Skip to main content
Log in

Feedforward Neural Networks Based Input-Output Models for Railway Carriage System Identification

  • Published:
Neural Processing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Depending on the representation ability of neural networks for a nonlinear process, this paper develops procedures to locate the input space dimensions of feedforward neural networks for general practical nonlinear systems identification when only the outputs are accessible observations. The size of the input space is directly related to the involved system order. Hence based on our developed model, we are able to determine whether the system is faulty or not by monitoring the output error change. The methods are demonstrated in vibration signals that were measured by an accelerometer mounted on a traction centre of a railway carriage running at about 60 mph along the Hong Kong railway.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. Isermann, “Process fault detection based on modelling and estimation methods – a survey”, Automatica, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 387–404, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R.J. Patton, P.M. Frank and R.N. Clark, “Fault Diagnosis in Dynamic Systems: Theory and application”, Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  3. K.S. Narendra and K. Parthasarthy, “Identification and control of dynamical systems using neural networks”, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 4–27, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  4. T. Sorsa, H.N. Koivo and H. Koivisto, “Neural networks in process fault diagnosis”, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man & Cybernetics, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 815–825, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  5. K.S. Narendra and K. Parthasarthy, “Identification and control of dynamical systems using neural networks”, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 4–27, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  6. T. Sorsa and H. Koivisto, “Neural Networks in Process Fault Diagnosis”, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man & Cybernetics, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 815–825, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. Naidu, E. Zafiriou and T.J. Mcavoy, “Use of neural networks for failure detection in a control system”, IEEE Control System Magazine, Vol. 10, pp. 49–55, April 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M.J. Willis, C. Di, G.A. Montague, M.T. Tham and A.J. Morris, “Artificial neural networks in process engineering”, IEE Proc.-D, Vol. 138, No. 3, pp. 256–266, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J.C. Hoskins, K.M. Kaliyur and D.M. Himemlblau, “Fault diagnoses in complex chemical plants using artificial neural networks”, AIChE Journal, Vol. 37, pp. 137–141, January 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M.F. Abdel Mageed, A.F. Sakr and A. Bahgat, “Fault detection and identification using a hierarchical neural network-based system”, Proceedings of the IECON '93. International Conference on Industrial Electronics Control, and Instrumentation, pp. 338–342, Vol. 1.

  11. R.J. Patton, J. Chen and T.M. Siew, “Fault diagnosis in nonlinear dynamic systems via neural networks”, International Conference on Control '94, Vol. 2, pp. 1346–1351.

  12. M.J. de la Fuente and P. Vega, “A neural networks based approach for fault detection and diagnosis: application to a real process”, Proceedings of the Fourth IEEE Conference on Control Applications, pp. 188–193, 1995.

  13. S. Fararooy and J. Allan, “On-line condition monitoring of railway signalling equipment using neural networks-based intelligent sensors”, IEE Colloquium on ‘Intelligent Measuring Systems for Control Applications’, pp. 7/1–3, 1995.

  14. S.G. Tzafestas and P.J. Dalianis, “Fault diagnosis in complex systems using artificial neural networks”, Proceedings of the Third IEEE Conference on Control Applications, Vol. 2, pp. 877–882, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Vladik Ya. Kreinovich, “Arbitrary nonlinearity is sufficient to represent all functions by neural networks: A Theorem”, Neural Networks, Vol. 4, pp. 381–383, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  16. G.V. Puskorius and L.A. Feldkamp, “Neurocontrol of nonlinear dynamical systems with Kalman filter trained recurrent networks”, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 279–297, March 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  17. L. Jin, P.N. Nikiforur and M.M. Gupta, “Adaptive model reference control of discrete-time nonlinear systems using neural networks”, Control Theory and Advanced Technology, Vol. 10, No. 4, Part 3, pp. 1379–1399, September 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  18. T.L. Ruchti, R.H. Brown and J.J. Garside, “Kalman based artificial neural network training algorithms for nonlinear system identification”, Proceedings of the 1993 International Symposium on Intelligent Control, pp. 582–587, 1993.

  19. Asriel V. Levin and Kumpati S. Narendra, “Identification using feedforward networks”, Neural Computation, Vol. 7, pp. 349–357, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  20. A.U. Levin and K.S. Narendra, “Control of nonlinear dynamical systems using neural networks, Part II: observability, identification and control”, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, Vol. 7, No. 1, January 1996.

  21. C.L. Nikias and A.P. Petropuou, Higher-Order spectra analysis: A Nonlinear Signal Processing Framework, Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jitendra K. Tugnait, “Consistent order selection for noncausal autoregressive models via higher-order statistics”, Automatica, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 311–320, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  23. C.T. Leung, T.W.S. Chow and Y.F. Yam, “A novel least third-order cumulants objective function”, Neural Processing Letter, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 91–99, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chow, T.W., Shuai, O. Feedforward Neural Networks Based Input-Output Models for Railway Carriage System Identification. Neural Processing Letters 5, 57–67 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009666009129

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009666009129

Navigation