Skip to main content
Log in

Whole Life Cost: The Future Trend in Software Development

  • Published:
Software Quality Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Whole life costing refers to the cost of ownership of a product from initial concept until eventual retirement with all cost categories taken into consideration. Traditionally software engineers have only been interested in the software development life cycle. This paper surveys research into whole life cost research in industry and finds that interest is greatest where the market is most competitive. In recent years the falling cost of computers has lead to increasing use of whole life cost in the marketing and advertising of IT products though there is very little published case study data available. Trends in other industries have shown that research will increase until more data is available and whole life costing is considered part of the normal design methodology. It will also be included in university computer science courses to train the professionals of the future in whole life cost techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bradley, M. and Dawson, R. J. 1996. Gaining acceptance of software whole life cost by IT staff, Proc. First Psychology of Programming Interest Group Postgraduate Student Workshop, Group D Publications, Matlock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, M., and Dawson, R. J. 1998a. An analysis of obsolescence risk in IT systems, Proc. Software Quality Management SQM '98, BCS, Amsterdam, pp. 209–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, M., and Dawson, R. J. 1998b. The ultimate quality metric, Proc. Empirical Assessment in Software Engineering EASE’ 98, University of Keele, pp. 161–165.

  • British Standards Institute. 1997. Guide to life cycle costing, BS5760: Part23: IEC 300-3-3.

  • Compac Computer Ltd. 1997. A guide to high availability servers, October.

  • Context. 1995. Cost of ownership of page printers.

  • Current Research in Great Britain. 1997. Physical sciences, 12th ed., London, Cartermill.

  • Dhillon, B. 1989. Life Cycle Costing, London, Gordon and Breach.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, D. B. 1957. Economic evaluation of industrial power systems reliability, AIEEE Trans. Applications Ind., 76 Part II: 264–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenton N. E. 1992. Software metrics, London, Chapman and Hall.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gartner Group. 1998. Total cost of ownership analysis.

  • Hewson, D. 1996. The mouse is turning into a pest on PCs, Sunday Times, April 14.

  • HMSO. 1996. Statement on the Defence Estimates, May.

  • Knezevic J. 1993. Reliability, maintainability and support—a probablistic approach. London, McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labour Market Trends. 1998. Retail Prices—Section 6.2, January.

  • Microsoft. 1998. Microsoft briefing resource CD, Version 4, May.

  • Pearce R. 1995. Demonstration of a genetic algorithm for preliminary design, Internal Rolls-Royce report covering the preliminary design of a gas turbine engine.

  • Rand Corporation. 1994. The US Submarine Production Base—an analysis of cost, schedule and risk for selected force structures.

  • Sun Microsystems. 1998. Business essentials.

  • Zona Research Inc. 1996. Desktop clients: a cost of ownership study.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bradley, M., Dawson, R. Whole Life Cost: The Future Trend in Software Development. Software Quality Journal 8, 121–131 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008904926757

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008904926757

Navigation