Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Taxonomy of Spatial Data Integrity Constraints

  • Published:
GeoInformatica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Spatial data quality has become an issue of increasing concern to researchers and practitioners in the field of Spatial Information Systems (SIS). Clearly the results of any spatial analysis are only as good as the data on which it is based. There are a number of significant areas for data quality research in SIS. These include topological consistency; consistency between spatial and attribute data; and consistency between spatial objects’ representation and their true representation on the ground. The last category may be subdivided into spatial accuracy and attribute accuracy. One approach to improving data quality is the imposition of constraints upon data entered into the database. This paper presents a taxonomy of integrity constraints as they apply to spatial database systems. Taking a cross disciplinary approach it aims to clarify some of the terms used in the database and SIS fields for data integrity management. An overview of spatial data quality concerns is given and each type of constraint is assessed regarding its approach to addressing these concerns. Some indication of an implementation method is also given for each.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. Aronoff. Geographic Information Systems: A Management Perspective. WDL Publications: Ottawa, Canada, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Chadwick. “An Architecture to support business rules in custom GIS applications,” in Proceedings: 18th AM/FM International Conference, 1047–1058, 1995.

  3. F.C. Collins and J.L. Smith, “Taxonomy for error in GIS,” in Proceedings: International symposium on spatial accuracy in Natural Resource Data Bases “Unlocking the puzzle,” R.G. Congalton (Ed.), American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Williamsburg, Virginia, 1–7, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R.G. Congalton. International symposium on spatial accuracy in Natural Resource Data Bases “Unlocking the puzzle.” American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Williamsburg, Virginia, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. Date. “A contribution to the study of database integrity,” in Relational Database Writings 1985–1989, (pp. 185–215), Addison Wesley: Saratoga, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M.J. Egenhofer. “Pre-processing Queries with spatial constraints,” Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 60(6):783–790, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M.J. Egenhofer and A.U. Frank. “LOBSTER: combining AI and database technologies for GIS,” Photogrammatic Engineering and Remote Sensing, 56(6):919–926, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M.J. Egenhofer and R.D. Franzosa. “Point-set Topological Relations,” International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 5(2):161–174, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. Elmasri and S. Navathe. Fundamentals of Database Systems, Benjamin/Cummings, 1994.

  10. C. Fahrner, T. Marx, and S. Philippi. Integration of Integrity Constraints into Object Oriented database schema according to ODMG-93 (RR-9-95), University of Koblenz, 1995.

  11. P.G. Firns. “An Extended Entity Relationship Model Applicable to the design of Spatially Referenced Databases,” Ph.D. Thesis, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  12. H.W. Fowler and F.G. Fowler (Eds.). The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Current English (Ninth Edition), Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  13. O. Günther and J. Lamberts. “Object-oriented Techniques for the Management of Geographic and Environmental Data,” The Computer Journal, 37(1):16–25, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  14. T. Hadzilacos and N. Tryfona. “A model for expressing topological integrity constraints in geographic databases,” in Proceedings: Theories and Methods of Spatio-Temporal Reasoning in Geographic Space. International Conference GIS—From Space to Territory, A.U. Frank, I. Campari, and U. Formentini (Ed.), Pisa, Italy, 252–268, 1992.

  15. T. Hadzilacos and N. Tryfona. “Logical data modelling for geographic applications,” International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 10(2):179–200, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  16. G.J. Hunter. “Management issues in GIS: Accuracy and Data Quality,” in Proceedings: Conference on managing Geographic Information Systems for success, G.J. Hunter (Ed.), Aurisa: Melbourne, Australia, 95–101, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  17. C. Jones and L. Luo. “Hierarchies and objects in a deductive spatial database,” in Proceedings: Advances in GIS research: Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on spatial data handling, R.G. Healy (Ed.), 589–603, 1994.

  18. P.C. Kanellakis, G. Kuper, and P.Z. Revesz. “Constraint Query Languages,” Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 51(1):26–52, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  19. R. Laurini and F. Milleret-Raffort. “Using integrity constraints for checking consistency of spatial databases,” in Proceedings: GIS/LIS 91, Atlanta, Georgia, 634–642, 1991.

  20. L. Luo and C. Jones. “A deductive database model for GIS,” in Innovations in GIS 2, P. Fisher (Ed.), Taylor and Francis, 33–42, 1995.

  21. D.F. Marble. “The extended data dictionary: A critical element in building viable spatial databases,” in Proceedings: 11th annual ESRI user conference, 1990.

  22. C.B. Medeiros and M.J. Andrade. “Implementing Integrity Control in Active Data Bases,” Journal of Systems and Software, 27:171–181, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  23. C.B. Medeiros and M. Cilia. “Maintenance of binary topological constraints through active databases,” in Proceedings: 3rd ACM International Workshop on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, P. Bergougnoux (Ed.), Baltimore, Maryland, USA, 127–133, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  24. C.B. Medeiros and G.C. Magalhaes. Rule application in GIS–a case study (DCC-18/93), UNICAMP, 1993.

  25. T. Smith, R. Ramakrishnan, and A. Voisard. “An Object-Based Data Model and a Deductive Language for Spatio-Temporal Database Applications,” in Proceedings: Proceedings of the Workshop of the BRA Esprit project “GOODS”, M. Gambosi, Scholl and P. Widmayer (Ed.), Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  26. M. Stonebraker and G. Kemnitz. “The Postgres next-generation database management system,” Communications of the ACM, 34(10):78–92, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  27. T. Ubeda and S. Servigne. “Geometric and Topological Consistency of Spatial Data,” in Proceedings: 1st International Conference on Geocomputation, Leeds, UK, 830–842, 1996.

  28. M.F. Worboys. GIS: A Computing Perspective, Taylor and Francis: London, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Information Science, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand

    Sophie Cockcroft

Authors
  1. Sophie Cockcroft
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cockcroft, S. A Taxonomy of Spatial Data Integrity Constraints. GeoInformatica 1, 327–343 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009754327059

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009754327059

Search

Navigation