Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Why Catalonia cannot be considered as a regional innovation system

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present a model to assess the systemness of an innovation system. Patent and citation datawith an institutional address in Catalonia (1986-1996) were analyzed in terms of relationallinkages and the development in these distributions over time was evaluated using methods fromsystems dynamics. Relational linkages are extremely scarce. A transition at the system's levelcould be indicated around 1990 when using institutional addresses, but not when using cognitivecategories. The institutional restructuring has led to changes in the pattern of linkages(coauthorship, etc.), but the reproduction of the system's knowledge base has remaineddifferentiated. We conclude that although a system in several other respects, Catalonia cannot(yet) be considered as a (knowledge-based) innovation system. The existence of a mechanism forthe integration could not be indicated at the regional level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arthur, W. B. (1989), Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events, Economic Journal, 99: 116-131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacaria, J., S. Borras alomar (1998), The Catalan innovation system. Governing rapid changes, In:H.-J. Braczyk, P. Cooke, M. Heidenreich (Eds). Regional Innovation Systems,University College London Press, London, Bristol PA, pp. 72-97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barcelo i Roca, M. (1993), Innovacio tecnologica i industria a Catalunya, La Llar de Llibre, Barcelona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blauwhof, G. (1995), The Non-Linear Dynamics of Technological Developments: An Exploration of Telecommunications Technology, Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of Amsterdam.

  • Blume, Stuart S. (1992), Insight and Industry: The Dynamics of Technological Change in Medicine, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borras Alomar, S. (1995), Governing Systems of Innovation: Regions and Technology in Europe. The case study of Catalonia in the 1980s and 1990s. Ph.D. Thesis, mimeo, Instituto Universitario Europeo, Florence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. ( 1999), Schöne neue Arbeitswelt, Campus Verlag, Frankfurt, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, M., F. Narin (1981), The adequacy of the Science Citation Index (SCI) as an indicator of international scientific activity, Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 32: 430-439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (1997), The Power of Identity, Blackwell, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coles, S., Cimoli, M. (Eds), 2000, Developing Innovation System: Mexico in the Global Context, Continuum Publishing Group, London, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commissio Interdepartamental de Recerca i Innovacio Tecnologica (1997) II Pla de Recerca de Catalunya 1997/2000, Generalitat de Catalunya, Barcelona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of the European Communities, and Commission of the European Communities (1992) Treaty on European Union, Office for Offical Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, P. (1998), Introduction. The origins of the concept, In: Regional Innovation Systems, H.-J. Braczyk, P. Cooke, M. Heidenreich (Eds), University College London Press, London, Bristol PA, pp. 2-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, P., M. G. Uranga, G. Etxebarria (1997), Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions, Research Policy, 26: 475-491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, P., M. G. Uranga, G. Etxebarria (1998), Regional systems of innovation: An evolutionary perspective, Environment and Planning A, 30, 1563-1584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, R., D. Foray (1997), The Economics of Codification and the Diffusion of Knowledge, MERIT, Maastricht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Trade and Industry (1998), Our Competitive Future: Building the Knowledge-Driven Economy: Analytical Background, DTI, London. http://www.dti.gov.uk/comp/competitive/an_reprt.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H., L. Leydesdorff (1998), The endless transition: A “Triple Helix” of university-industry-government relations: Introduction to a theme issue, Minerva, 36: 203-208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H., L. Leydesdorff (2000), The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and “mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations, Research Policy, 29: 109-123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frenken, K., L. Leydesdorff (2000), Scaling trajectories in civil aircraft (1913-1997), Research Policy, 29: 331-348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foray, D. (1998), Errors and mistakes in technological systems: from potential regret to path dependent inefficiency, In: J. Lesourne, A. Orlean (Eds.) Advances in Self-Organisation and Evolutionary Economics, Economica, London, pp. 217-239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasoliba BÖhm, C. A. (1996), 10 anys d'integracio Europea, Vicens Vives, Barcelona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebhardt, C. (1997), Die Regionalisierung von Innovationsprozessen in der Informationstechnologie. Staatliche Forschungsfoerderung im Zeitalter der Globalisierung, Deutscher Universitaets Verlag, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godin, B., Y. Gingras (2000), The place of universities in the system of knowledge production, Research Policy, 29: 273-278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grupp, H. (1996), Spillover effects and the science base of innovations reconsidered: an empirical approach, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 6: 175-197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grupp, H., U. Schmoch (1999), Patent statistics in the age of globalisation: new legal procedures, new analytical methods, new economic interpretation, Research Policy, 28: 377-396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guibernau, M. (1999), Nations without States. Political Communities in a Global Age, Polity Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirasawa, R., T. Ijichi, H. Tomizawa, Y. Fujigaki (1998), A Comparative Survey on Science and Technology Policy System and on Policy Formulation Processes. Report for the STA: Special coordinating program 1998.

  • Institut d'Estudis Catalans (1997), Reports de la recerca a Catalunya. Tecnologies de la informacio i de les comunicacions, IEC, Barcelona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. S. (1999), The self-similar science system, Research Policy, 28: 501-517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lash, S., J. Urry (1994), Economies of Signs and Space, Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L. (1991), The static and dynamic analysis of network data using information theory, Social Networks, 13: 301-345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L. (1995), The Challenge of Scientometrics: The Development, Measurement, and Self-Organization of Scientific Communications, DSWO Press, Leiden University, Leiden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L. (2000), Is the EU becoming a single publication system? Scientometrics, 47: 265-280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L., H. Etzkowitz (1998), The Triple Helix as a model for innovation studies, Science and Public Policy, 25: 195-203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L., N. Oomes (1999), Is the European monetary system converging to integration? Social Science Information, 38: 57-86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1984), Soziale Systeme: Grundriss einer allgemeinen Theorie, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a. M., (1995, Social Systems (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1990), Die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a. M.

  • Lundvall, B.-Å. (1988), Innovation as an interactive process: from user-producer interaction to the national system of innovation, In: G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R.R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, L. Soete (Eds), Technical Change and Economic Theory, Pinter, London, pp. 349-369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, S. (1986), The distinctive research of the individual inventor, Research Policy, 15: 199-210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mothe, J. De la, G. Paquet (Eds) (1996), Evolutionary Economics and the New International Political Economy, Cassell Academic, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mothe, J. Dela, G. Paquet (1998), Local and Regional Systems of Innovation, Kluwer, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narin, F., D. Olivastro (1988), Technology Indicators Based on Patents and Patent Citations, In: A.F.J. Van raan (Ed.), Handbook of Quantitative Studies of Science and Technology, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 465-507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narin, F., D. Olivastro (1992), Status report: linkages between technology and science, Research Policy, 14: 237-249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narin, F., K. S. Hamilton, D. Olivastro (1997), The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science, Research Policy, 26: 317-320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nauwelaers C., A. Reid (1995), Methodologies for the evaluation of regional innovation potential, Scientometrics, 34: 497-511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. R. (Ed.) (1993) National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Study, Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. R. (1994), Economic growth via the coevolution of technology and institutions, In: L. Leydesdorff, P. Van DEN Besselaar (Eds), Evolutionary Economics and Chaos Theory: New Directions in Technology Studies, Pinter, London and New York, pp. 21-32.

  • Nelson, R. R., Winter, S. G. (1975), Growth theory from an evolutionary perspective: The differential productivity growth puzzle, American Economic Review, 65: 338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. R., Winter, S. G. (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT (1999), OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 1999. Benchmarking Knowledge-based Economies, OECD, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel, P., K. Pavitt (1994), The nature and economic importance of national innovation systems, STI Science Technology Industry Review, 14: 9-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavitt, K. (1984), Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a theory and a taxonomy, Research Policy, 13: 343-73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavitt, K. (1985), Patent statistics as indicators of innovative activities: Possibilities and problems, Scientometrics, 7: 77-99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petitbo, A., J. Bosch (1990), Estructura industrial, In: M. Parallada (Ed.), Estructura economica de Cataluna, Espasa-Calpe, Madrid, pp. 225-250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosa Pires, A. da, E. Anselmo de Castro (1997), Can a strategic project for a university be strategic to regional development? Science and Public Policy, 24: 15-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shinn, T. (1998), The impact of research and education on industry: A comparative analysis of the relationship of education and research systems to industrial progress in six countries, Industry & Higher Education, 12: 270-289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1934), Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. Eine Untersuchung über Unternehmergewinn, Kapital, Kredit, Zins und den Konjunkturzyklus, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theil, H. (1972), Statistical Decomposition Analysis, North-Holland, Amsterdam.

  • Vence, X. (1998), La politica tecnologica comunitaria y la cohesion regional. Los retos de los sistemas de innovacion perifericos, Civitas, Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, A., K. Packer (1996), Intellectual property and the wider innovation system, In: A. Webster, K. Packer (Eds), Innovation and the Intellectual Property System, Kluwer, London, pp. 1-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, R. R. (1984), The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zitt, M., R. Barre, A. Sigogneau, F. Laville (1999), Territorial concentration and evolution of science and technology activities in the European Union: A descriptive analysis, Research Policy, 28: 545-562.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. European Patent Office, Rijswijk, (The Netherlands)

    Marta Riba Vilanova

  2. Science and Technology Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, (The Netherlands)

    Loet Leydesdorff

Authors
  1. Marta Riba Vilanova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Loet Leydesdorff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Riba Vilanova, M., Leydesdorff, L. Why Catalonia cannot be considered as a regional innovation system. Scientometrics 50, 215–240 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010517505793

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010517505793

Keywords

Search

Navigation