Abstract
We show that scientific production can be described by two variables: rate of production (rateof publications) and career duration. For 19th century physicists, we show that the time pattern ofproduction is random and Poisson distributed, contrary to the theory of cumulative advantage. Weshow that the exponential distribution provides excellent goodness-of-fit to rate of production andcareer duration. The good fits to these distributions can be explained naturally from the statisticsof exceedances. Thus, more powerful statistical tests and a better theoretical foundation isobtained for rate of production and career duration than has been the case for Lotka's Law.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Huber, J. C., Wagner-DÖbler, R., Scientific production: A statistical analysis of authors in mathematical logic, Scientometrics, 50 (2001) 323-337.
Huber, J. C., Inventive productivity and the statistics of exceedances, Scientometrics, 45 (1999) 33-53.
Huber, J. C., A statistical analysis of special cases of creativity, Journal of Creative Behavior, 34 (2000) 203-225.
Wagner-DÖbler, R., Berg, J., Physics 1800–1900: A quantitative outline, Scientometrics, 46 (1999) 213-285.
Allison, P. D., Long, J. S., Krauze, T. K., Cumulative advantage and inequality in science, American Sociological Review, 47 (1982) 615-625.
Price, D. J. D., A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 27 (1976) 292-306.
GlÄnzel, W., Schubert, A., The Cumulative Advantage Function. A mathematical formulation based on conditional expectations and its application to scientometric distribution, In: L. Egghe, R. Rousseau (Eds) Informetrics 89/90, New York, Elsevier, (1990), pp. 139-147.
Huber, J. C., Portmanteau test for randomness in Poisson data, Communications in Statistics: Simulation and Computation, 29 (2000) 1165-1182.
Price, D. J. D., Little Science, Big Science. Columbia University Press, New York, 1963.
Johnson, N. L., Kotz, S., Kemp, A. W., Univariate Discrete Distributions, John Wiley Sons, New York, 2nd ed., 1993, p. 153.
Engelhardt, M., Reliability Estimation and Applications, In: N. BALAKRISHNAN, Asit B. Basu (Eds), The Exponential Distribution, New York, Gordon and Breach, (1995) pp. 73-91.
Johnson, N. L., Kotz, S., Balakrishnan, N., Continuous Univariate Distributions, John Wiley Sons, New York, 2nd ed. Vol 1, 1994, p. 508, eq. 19.31e.
Hewett, J. E., Two-stage and multi-stage tests of hypotheses, In: N. Balakrishnan, Asit B. Basu (Eds), The Exponential Distribution, New York, Gordon and Breach, (1995), pp. 453-459.
Pickands, J., Statistical inference using extreme order statistics, The Annals of Statistics, 3 (1975) 119-131.
Johnson, N. L., Kotz, S., Balakrishnan, N., Continuous Univariate Distributions, John Wiley Sons, New York, 2nd ed, Vol 1, 1994, pp. 614-620.
Embrechts, P., Kluppelberg, C., Mikosch, T., Modelling Extremal Events for Insurance and Finance, Springer, Berlin, 1997, pp. 294-352.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Huber, J.C., Wagner-Döbler, R. Scientific production: A statistical analysis of authors in physics, 1800-1900. Scientometrics 50, 437–453 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010558714879
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010558714879