Skip to main content
Log in

Adaptation as a Morphing Process: A Methodology for the Design and Evaluation of Adaptive Organizational Structures

  • Published:
Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Changes in objectives, in resources, or in the environment may necessitate the adaptation of an organization from one form to another. However, in many cases, the organizations need to continue functioning while adaptation takes place, i.e., it is not possible to stop the organizational activity in order to reorganize, and then start again. In this case, adaptation can be expressed as a morphing process in which the organization transitions from one form with its attendant task allocation to a different one through a series of incremental steps that preserve overall functionality and performance. Coordination between organization members during adaptation is critical. A computational model for this type of organizational adaptation at the operational level is presented. The model is implemented using the Colored Petri Net formulation of discrete event dynamical systems. A design methodology that utilizes this model is outlined and a simple example is used to illustrate the approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Carley, K.M. (forthcoming), “Organizational Adaptation,” Annals of Operations Research.

  • Carley, K.M. (1995), “Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory: Perspectives and Directions,” Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 1(1), 39–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carley, K.M. and M.J. Prietula (1994), “ACTS Theory: Extending the Model of Bounded Rationality,” in K.M. Carley and M.J. Prietula (Eds.) Computational Organization Theory, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carley, K.M. and D.M. Svoboda (1996), “Modeling Organizational Adaptation as a Simulated Annealing Process,” Sociological Methods & Research, 25(1), 138–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M.D., J.G. March and J.P. Olsen (1972) “A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(1), 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demaël, J.J., and A.H. Levis (1994), “On Generating Variable Structure Architectures for Decision Making Systems,” Information and Decision Technologies, 19, 233–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drenick, R.F. (1986), A Mathematical Organization Theory. New York, NY: Elsevier Science Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grevet J.L. and A.H. Levis (1988), “Coordination in Organizations with Decision Support Systems,” Proc. 1988 Symposium on Command and Control Research, Washington, DC: National Defense University, 387–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, K. (1992), Coloured Petri Nets: Basic Concepts, Analysis Methods and Practical Use. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levis, A.H. (1984), “Information Processing and Decisionmaking Organizations: A Mathematical Description,” Large Scale Systems, 7, 151–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levis, A.H. (1998), “System Architectures,” in A.P. Sage and W.B. Rouse (Eds.) Systems Engineering and Management Handbook, New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levis, A.H. and K.L. Boettcher (1983), “Decisionmaking Organizations with Acyclical Information Structures,” IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 13(3), 384–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, Z. and A.H. Levis (1992), “Coordination in Distributed Decision Making,” Proc. 1992 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Chicago, IL: IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone, T.W. (1987), “Modeling Coordination in Organizations and Markets,” Management Science, 33(10), 1317–1332.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G. (1978), “Bounded Rationality, Ambiguity, and the Engineering of Choice,” Bell J. of Economics, 9(2), 585–608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, P.J. and A.H. Levis (1987), “Measures of Effectiveness and C3 Testbed Experiments,” Proc. 1987 Symposium on Command and Control Research, Washington, DC: National Defense University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monguillet, J.-M. and A.H. Levis (1993), “Modeling and Evaluation of Variable Structure Command and Control Organizations,” in C. Jones (Ed.) Toward a Science of Command, Control, and Communications, Washington, DC: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murata, T. (1989), “Petri Nets: Propeties, Analysis, and Applications,” Proc. of the IEEE, 77(4), 541–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perdu, D.M. (1997), “Distributed Process Coordination in Adaptive Command and Control Teams,” Report GMU/C3I-184-TH, Ph. D. Dissertation, Fairfax, VA: George Mason University.

  • Salas, E., T.L. Dickinson, S.A. Converse and S.I. Tannenbaum, (1992), “Toward an Understanding of Team Performance and Training,” in R.W. Swezey and E. Salas (Eds.) Teams: Their Training and Performance, Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serfaty, D. and E.E. Entin (1995), “Shared Mental Models and Adaptive Team Coordination,” Proc. of the First International Symposium on Command and Control Research and Technology, Washington, DC: National Defense University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. (1976), Administrative Behavior (3rd edition). New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vroom, V.E. and P.W. Yetton (1973), Leadership and Decision Making. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaidi, A.K. and A.H. Levis (1997), “Algorithmic Design of Distributed Intelligence System Architectures,” in M. M. Gupta and N. S. Sinha (Eds.) Intelligent Control Systems: Theory and Applications, Piscatatway, NJ: IEEE Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaidi, A.K. and A.H. Levis (1997), “Validation and Verification of Decision Making Rules,” Automatica, 33(2), 155–169.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Perdu, D.M., Levis, A.H. Adaptation as a Morphing Process: A Methodology for the Design and Evaluation of Adaptive Organizational Structures. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory 4, 5–41 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009628813441

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009628813441

Navigation