Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Language biases in the coverage of the Science Citation Index and its consequencesfor international comparisons of national research performance

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Empirical evidence presented in this paper shows that the utmost care must be taken ininterpreting bibliometric data in a comparative evaluation of national research systems. From theresults of recent studies, the authors conclude that the value of impact indicators of researchactivities at the level of an institution or a country strongly depend upon whether one includes orexcludes research publications in SCI covered journals written in other languages than in English.Additional material was gathered to show the distribution of SCI papers among publicationlanguages. Finally, the authors make suggestions for further research on how to deal with this typeof problems in future national research performance studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. M. May, The scientific wealth of nations, Science, 275 (Feb 7) (1997) 793-796.

  2. E. Garfield, English–An international language for science, The Information Scientist, Dec 76, In: Essays of an Information Scientist, Vol. 1, pp. 19-20, ISI Press.

  3. T. N. van Leeuwen, H. F. Moed, R. J. W. Tijssen, M. S. Visser, A. F. J. van Raan, First Evidence of serious language-bias in the use of citation analysis for the evaluation of national science systems, Research Evaluation, Vol. 9, August 2000, 155-156.

  4. H. F. Moed, R. E. de Bruin, Th. N. Van Leeuwen, New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: database description, overview of indicators and first applications, Scientometrics, 33 (1995) 381-422.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. F. J. van Raan, Advanced bibliometric methods as quantitative core of peer review based evaluation and foresight exercises, Scientometrics, 36 (1996) 397-420.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Science & Technology Studies (CWTS), Leiden University, Leiden, (The Netherlands)

    Thed N. Van Leeuwen, Henk F. Moed, Robert J. W. Tijssen, Martijn S. Visser & Anthony F. J. Van Raan

Authors
  1. Thed N. Van Leeuwen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Henk F. Moed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Robert J. W. Tijssen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Martijn S. Visser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Anthony F. J. Van Raan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Leeuwen, T.N., Moed, H.F., Tijssen, R.J.W. et al. Language biases in the coverage of the Science Citation Index and its consequencesfor international comparisons of national research performance. Scientometrics 51, 335–346 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010549719484

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010549719484

Keywords

Search

Navigation