Abstract
This paper presents numerical results from the application of a case-based reasoning approach to several repetitive operations research problems. These experiments are applications of the ideas presented in the previous framework paper, Part I. The three combinatorial optimization problems explored in this paper are the knapsack problem, the travelling salesman problem and the uncapacitated plant location problem. These numerical experiments permit a comparison of the performance of this technique across these three problem classes as well as with the traditional solution algorithms.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dongarra, J.J. (1992). “Performance of Various Computers Using Standard Linear Equations Software.” Oak Ridge National Laboratory and University of Tennessee.
Dudzinski, K. and S. Walukiewicz. (1987). “Exact Methods for the Knapsack Problem and its Generalizations.” European Journal of Operational Research 28, 3–21.
Erlenkotter, D. (1978). “A Dual-Based Procedure for Uncapacitated Facility Location.” Operations Research 26, 992–1069.
Fayard, D. and G. Plateau. (1982). “An Algorithm for the Solution of the 0-1 Knapsack Problem.” Computing 28, 269–287.
Kraay, D.R. and P.T. Harker. (1996). “Case-Based Reasoning for Repetitive Combinatorial Optimization Problems, Part I: Framework.” Journal of Heuristics 2, 55–85.
Lawler, E.L. et al. (eds.), (1985). The Traveling Salesman Problem: A Guided Tour of Combinatorial Optimization. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Nemhauser, G.L. and Wolsey, L.A. (1988). Integer and Combinatorial Optimization. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kraay, D.R., Harker, P.T. Case-Based Reasoning for Repetitive Combinatorial Optimization Problems, Part II: Numerical Results. Journal of Heuristics 3, 25–42 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009620815820
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009620815820