Skip to main content
Log in

Integrating Exploration, Localization, Navigation and Planning with a Common Representation

  • Published:
Autonomous Robots Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two major themes of our research include the creation of mobile robot systems that are robust and adaptive in rapidly changing environments, and the view of integration as a basic research issue. Where reasonable, we try to use the same representations to allow different components to work more readily together and to allow better and more natural integration of and communication between these components. In this paper, we describe our most recent work in integrating mobile robot exploration, localization, navigation, and planning through the use of a common representation, evidence grids.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bauer, R. 1995. Active manoeuvres for supporting the localisation process of an autonomous mobile robot. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 16:39–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borenstein, J. and Koren, Y. 1991. The vector field histogram—fast obstacle avoidance for mobile robots. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 7(3):278–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chenavier, F. and Crowley, J. 1992. Position estimation for a mobile robot using vision and odometry. In Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, IEEE: Nice, France, pp. 2588–2592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves, K., Adams, W., and Schultz, A. 1997. Continuous localization in changing environments. In Proc. of the 1997 IEEE Int. Symp. on Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation, IEEE: Monterey, CA, pp. 28–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, J. and Schmidt, M. 1995. Continuous localization of a mobile robot based on 3D-laser-range-data, predicted sensor images, and dead-reckoning. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 14:99–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, K. and Murphy, R. 1992. Ultrasonic robot localization using Dempster-Shafer theory. In 1992 SPIE Stochastic Methods in Signal Processing and Computer Vision, invited session on applications for vision and robotics.

  • Hughes, K., Tokuta, A., and Ranganathan, N. 1992. Trulla: An algorithm for path planning among weighted regions by localized propagations. In Proc. of the 1992 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Raleigh, NC, pp. 469–475.

  • Koenig, S. and Simmons, R. 1998. Xavier: A robot navigation architecture based on partially observable Markov decision process models. In Artificial Intelligence and Mobile Robots, Kortenkamp, Bonasso, and Murphy (Eds.), AAAI Press, pp. 91–122.

  • Lee, W. 1996. Spatial semantic hierarchy for a physical robot. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Computer Sciences, The University of Texas, Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, J., Durrant-Whyte, H., and Cox, I. 1992. Dynamic map building for an autonomous mobile robot. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 11:286–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, F. and Milios, E. 1994. Robot pose estimation in unknown environments by matching 2-D range scans. In Proc. IEEE Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, IEEE: Seattle, pp. 935–938.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mataric, M. 1992. Integration of representation into goal-driven behavior-based robots. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 8(3):304–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravec, H. and Elfes, A. 1985. High resolution maps from wide angle sonar. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 116–121.

  • Moravec, H.P. 1988. Sensor fusion in evidence grids for mobile robots. AI Magazine, 61–74.

  • Murphy, R., Hughes, K., and Noll, E. 1996. An explicit path planner to facilitate reactive control and terrain preferences. In Proc. of the 1996 IEEE International Conf. on Robotics and Automation, pp. 2067–2072.

  • Schiele, B. and Crowley, J. 1994. A comparison of position estimation techniques using occupancy grids. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 12:163–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, A. and Adams, W. 1998. Continuous localization using evidence grids. In Proc. of the 1998 IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, Leuven, Belgium, pp. 2833–2839.

  • Thrun, S. 1998. Learning metric-topological maps for indoor mobile robot navigation. Artificial Intelligence, 99:21–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrun, S. and Bücken, A. 1996. Integrating grid-based and topological maps for mobile robot navigation. In Proc. of the Thirteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-96), Portland, OR, pp. 944–950.

  • Yamauchi, B. 1996. Mobile robot localization in dynamic environments using dead reckoning and evidence grids. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, IEEE: New York, NY, pp. 1401–1406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamauchi, B. 1997. A frontier-based approach for autonomous exploration. In Proc. of the 1997 IEEE International Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation, pp. 146–151.

  • Yamauchi, B. 1998. Frontier-based exploration using multiple robots. In Proc. of the Second International Conference on Autonomous Agents (Agents'98), Minneapolis, MN.

  • Yamauchi, B., Schultz, A., and Adams, W. 1998. Mobile robot exploration and map-building with continuous localization. In Proc. of the 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Leuven, Belgium, pp. 3715–3720.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schultz, A.C., Adams, W. & Yamauchi, B. Integrating Exploration, Localization, Navigation and Planning with a Common Representation. Autonomous Robots 6, 293–308 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008936413435

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008936413435

Navigation