presuppositions,” pp. 114–125 in Proceedings of the Second West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, M. Barlow, ed., Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
Herzberger, H., 1973, “Dimensions of truth,” Journal of Philosophical Logic 2, 535–556.
Horn, L., 1985, “Metalinguistic negation and pragmatic ambiguity,” Language 61, 121–174.
Humberstone, L., 1981, “From worlds to possibilities,” Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 313–339.
Kamp, H. and Reyle, U., 1993, From Discourse to Logic. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Karttunen, L., 1973, “Presuppositions of compound sentences,” Linguistic Inquiry 4, 167–193.
Karttunen, L., 1974, “Presupposition and linguistic context,” Theoretical Linguistics 1, 181–194.
Karttunen, L. and Peters, S., 1979, “Conventional implicature,” pp. 1–56 in Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 11: Presupposition, C. Oh and D. Dinneen, eds., New York: Academic Press.
Keenan, E., 1973, “Presuppositions in natural logic,” Monist 57, 344–370.
Kerber, M. and Kohlhase, M., to appear, “Reasoning without believing: On the mechanization of presuppositions and partiality,” in Computational Logics for Natural Language Understanding, Nutt and Mandahar, eds., Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Kleene, S., 1952, Introduction to Metamathematics, Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Kracht, M., 1994, “Logic and control: How they determine the behaviour of presuppositions,” in Logic and Information Flow, J. van Eijck and A. Visser, eds., Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Krahmer, E., 1994, “Partiality and dynamics,” pp. 391–410 in Proceedings of the Ninth Amsterdam Colloquium, P. Dekker and M. Stokhof, eds., Amsterdam: ILLC.
Krahmer, E., 1998, Presupposition and Anaphora, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Krahmer, E. and van Deemter, K., 1997, “Partial matches and the interpretation of anaphoric noun phrases,” pp. 205–210 in Proceedings of the Eleventh Amsterdam Colloquium, P. Dekker and M. Stokhof, eds., Amsterdam: ILLC.
Krahmer, E. and van Deemter, K., 1998, “On the interpretation of anaphoric noun phrases: Towards a full understanding of partial matches,” Journal of Semantics 15, 355–392.
Krahmer, E. and Piwek, P., 1999, “Presupposition projection as proof construction,” pp. 281–300 in Computing Meaning, H. Bunt and R. Muskens, eds., Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Langendoen, D. and Savin, H., 1971, “The projection problem for presuppositions,” pp. 55–60 in Studies in Linguistic Semantics, C. Fillmore and D. Langendoen, eds., New York: Holt.
Langholm, T., 1988, Partiality, Truth and Persistence, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Lewis, D., 1979, “Scorekeeping in a language game,” Journal of Philosophical Logic 8, 339–359.
Link, G., 1986, “Prespie in pragmatic wonderland or: The projection problem for presuppositions revisited,” pp. 101–126 in Foundations of Pragmatics and Logical Semantics, J. Groenendijk, D. de Jongh, and M. Stokhof, eds., Dordrecht: Foris.
Martin, J., 1979, “Some misconceptions in the critique of semantic presupposition,” Theoretical Linguistics 6, 235–282.
Montague, R., 1974, “The proper treatment of quantification in ordinary English,” pp. 247–270 in Formal Philosophy, Selected Papers of Richard Montague, R. Thomason, ed., New Haven: Yale University Press.
Muskens, R., 1989, “Meaning and partiality,” Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Amsterdam (published by CSLI Publications, Stanford, 1995).
Peters, S., 1975, “A truth-conditional formulation of Karttunen's account of presupposition,” Texas Linguistic Forum 6, 137–149.
Russell, B., 1905, “On denoting,” Mind 14, 479–493.
Seuren, P., 1980, “Dreiwertige Logic und die Semantik natürlicher Sprache,” pp. 72–103 in Grammatik und Logik, J. Ballweg and H. Glinz, eds., Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Soames, S., 1979, “A projection problem for speaker presuppositions,” Linguistic Inquiry 10(4), 623–666.
Stalnaker, R., 1974, “Pragmatic presuppositions,” pp. 197–214 in Semantics and Philosophy, M. Munitz and P. Unger, eds., New York: New York University Press.
Strawson, P., 1950, “On referring,” Mind 59, 21–52.
Strawson, P., 1952, Introduction to Logical Theory, London: Methuen.
Thijsse, E., 1992, “Partial logic and knowledge representation,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Eburon Publishers, Delft.
Thomason, S., 1979, “Truth-value gaps, many truth-values and possible worlds,” pp. 357–369 in Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 11: Presupposition, C. Oh and D. Dinneen, eds., New York: Academic Press.
Van der Sandt, R., 1989, “Presupposition and discourse structure,” pp. 267–294 in Semantics and Contextual Expression, R. Bartsch, J. van Benthem, and P. van Emde Boas, eds., Dordrecht: Foris.
Van der Sandt, R., 1992, “Presupposition projection as ananphora resolution,” Journal of Semantics 9, 333–377.
Van der Sandt, R., to appear, “Discourse semantics and echo-quotation,” Linguistics and Philosophy.
Van Fraassen, B.C., 1971, Formal Semantics and Logic, New York: MacMillan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Beaver, D., Krahmer, E. A Partial Account of Presupposition Projection. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 10, 147–182 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008371413822
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008371413822