Skip to main content
Log in

TQM implementation factors for software development: an empirical study

  • Published:
Software Quality Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is a need for methodologies which can enhance the quality of software and improve software developmental efficiencies. One such approach commonly used by software development enterprises is Total Quality Management (TQM). To assess the effectiveness of a TQM program, a key question that is often posed is: What are the salient underlying constructs (factors) essential to a successful TQM program? This study examines these issues in the domain of software development. An analysis of the data gathered from 247 software development sites shows 8 factors pertinent to an effective TQM program in software development. Also, this study compares and contrasts these factors with the Malcolm Baldrige Award criteria and other published results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • S.L. Ahire, D.Y. Golhar and M.A. Waller. Development and validation of TQM implementation constructs. Decision Sciences, 27 (1996), 23–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.C. Anderson, M. Rungtusanatham and R.G. Schroeder. A theory of quality management underlying the deming management method. The Academy of Management Review, 19, (1994), 472–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • L.J. Arthur, Improving Software Quality: An Insider's Guide to TQM. (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • C.M. Beath and W.J. Orlikowski. The contradictory structure of systems development methodologies: deconstructing the is-user relationship in information engineering. Information Systems Research, 5 (1994), 350–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • S.A. Black and L.J. Porter. Identification of the critical factors of TQM. Decision Sciences, 27, (1996), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Braithwaite. Information Service Excellence Through TQM: Building Partnerships for Business Process Reengineering and Continuous Improvement. (ASQC Quality Press, Milwaukee, WI, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • L.J. Cronbach and P.E. Meehl. Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, (1955), 281–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.W. Dean, Jr. and D.E. Bowen. Management theory and total quality: improving research and practice through theory development. The Academy of Management Review, 19, (1994), 392–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Fox and W. Frakes. Elements of the quality paradigm. Communications of the ACM, 40, (1997), 26.

    Google Scholar 

  • A.L. Fuller and E.B. Swanson. Information centers as organizational innovation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 9, (1992), 47–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. George. The Baldrige Quality System: The Do-It-Yourself Way to Transform Your Business. (John Wiley & Sons., Inc., New York, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • R.B. Grady. Software failure analysis for high-return process improvement decisions. Hewlett-Packard Journal, 47, (1996), 15–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Greising. Quality: how to make it pay. Business Week, August 8, (1994), 54–59.

  • H.H. Harman. Modern Factor Analysis. (Academic Press, New York, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • W.S. Humphrey. Managing the Software Process. (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Ince. ISO 9001 and Software Quality Assurance. (McGraw-Hill Book Company, England, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • K.E. Kendall and J.E. Kendall. Systems Analysis and Design. (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Kim and C.W. Mueller. Factor analysis: statistical methods and practical issues. Sage University Paper series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA, 1978), vol. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • V. Merlyn and J. Parkinson. Development Effectiveness: Strategies for IS Organizational Transition. (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, New York, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • W.J. Miller, J.D. Jordan and W.M. Lankford. Total quality management in higher education: a review of literature. Proceedings of the Decision Sciences Southwest Region Conference, 1993, 65–68.

  • M.C. Paulk, B. Curtis, M.B. Chrissis and C.V. Weber. Capability maturity model for software, version 1.1. CMU/SEI-93-TR-24. Software Engineering Institute, February 1993.

  • L.J. Porter and A.J. Parker. Total quality management — the critical success factors. Total Quality Management, 4, (1993), 13–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • T.C. Powell. Total quality management as competitive advantage: a review and empirical study. Strategic Management Journal, 16, (1995), 15–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Rai, S. Borah and A. Ramaprasad. Critical success factors for strategic alliances in the information technology industry: an empirical study. Decision Sciences, 27, (1996), 141–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • R.K. Reger, L.T. Gustafson, S.M. Demarie and J.V. Mullane. Reframing the organization: why implementing total quality is easier said than done. The Academy of Management Review, 19, (1994), 565–584.

    Google Scholar 

  • C.A. Reeves and D.A. Bednar. Defining quality: alternatives and implications. Academy of Management Review, 19, (1994), 419–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.V. Saraph, P.G. Benson and R.G. Schroeder, An instrument for measuring the critical factor of quality management. Decision Sciences, 20, (1989), 810–829.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schonberger. World Class Manufacturing (Free Press, Collier Macmillan, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • E.I. Schwartz. Trust me, I'm your software. Discover, 17, (1996), 78–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • V. Sethi and W.R. King. Construct measurement in information systems research: an illustration in strategic systems. Decision Sciences, 22, (1991), 455–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Stevens. Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • A.R. Tenner and I.J. DeToro. Total Quality Management: Three Steps to Continuous Improvement (Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc., Reading, MA, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • L.M. Tobin. The new quality landscape: total quality management. Journal of Systems Management, 41, (1990), 10–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Van de Ven and D. Ferry. Measuring and Assessing Organizations. (Wiley, New York, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Yourdon. Decline and Fall of the American Programmer (Yourdon Press, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Zahedi. Quality Information Systems (Boyd & Fraser Publishing Company, Danvers, MA, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • R.E. Zultner. TQM for technical teams. Communications of the ACM, 36, (1993), 79–91.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Parzinger, M.J., Nath, R. TQM implementation factors for software development: an empirical study. Software Quality Journal 7, 239–260 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008931305952

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008931305952

Navigation