Skip to main content
Log in

Trading Financial Derivatives on the Web—An Approach Towards Automating Negotiations on OTC Markets

  • Published:
Information Systems Frontiers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Derivative instruments have become increasingly important to financial institutions, institutional investors, traders and private individuals throughout the world, both as risk-management tools and as a source of revenue. The volume of over-the-counter (OTC) traded derivatives has increased enormously over the past decade, because institutional investors have often had a need for special derivative products which are not traded on organized exchanges. An important feature of OTC trading is the bargaining on multiple attributes of a contract such as price, strike price and contract maturity. Negotiation on multiple attributes of a deal is currently not supported by electronic trading floors. In this paper we describe an approach of how to automate the multi-attribute multilateral negotiations using a Web-based trading system. First, we will give an overview of various approaches to supporting or automating negotiations on multiple attributes. Then we will introduce multi-attribute auctions, an extension of single-sided auction theory and analyze preliminary game-theoretic results. Finally, we will show a Web-based electronic trading system for OTC derivatives, based on multi-attribute auctions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alty JL, Griffiths D, Jennings NR, Mamdani EH, Struthers A, Wiegand ME. ADEPT–Advanced Decision Environment for Process Tasks: Overview and Architecture. Paper presented at the BCS Expert Systems 94 Conference (Applications Track), Cambridge, UK, 1994.

  • Backhaus K, Erichson B, Plinke W, Weiber R. Multivariate Analysemethoden. (8th edn.). Berlin, Germany: Springer, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beam C, Bichler M, Krishnan R, Segev A. On negotiations and deal making in electronic markets. Information Systems Frontiers 1999;1:(1 and 2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bichler M, Kaukal M, Segev A. Multi-attribute auctions for electronic procurement. Paper presented at the First IBM IAC Workshop on Internet Based Negotiation Technologies, Yorktown Heights, NY, March 18–19, 1999.

  • Bichler M, Kumar M, Jhingran A. Competitive Bidding on Multiple Attributes. Hawthorne, NY, USA: IBM Watson Research Lab., 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binmore K, Vulkan N. Applying game theory to automated negotiation. Netnomics 1999;1(1):1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branco F. The Design of Multidimensional Auctions. RAND Journal of Economics 1997;28(1):63–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chavez A, Maes P. Kasbah: An Agent Marketplace for Buying and Selling Goods. Paper presented at the First International Conference on the Practical Application of Intelligent Agents and Multi-Agent Technology (PAAM'96), London, UK, 1996.

  • Che Y-K. Design Competition through Multidimensional Auctions. RAND Journal of Economics 1993;24(4):668–680.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clemen RT. Making Hard Decisions: An Introduction to Decision Analysis. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Co., 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cripps M, Ireland N. The design of auctions and tenders with quality thresholds: the symmetric case. The Economic Journal 1994;104:316–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta S, Spulber DF. Managing procurement auctions. Information Economics and Policy 1989;4:5–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelbrecht-Wiggans R. On a possible benefit to bid takers from using multi-stage auctions. Management Science 1989;34(9): 1109–1120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foroughi A. A Survey of the User of Computer Support for Negotiation. Journal of Applied Business Research Spring 1995;121–134.

  • Friedman D, Rust J. (Eds.). The Double Auction Market– Institutions, Theories, and Evidence. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman D, Sunder S. Experimental Methods: A Primer for Economists. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagel JH. Auctions: A Survey of Experimental Research. In: J. H. Kagel & A. E. Roth, eds., The Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995;501–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeny RL, Raiffa H. Decision Making with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kersten GE, Noronha SJ. Negotiation and the Internet: Users’ Expectations and Acceptance. Carleton University. Available: http://interneg.carleton.ca/interneg/ research/interneg/inspireusers/ 1998.

  • Koppius OR. Electronic multidimensional auctions: trading mechansims and applications. Paper presented at the Edispuut Workshop ‘98: E-Commerce–Crossing Boundaries, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 1998.

  • Kumar M, Feldman SI. Internet Auctions. Paper presented at the 3rd USENIX Workshop on Electronic Commerce, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, 1998.

  • Laffont J-J, Tirole J. A Theory of Incentives in Procurement and Regulation. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAfee R, McMillan PJ. Auctions and Bidding. Journal of Economic Literature 1987;25:699–738.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin RM. Over-the-Counter Derivative Products. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom PR, Weber RJ. A Theory of Auctions and Competitive Bidding. Econometrica 1982;50:1089–1122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moukas A, Guttman R, Zacharia G, Maes P. Agent-mediated Electronic Commerce: An MIT Media Laboratory Perspective. To appear in International Journal of Electronic Commerce 1999.

  • Myerson RB. Optimal auction design. Mathematics of Operations Research 1981;6:58–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins WC, Hershauer JC, Foroughi, A. Delaney M. Can a Negotiation Support System Help a Purchasing Manager. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management Spring 1996;37–45.

  • Rosenschein JS, Zlotkin G. Rules of Encounter: Designing Conventions for Automated Negotiation Among Computers. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothkopf MH, Pekec A. Computationally Manageable Combinatorial Auctions. Paper presented at the Maryland Auction Conference, Maryland, May 29–31, 1998.

  • Saaty TL. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York, USA: McGraw Hill, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandholm T. Approaches to winner determination in combinatorial auctions. Decision Support Systems. To appear 1999.

  • Sierra C, Faratin P, Jennings NR. A Service-Oriented Negotiation Model between Autonomous Agents. Paper presented at the Proc. 8th European Workshop on Modeling Autonomous Agents in a Multi-Agent World (MAAMAW-97), Ronneby, Sweden, 1997.

  • Thiel SE. Multidimensional Auctions. Economics Letters 1988;28:37–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varian H. Economic Mechanism Design for Computerized Agents. Paper presented at the Usenix Workshop on Electronic Commerce, New York, 1995.

  • Vickrey W. Counterspeculation, Auctions, and Competitive Sealed Tenders. Journal of Finance 1961;(3):8–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson R. Strategic Analysis of Auctions. In R. J. Aumann S. Hart (Eds.), Handbook of Game Theory Vol. I, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1992;227–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfstetter E. Auctions: An Introduction. Journal of Economic Surveys 1996;10(4):367–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wurman PR, Walsh WE, Wellman MP. Flexible Double Auctions for Electronic Commerce: Theory and Implementation. Decision Support Systems 1998;24:17–27.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bichler, M. Trading Financial Derivatives on the Web—An Approach Towards Automating Negotiations on OTC Markets. Information Systems Frontiers 1, 401–414 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010070109801

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010070109801

Navigation