Skip to main content
Log in

Modelling the Growth of Literature in the Area of Theoretical Population Genetics

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Different approaches are introduced for studying the growth of scientific knowledge, as reflected through publications and authors. Selected growth models are applied to the cumulated growth of publications and authors in theoretical population genetics from 1907 to 1980. The criteria are studied on which growth models are to be selected for their possible application in the growth of literature. It is concluded that the power model is observed to be the only model among the models studied which best explains the cumulative growth of publication and author counts in the theoretical population genetics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. PRICE, D. J. DE S., Science since Babylon. New Haven, Conn., Yale University Press. 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  2. PRICE, D. J. DE S., Little Science, Big Science. New York, Columbia University Press, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  3. CRANE, D., Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  4. KUHN, T., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  5. STERMAN, J. D. The growth of knowledge: Testing a theory of scientific revolutions with a formal model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 28 (1985) 93.

    Google Scholar 

  6. MULKAY, M. J., Problem areas and research networks in science. Sociology, 9 (1975) 187–203.

    Google Scholar 

  7. TOULMIN, S., Foresight and Understanding. New York, Harper and Row, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  8. TOULMIN, S., Conceptual revolutions in science. In: R. S. COHEN, M. W. WARTOFSKY (Eds), Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Volume 3. Dordrecht, Holland, D. Reidel Publishing Company, (1967) 331–347.

    Google Scholar 

  9. HOLTON, G., Scientific research and scholarship: Notes towards the design of proper scales. Daedalus, 91 (1962) 362–399.

    Google Scholar 

  10. GOFFMAN, W., A. mathematical model for the growth of a scientific discipline. Journal of Association for Computing Machinery, 78 (1971) 173–185.

    Google Scholar 

  11. MULLINS, N.C., Theories and Theory Groups in Contemporary American Sociology. New York, Harper and Row, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  12. COLE, F. J., EALES, N. B., The history of comparative anatomy. Part 1. A statistical analysis of the literature. Science Progress, 11 (1917) 578–596.

    Google Scholar 

  13. WILSON, P. W., FRED, E. B., The growth curve of a scientific literature: Nitrogen fixation by plants. Scientific Monthly, 41 (1935) 240–250.

    Google Scholar 

  14. GRANBERG, A., A Bibliometric Survey of Fibre-Optics Research in Sweden, West Germany, and Japan. Lund, Sweden, Research Policy Institute.

  15. SULLIVAN, D. et al., The state of science indicators in the specialty of week interactions. Social Studies of Science, 7 (1977) 167–203.

    Google Scholar 

  16. TAGUE, J., BEHESHTI, J., REES-POTTER, L., The laws of exponential growth: Evidence, implications and forecasts. Library Trends Summer, (1981) 125–149.

  17. BRAUN, T., LYON, W. S., BUJDOSÓ, E., Literature growth and decay: An activation analysis resume. Analytical Chemistry, 49 (1977) 682A-688A.

    Google Scholar 

  18. MAY, K. O., Quantitative growth of the mathematical literature. Science, 154 (1966) 1672–1673.

    Google Scholar 

  19. MENARD, H. W., Science: Growth and Change. Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  20. DAMASK, A. C., Mathematical models of scientific productivity. In: H. I. FUSFELD, R. N. LANGLOISES (Eds), Understanding R&D Productivity. New York, Pergamon Press, 1982, p. 97.

    Google Scholar 

  21. ANDERLA, G., Information in 1985: A Forecasting Study of Information Needs and Resources. Paris, OECD, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  22. EFTHOMIADIS, E. N., The growth of the OPAC literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41 (1990) 342–347.

    Google Scholar 

  23. GUPTA, B. M., SHARMA, P., KUMAR, S., Growth of World and Indian literature. Scientometrics, 44 (1999) 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  24. WOLFRAM, D., CHU, C. M., LIU, X., Growth of knowledge: Bibliometric analysis using online database data. In: L. EGGHE, R. ROUSSEAU (Eds), Informetrics, 89/90. Amsterdam, Elsevier, 1990, 355–372.

    Google Scholar 

  25. EGGHE, L., RAO, I. K. R., Classification of growth models based on growth rates and its applications. Scientometrics, 25 (1992) 5–46.

    Google Scholar 

  26. EGGHE, L., ROUSSEAU, R., Introduction to Informetrics. Amsterdam, Elsevier, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  27. RAO, I. K. R., Growth, obsolescence, collaboration, and circulation statistics. In: I. K. R. RAO (Ed.), Workshop on Informetrics and Scientometrics, l6–l9 March 1998: Workshop Papers. Bangalore, Documentation Research and Training Center, Indian Statistical Institute, 1998, 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  28. CROXTON, F. E., COWDEN, D. J., Applied General Statistics. London, Pitman & Sons, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  29. FELSENSTEIN, J., Bibliography of Theoretical Population Genetics. Pennsylvania, Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, Inc., 1981.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gupta, B.M., Karisiddappa, C.R. Modelling the Growth of Literature in the Area of Theoretical Population Genetics. Scientometrics 49, 321–355 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010577321082

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010577321082

Keywords

Navigation